A procedure for studying online conversational processing using a chat bot

This article reports the development of a tool for examining the social and cognitive processes of people involved in a conversational interaction. Research on how people process utterances while they are actually engaged in an interaction has been extremely rare. To that end, we have developed a conversational bot (computer program designed to mimic human communication) with which participants can chat in a format similar to instant messaging. This program allows for the recording of comprehension speed, and it can be interfaced with secondary tasks (e.g., lexical decisions) in order to examine online conversational processing. Additional research possibilities with this program are discussed.

[1]  T. M. Holtgraves,et al.  Perceiving artificial social agents , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Thomas Holtgraves,et al.  Comprehending indirect replies : When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? , 1999 .

[3]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation , 2003 .

[4]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[5]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Perspective-Taking in Communication: Representations of Others' Knowledge in Reference , 1991 .

[6]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[7]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[8]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Comprehending illocutionary force , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[9]  William B. Stiles,et al.  Verbal Response Modes and Dimensions of Interpersonal Roles: A Method of Discourse Analysis. , 1978 .

[10]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[11]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[12]  B. Keysar,et al.  The Illusory Transparency of Intention: Linguistic Perspective Taking in Text , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  T. Holtgraves.  Communication in context: effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  H. H. Clark.  Arenas of language use , 1993 .

[15]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Conversational sequences and preference for indirect speech acts , 1988 .

[16]  T. Holtgraves.  Preference Organization and Reply Comprehension , 2000 .

[17]  Thomas Holtgraves,et al.  Interpreting Indirect Replies , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  D. Barr,et al.  Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[19]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .