Detecting shape deformation of moving patterns

This study measured thresholds for the discrimination of rigidly and nonridgidly rotating patterns in two dimensions. The stimuli employed were closed contours created by the sum of two 'radial frequency' components and sensitivity to their deformation was measured as a function of the difference in the angular velocities of the components. Results show that thresholds do not depend on the specific shape of the pattern. To quantify the influence of local computations versus global pooling, thresholds were measured with parts of the pattern covered by (invisible) pie-shaped apertures. One finds thresholds are not simply a function of the total amount of pattern visible but exhibit a dependence on the number of apertures. Moreover, sensitivity to deformation could neither be fully explained on the basis of local computations nor by linear global summation. A simultaneous masking paradigm was employed to elucidate potential mechanisms involved in the computation of deformation. While 1D masks (horizontal gratings and translating random dots) only marginally elevate thresholds, rotating and expanding motion significantly impairs sensitivity. This indicates that detectors tuned to radial and circular motion are involved in the computation of shape deformation.

[1]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[2]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[3]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of Biological Motion , 1997, Perception.

[4]  Pete E. Lestrel,et al.  Fourier Descriptors and their Applications in Biology , 2008 .

[5]  Quick Rf.  A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[6]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Monocular discrimination of rigidly and nonrigidly moving objects , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—II. Spatial integration of velocity information along contours , 1988, Vision Research.

[8]  H. Wallach,et al.  Circles and derived figures in rotation. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  J F Norman,et al.  The Detectability of Geometric Structure in Rapidly Changing Optical Patterns , 1991, Perception.

[10]  Karen Lu.  HARMONIC ANALYSIS OF THE HUMAN FACE. , 1965, Biometrics.

[11]  J R Pomerantz,et al.  The rubber pencil illusion , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[13]  H. Wilson,et al.  Perception of head orientation , 2000, Vision Research.

[14]  R. Weale.  Analysis of Visual Behaviour , 1983 .

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—I. Perception of nonrigidity and motion direction in translating sinusoidal lines , 1988, Vision Research.

[16]  H. Wilson,et al.  Concentric orientation summation in human form vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[17]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[18]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns depends on duration, contrast and eccentricity , 1992, Vision Research.

[19]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Human Cortical Regions Involved in Extracting Depth from Motion , 1999, Neuron.

[20]  J T Todd,et al.  The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  D. Burr,et al.  Large receptive fields for optic flow detection in humans , 1998, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Perrett,et al.  Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (STPa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  G. Johansson,et al.  Visual Perception of Bending Motion , 1973, Perception.

[24]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[25]  D. C. Essen,et al.  Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[27]  J. N. Bassili.  Emotion recognition: the role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of three-dimensional structure from rigid and nonrigid motion , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  P. Ekman.  Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[30]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[31]  D. C. Van Essen,et al.  Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  A. Verri,et al.  First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Jake K. Aggarwal,et al.  Nonrigid Motion Analysis: Articulated and Elastic Motion , 1998, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[36]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual perception of changing size: The effect of object size , 1979, Vision Research.

[37]  A. Ames.  Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window , 1951 .

[38]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[40]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[41]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  M. Graziano,et al.  Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  D. Burr,et al.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion , 1995, Nature.

[45]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[46]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.