Nano-Evaluris: an inhalation and explosion risk evaluation method for nanoparticle use. Part I: description of the methodology

In this paper, an inhalation health and explosion safety risk assessment methodology for nanopowders is described. Since toxicological threshold limit values are still unknown for nanosized substances, detailed risk assessment on specific plants may not be carried out. A simple approach based on occupational hazard/exposure band expressed in mass concentrations is proposed for nanopowders. This approach is consolidated with an iso surface toxicological scaling method, which has the merit, although incomplete, to provide concentration threshold levels for which new metrological instruments should be developed for proper air monitoring in order to ensure safety. Whenever the processing or use of nanomaterials is introducing a risk to the worker, a specific nano pictogram is proposed to inform the worker. Examples of risk assessment of process equipment (i.e., containment valves) processing various nanomaterials are provided. Explosion risks related to very reactive nanomaterials such as aluminum nanopowders can be assessed using this new analysis methodology adapted to nanopowders. It is nevertheless found that to formalize and extend this approach, it is absolutely necessary to develop new relevant standard apparatuses and to qualify individual and collective safety barriers with respect to health and explosion risks. In spite of these uncertainties, it appears, as shown in the second paper (Part II) that health and explosion risks, evaluated for given MWCNTs and aluminum nanoparticles, remain manageable in their continuous fabrication mode, considering current individual and collective safety barriers that can be put in place. The authors would, however, underline that peculiar attention must be paid to non-continuous modes of operations, such as process equipment cleaning steps, that are often under-analyzed and are too often forgotten critical steps needing vigilance in order to minimize potential toxic and explosion risks.

[1]  Jean-Marc Brignon,et al.  Nanoparticle risk management and cost evaluation: a general framework , 2011 .

[2]  Richard Gowland,et al.  The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: a step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment? , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  K. Leong,et al.  Multifunctional nanorods for gene delivery , 2003, Nature materials.

[4]  A. Brash,et al.  The structure of coral allene oxide synthase reveals a catalase adapted for metabolism of a fatty acid hydroperoxide. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Tymish Y. Ohulchanskyy,et al.  Optical tracking of organically modified silica nanoparticles as DNA carriers: a nonviral, nanomedicine approach for gene delivery. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Pieter van Broekhuizen,et al.  Exposure limits for nanoparticles: report of an international workshop on nano reference values. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  Cécile Fiévez,et al.  ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  N. Bunce,et al.  Haber's Rule: The Search for Quantitative Relationships in Toxicology , 2003 .

[9]  Dan Luo,et al.  Cellular Fate of a Modular DNA Delivery System Mediated by Silica Nanoparticles , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[10]  J. Carter,et al.  Particulate matter initiates inflammatory cytokine release by activation of capsaicin and acid receptors in a human bronchial epithelial cell line. , 1999, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[11]  Arthur E. Cote,et al.  Fire Protection Handbook , 1991 .

[12]  H. Yoo,et al.  Self-assembled nanoparticles containing hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan for gene delivery. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[13]  Laura Hodson,et al.  Harmonization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nano-objects; report of a workshop. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  P. Swuste,et al.  Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  Olivier Salvi,et al.  A global view on ARAMIS, a risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of the SEVESO II directive. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  B. Veronesi,et al.  The surface charge of visible particulate matter predicts biological activation in human bronchial epithelial cells. , 2002, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[17]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  RS Cant,et al.  On the transient flow in the 20-liter explosion sphere , 2001 .

[19]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Stoffenmanager Nano version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[20]  David M Zalk,et al.  History and Evolution of Control Banding: A Review , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[21]  M. Ferrari Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  Rolf K. Eckhoff,et al.  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries , 1991 .

[23]  Kikuo Okuyama,et al.  Progress in developing spray-drying methods for the production of controlled morphology particles: From the nanometer to submicrometer size ranges , 2011 .

[24]  A. Zwart,et al.  Concentration—time mortality response relationship of irritant and systemically acting vapours and gases , 1986 .

[25]  Ghislaine Lacroix,et al.  Biodistribution and clearance of instilled carbon nanotubes in rat lung , 2008, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[26]  Christian Delvosalle,et al.  ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[27]  Martin Glor,et al.  ELECTROSTATIC HAZARDS IN POWDER HANDLING , 1988 .

[28]  T. Schiestel,et al.  A nonviral DNA delivery system based on surface modified silica-nanoparticles can efficiently transfect cells in vitro. , 2000, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[29]  L. Lazzeri,et al.  Gelatin nanoparticles produced by a simple W/O emulsion as delivery system for methotrexate , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[30]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[31]  Wei Li,et al.  Potential neurological lesion after nasal instillation of TiO(2) nanoparticles in the anatase and rutile crystal phases. , 2008, Toxicology letters.

[32]  Laurent Perrin,et al.  Dust explosions: How should the influence of humidity be taken into account? , 2009 .

[33]  R. C. Pluss,et al.  158. Entwicklung einer neuen Stoffaustausch‐Struktur für Rektifizier‐ und Absorptionskolonnen , 1994 .

[34]  O. Dufaud,et al.  Ignition and explosion risks of nanopowders. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[35]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[36]  A. Vignes,et al.  Risk assessment of the ignitability and explosivity of aluminum nanopowders , 2010 .

[37]  Wei Li,et al.  Time-dependent translocation and potential impairment on central nervous system by intranasally instilled TiO(2) nanoparticles. , 2008, Toxicology.

[38]  J E Kipp,et al.  The role of solid nanoparticle technology in the parenteral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. , 2004, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[39]  N. Özer,et al.  In vivo half life of nanoencapsulated L-asparaginase , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[40]  R. Lockey,et al.  Cationic silica nanoparticles as gene carriers: synthesis, characterization and transfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo. , 2004, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[41]  M. Pegg,et al.  Effects of turbulence on dust explosions , 1988 .

[42]  Thierry Meyer,et al.  Management of nanomaterials safety in research environment , 2010, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[43]  Wolfgang Peukert,et al.  Entwicklungstendenzen in der Feststoff‐verfahrenstechnik , 1996 .

[44]  Hans‐Georg Schecker,et al.  Theoretische Überlegungen zum Einfluß der Teilchengröße auf die Mindestzündenergie von Stäuben , 1979 .