Background The explosion of mobile phones with app capabilities coupled with increased expectations of the patient-consumers’ role in managing their care presents a unique opportunity to use mobile health (mHealth) apps. Objectives The aim of this paper is to identify the features and characteristics most-valued by patient-consumers (“users”) that contribute positively to the rating of an app. Methods A collection of 234 apps associated with reputable health organizations found in the medical, health, and fitness categories of the Apple iTunes store and Google Play marketplace was assessed manually for the presence of 12 app features and characteristics. Regression analysis was used to determine which, if any, contributed positively to a user’s rating of the app. Results Analysis of these 12 features explained 9.3% (R 2=.093 n=234, P<.001) of the variation in an app’s rating, with only 5 reaching statistical significance. Of the 5 reaching statistical significance, plan or orders, export of data, usability, and cost contributed positively to a user’s rating, while the tracker feature detracted from it. Conclusions These findings suggest that users appreciate features that save time over current methods and identify an app as valuable when it is simple and intuitive to use, provides specific instructions to better manage a condition, and shares data with designated individuals. Although tracking is a core function of most health apps, this feature may detract from a user’s experience when not executed properly. Further investigation into mHealth app features is worthwhile given the inability of the most common features to explain a large portion of an app’s rating. In the future, studies should focus on one category in the app store, specific diseases, or desired behavior change, and methods should include measuring the quality of each feature, both through manual assessment and evaluation of user reviews. Additional investigations into understanding the impact of synergistic features, incentives, social media, and gamification are also warranted to identify possible future trends.
[1]
Christopher E. Beaudoin,et al.
Apps Seeking Theories: Results of a Study on the Use of Health Behavior Change Theories in Cancer Survivorship Mobile Apps
,
2015,
JMIR mHealth and uHealth.
[2]
Wilhelm Kirch,et al.
Mobile Applications for Diabetics: A Systematic Review and Expert-Based Usability Evaluation Considering the Special Requirements of Diabetes Patients Age 50 Years or Older
,
2014,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[3]
Yin Liu,et al.
mHealthApps: A Repository and Database of Mobile Health Apps
,
2015,
JMIR mHealth and uHealth.
[4]
Sudipto Banerjee,et al.
Rating Exposure Control Using Bayesian Decision Analysis
,
2006,
Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.
[5]
Amos S Hundert,et al.
Commercially Available Mobile Phone Headache Diary Apps: A Systematic Review
,
2014,
JMIR mHealth and uHealth.
[6]
E. Deci,et al.
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.
,
2000,
The American psychologist.
[7]
Devin M Mann,et al.
Weight loss using evidence-based strategies in mobile apps. Authors' response.
,
2014,
American journal of preventive medicine.
[8]
Robert B. Wallace,et al.
The Institute of Medicine’s New Report on Living Well With Chronic Illness
,
2012,
Preventing chronic disease.
[9]
R. Dellavalle,et al.
Mobile applications in dermatology.
,
2013,
JAMA dermatology.
[10]
Jounghwa Choi,et al.
Smoking Cessation Apps for Smartphones: Content Analysis With the Self-Determination Theory
,
2014,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[11]
J. Bernhardt,et al.
Behavioral Functionality of Mobile Apps in Health Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature
,
2015,
JMIR mHealth and uHealth.
[12]
N. Howes,et al.
Obesity Surgery Smartphone Apps: a Review
,
2013,
Obesity Surgery.