Emulsification in turbulent flow: 3. Daughter drop-size distribution.

Systematic set of experiments is performed to clarify the effects of several factors on the size distribution of the daughter drops, which are formed as a result of drop breakage during emulsification in turbulent flow. The effects of oil viscosity, etaD, interfacial tension, sigma, and rate of energy dissipation in the turbulent flow, epsilon, are studied. As starting oil-water premixes we use emulsions containing monodisperse oil drops, which have been generated by membrane emulsification. By passing these premixes through a narrow-gap homogenizer, working in turbulent regime of emulsification, we monitor the changes in the drop-size distribution with the emulsification time. The experimental data are analyzed by using a new numerical procedure, which is based on the assumption (supported by the experimental data) that the probability for formation of daughter drops with diameter smaller than the maximum diameter of the stable drops, d<d(MAX), is proportional to the drop number concentrations in the final emulsions, which are obtained after a long emulsification time. We found that the breakage of a single "mother" drop leads to the formation of multiple daughter drops, and that the number and size distribution of these daughter drops depend strongly on the viscosity of the dispersed phase. Different scaling laws are found to describe the experimental results for the oils of low and high viscosity. The obtained results for the daughter drop-size distribution are in a reasonably good agreement with the experimental results reported by other authors. In contrast, the comparison with several basic model functions, proposed in the literature, does not show good agreement and the possible reasons are discussed. The proposed numerical procedure allows us to describe accurately the evolution of all main characteristics of the drop-size distribution during emulsification, such as the number and volume averaged diameters, and the distributive and cumulative functions by number and by volume. The procedure allowed us to clarify the relative importance of the drop breakage rate constant and of the daughter drop-size distribution for the evolution of the various mean diameters.

[1]  J. Lasheras,et al.  A review of statistical models for the break-up of an immiscible fluid immersed into a fully developed turbulent flow , 2002 .

[2]  Harvey W. Blanch,et al.  Bubble break-up in gas—liquid bioreactors: Break-up in turbulent flows , 1986 .

[3]  G. D. Rose,et al.  Rheology of high internal phase emulsions. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Neal R. Amundson,et al.  Analysis of Breakage in Dispersed Phase Systems , 1966 .

[5]  N. Denkov,et al.  Interrelation between Drop Size and Protein Adsorption at Various Emulsification Conditions , 2003 .

[6]  Hercilio Rivas,et al.  Bitumen-in-Water Emulsions: An Overview on Formation, Stability, and Rheological Properties , 2002 .

[7]  Theoretical analysis of the steady state particle size distribution in limited breakage processes , 1998 .

[8]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  H. Blanch,et al.  Bubble coalescence and break‐up in air‐sparged bubble columns , 1990 .

[10]  F. B. Sprow Distribution of drop sizes produced in turbulent liquid—liquid dispersion , 1967 .

[11]  P. Becher,et al.  Encyclopedia of emulsion technology , 1983 .

[12]  Costas Tsouris,et al.  Breakage and coalescence models for drops in turbulent dispersions , 1994 .

[13]  Margaritis Kostoglou,et al.  On the steady-state size distribution of dispersions in breakage processes , 1997 .

[14]  Heh Han Meijer,et al.  Droplet breakup mechanisms : stepwise equilibrium versus transient dispersion , 1993 .

[15]  K. S. Gandhi,et al.  Breakage of viscous and non-Newtonian drops in stirred dispersions , 1986 .

[16]  J. Hinze Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes , 1955 .

[17]  S. Chander,et al.  Kinetics of Drop Breakage in Stirred Vessels under Turbulent Conditions , 2005 .

[18]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Solution of inverse problems in population balances. II: Particle break-up , 1995 .

[19]  Nicholas P. Cheremisinoff,et al.  Handbook of fluids in motion , 1983 .

[20]  K. Kandori,et al.  Formation mechanisms of monodispersed W/O emulsions by SPG filter emulsification method , 1991 .

[21]  H. Meijer,et al.  Dynamics of liquid-liquid mixing : a 2-zone model , 1995 .

[22]  R. Calabrese,et al.  Drop breakup in turbulent stirred‐tank contactors. Part II: Relative influence of viscosity and interfacial tension , 1986 .

[23]  R. S. Sanders,et al.  Bubble size in coalescence dominant regime of turbulent air–water flow through horizontal pipes , 2003 .

