Magnetic Diffusivity Tensor and Dynamo Effects in Rotating and Shearing Turbulence

The turbulent magnetic diffusivity tensor is determined in the presence of rotation or shear. The question is addressed whether dynamo action from the shear-current effect can explain large-scale magnetic field generation found in simulations with shear. For this purpose a set of evolution equations for the response to imposed test fields is solved with turbulent and mean motions calculated from the momentum and continuity equations. The corresponding results for the electromotive force are used to calculate turbulent transport coefficients. The diagonal components of the turbulent magnetic diffusivity tensor are found to be very close together, but their values increase slightly with increasing shear and decrease with increasing rotation rate. In the presence of shear, the sign of the two off-diagonal components of the turbulent magnetic diffusion tensor is the same and opposite to the sign of the shear. This implies that dynamo action from the shear-current effect is impossible, except perhaps for high magnetic Reynolds numbers. However, even though there is no alpha effect on the average, the components of the α tensor display Gaussian fluctuations around zero. These fluctuations are strong enough to drive an incoherent alpha-shear dynamo. The incoherent shear-current effect, on the other hand, is found to be subdominant.

[1]  M. Proctor.  Effects of fluctuation on αΩ dynamo models , 2007, 0708.3210.

[2]  Axel Brandenburg.  The case for a distributed solar dynamo shaped by near-surface shear , 2005 .

[3]  A. Brandenburg,et al.  Scale dependence of alpha effect and turbulent diffusivity , 2008, 0801.1320.

[4]  F. Cattaneo,et al.  Nonlinear restrictions on dynamo action. [in magnetic fields of astrophysical objects , 1992 .

[5]  M. Rieutord,et al.  Dynamo action in stratified convection with overshoot , 1992 .

[6]  A. Pouquet,et al.  Turbulent dynamos driven by convection , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  K. Rädler.  Mean‐field approach to spherical dynamo models , 1980 .

[8]  Strong mean field dynamos require supercritical helicity fluxes , 2005, astro-ph/0505457.

[9]  H. K. Mo Att,et al.  Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids , 1978 .

[10]  Electromotive force and large-scale magnetic dynamo in a turbulent flow with a mean shear. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  R. Kraichnan.  Diffusion of weak magnetic fields by isotropic turbulence , 1976, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  本蔵 義守,et al.  F. Krause and K. -H. Radler: Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York, 271ページ, 21.5×15.5cm, 10,800円. , 1982 .

[13]  An Incoherent α-Ω Dynamo in Accretion Disks , 1995, astro-ph/9510038.

[14]  E. Vishniac,et al.  Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Astrophysical Dynamos , 2000, astro-ph/0010373.

[15]  Nonlinear theory of a "shear-current" effect and mean-field magnetic dynamos. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  N. Kleeorin,et al.  Generation of magnetic field by combined action of turbulence and shear. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[17]  L. Kitchatinov,et al.  Do mean-field dynamos in nonrotating turbulent shear-flows exist? , 2006, astro-ph/0604375.

[18]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal , 1995, Nature.

[19]  Charles F. Gammie,et al.  Local Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Accretion Disks , 1995 .

[20]  E. Blackman,et al.  Dynamic Nonlinearity in Large-Scale Dynamos with Shear , 2002, astro-ph/0204497.

[21]  Generation of large-scale vorticity in a homogeneous turbulence with a mean velocity shear. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  U. Christensen,et al.  Mean-field concept and direct numerical simulations of rotating magnetoconvection and the geodynamo , 2006, astro-ph/0609752.

[23]  Fausto Cattaneo,et al.  On the Origin of Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Photosphere , 1999 .

[24]  M. Rieutord,et al.  Magnetic structures in a dynamo simulation , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  R. Stepanov,et al.  Mean electromotive force due to turbulence of a conducting fluid in the presence of mean flow. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Jack Wisdom,et al.  Local simulations of planetary rings , 1986 .

[27]  U. Christensen,et al.  Mean-field view on rotating magnetoconvection and a geodynamo model , 2005 .

[28]  J. H. Piddington.  Turbulent diffusion of magnetic fields in astrophysical plasmas , 1981 .

[29]  L. Ryashko,et al.  Stochastic dynamo model for subcritical transition. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Robert F. Stein,et al.  Dynamo-generated Turbulence and Large-Scale Magnetic Fields in a Keplerian Shear Flow , 1995 .

[31]  K. Subramanian,et al.  Astrophysical magnetic field and nonlinear dynamo theory , 2004, astro-ph/0405052.

[32]  H. K. Moffatt.  Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids , 1978 .

[33]  The inverse cascade and nonlinear alpha-effect in simulations of isotropic helical hydromagnetic turbulence , 2000, astro-ph/0006186.

[34]  U. Frisch,et al.  Helical and Nonhelical Turbulent Dynamos , 1981 .

[35]  E. Blackman,et al.  Dynamical Quenching of the α2 Dynamo , 2001, astro-ph/0111470.