Is There a Standard Trochanteric Entry Site for Nailing of Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?

Objectives: To evaluate the variability of the ideal trochanteric starting point as a possible cause for malreduction of subtrochanteric fractures and to analyze the accuracy of contralateral templating to predict correct entry site. Methods: Standardized anteroposterior pelvis radiographs of 50 patients were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Patients with advanced osteoarthritis, severe hip deformity, and radiographs with asymmetric hip rotation were excluded. Ideal nail entry site was established using a template for a trochanteric nail with a 6° proximal bend. The distance from the greater trochanteric tip to the ideal nail entry site was measured. Additionally, offset of the greater trochanter tip from the femoral longitudinal axis was measured. Interobserver reliability and accuracy of contralateral templating were evaluated. Results: The ideal entry point ranged from 16 mm medial to 8 mm lateral to the trochanteric tip (mean, 3 mm medial; standard deviation, 5 mm). In 70% of patients, the ideal entry point was medial to and in 23% lateral to the tip of the greater trochanter. Ideal entry points were located within 2 mm of the trochanteric tip in 29% and within 4 mm in 44% of patients. The location of the ideal entry point relative to the trochanteric tip had a weak correlation with patient height and neck shaft angle (r: −0.23 and r: −0.35, respectively). Interobserver reliability and agreement between left and right side measurements were strong (intraclass correlation coefficient: >0.94 and >0.88, P < 0.001, respectively). The mean measurement differences between sides was 0 mm (95% confidence interval: −1 to 1). Greater trochanter offset averaged 15 mm (range, 5-26 mm; standard deviation: 5) on the right and 15 mm (range, 5-25 mm; standard deviation: 5.1) on the left (P = 0.95). Conclusion: A high degree of variability exists for the ideal trochanteric entry site. The trochanteric tip represents the ideal starting point in only the minority of cases. Preoperative contralateral templating provides an accurate means for establishing a patient-specific entry point to minimize fracture malreduction.

[1]  P. Hoffmeyer,et al.  Treatment of Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Fractures with Use of an Intramedullary Nail or a 95° Screw-Plate: A Prospective, Randomized Study , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  C. Roberts,et al.  Second Generation Intramedullary Nailing of Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study of Fracture Site Motion , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[3]  R. Siegel The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  S. Pelet,et al.  [Osteosynthesis of per- and subtrochanteric fractures by blade plate versus gamma nail. A randomized prospective study]. , 2001, Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera.

[5]  L. Antonelli Closed intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the femur. Problems related to anatomical variations of the greater trochanter. , 1989, Italian journal of orthopaedics and traumatology.

[6]  T. Russell,et al.  Is There a Gluteus Medius Tendon Injury During Reaming Through a Modified Medial Trochanteric Portal? A Cadaver Study , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[7]  W. Ricci,et al.  Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures: Current Concepts , 2009, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[8]  J. Vroemen,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the Gamma nail and sliding hip screw. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  J. Koebke,et al.  Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point. , 2002, Injury.

[10]  R. Ostrum,et al.  A Critical Analysis of the Eccentric Starting Point for Trochanteric Intramedullary Femoral Nailing , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[11]  Thomas A. Russell,et al.  Avoidance of Malreduction of Proximal Femoral Shaft Fractures With the Use of a Minimally Invasive Nail Insertion Technique (MINIT) , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[13]  Roy Sanders,et al.  Trochanteric versus Piriformis Entry Portal for the Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fractures , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[14]  K. Christensen,et al.  Cephalomedullary Nails in the Treatment of High-energy Proximal Femur Fractures in Young Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Trochanteric Versus Piriformis Fossa Entry Portal , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  Wolfgang Pichler,et al.  Anatomy of the greater femoral trochanter: clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing: Anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[16]  R. Zickel Subtrochanteric femoral fractures. , 1980, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[17]  R. Ganz,et al.  Entry Point Soft Tissue Damage in Antegrade Femoral Nailing: A Cadaver Study , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[18]  S. Ponzer,et al.  The standard Gamma nail or the Medoff sliding plate for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A randomised, controlled trial. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  P. Hsieh,et al.  Biologic plating versus intramedullary nailing for comminuted subtrochanteric fractures in young adults: a prospective, randomized study of 66 cases. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  R. Bleys,et al.  Soft tissue anatomy around the hip and its implications for choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing , 2008, Clinical anatomy.

[21]  H. Sagi,et al.  Clamp-assisted reduction of high subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  R. Bleys,et al.  Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip. , 2005, Injury.

[23]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[24]  A. Tencer,et al.  A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  M. Baumgaertner,et al.  The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.