[24]  Margaritis Kostoglou,et al.  Toward a unified framework for the derivation of breakage functions based on the statistical theory of turbulence , 2005 .

[25]  Arnaudov,et al.  Adsorption Kinetics of Some Polyethylene Glycol Octylphenyl Ethers Studied by the Fast Formed Drop Technique. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[26]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Drop size distribution and holdup profiles in a multistage extraction column , 1994 .

[27]  Breakup in stochastic Stokes flows: sub-Kolmogorov drops in isotropic turbulence , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  C. Sleicher Maximum stable drop size in turbulent flow , 1962 .

[29]  K. S. Gandhi,et al.  A two-zone model of breakage frequency of drops in stirred dispersions , 1994 .

[30]  R. Borwankar,et al.  Competitive adsorption of monoglycerides and lecithin at the vegetable oil—water interface , 1991 .

[31]  Rainer Bleck,et al.  A fast, approximative method for integrating the stochastic coalescence equation , 1970 .

[32]  T. Danner,et al.  Emulsification in turbulent flow 2. Breakage rate constants. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[33]  S. Saito,et al.  Scale effect on breakup process in liquid-liquid agitated tanks. , 1983 .

[34]  Juan C. Lasheras,et al.  On the breakup of an air bubble injected into a fully developed turbulent flow. Part 1. Breakup frequency , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[35]  S. Saito,et al.  SIMULATION MODEL FOR BREAKUP PROCESS IN AN AGITATED TANK , 1980 .

[36]  A J Karabelas,et al.  On the self-similar solution of fragmentation equation: Numerical evaluation with implications for the inverse problem. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[37]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[38]  W. Agterof,et al.  Droplet breakup in concentrated emulsions , 2001 .

[39]  Bruce Campbell,et al.  Evaluation of the precision of drop-size determination in oil/water emulsions by low-resolution NMR spectroscopy. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[40]  T. Danner,et al.  Role of surfactant type and concentration for the mean drop size during emulsification in turbulent flow. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[41]  A. Karabelas,et al.  On the attainment of steady state in turbulent pipe flow of dilute dispersions , 1998 .

[42]  J. P. Gupta,et al.  A model for transitional breakage probability of droplets in agitated lean liquid-liquid dispersions , 1979 .

[43]  A. Karabelas,et al.  A contribution towards predicting the evolution of droplet size distribution in flowing dilute liquid/liquid dispersions , 2001 .

[44]  Krassimir D. Danov,et al.  Capillary mechanisms in membrane emulsification: oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by Tween 20 and milk proteins , 2002 .

[45]  K. S. Gandhi,et al.  A new model for the breakage frequency of drops in turbulent stirred dispersions , 1992 .

[46]  C. Dalmazzone,et al.  Drop break-up in turbulent pipe flow downstream of a restriction , 2005 .

[47]  H. P. Grace DISPERSION PHENOMENA IN HIGH VISCOSITY IMMISCIBLE FLUID SYSTEMS AND APPLICATION OF STATIC MIXERS AS DISPERSION DEVICES IN SUCH SYSTEMS , 1982 .

[48]  Y. Uemura,et al.  NOVEL PROCEDURE FOR MONODISPERSED POLYMERIC MICROSPHERES WITH HIGH ELECTRIFYING ADDITIVE CONTENT BY PARTICLE-SHRINKING METHOD VIA SPG MEMBRANE EMULSIFICATION , 1996 .

[49]  Jerzy Bałdyga,et al.  Drop break‐up in intermittent turbulence: Maximum stable and transient sizes of drops , 1998 .

[50]  Catherine Colin,et al.  Bubble coalescence in turbulent flows: A mechanistic model for turbulence-induced coalescence applied to microgravity bubbly pipe flow , 2001 .

[51]  Arnaudov,et al.  A Novel Fast Technique for Measuring Dynamic Surface and Interfacial Tension of Surfactant Solutions at Constant Interfacial Area. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[52]  L. Svarovsky,et al.  Solid-Liquid Separation , 2001 .

[53]  L. Tavlarides,et al.  Simulation analysis of drop breakage, coalescence and micromixing in liquid-liquid stirred tanks , 1983 .

[54]  Richard V. Calabrese,et al.  Drop breakup in turbulent stirred‐tank contactors. Part I: Effect of dispersed‐phase viscosity , 1986 .

[55]  Howard A. Stone,et al.  Dynamics of Drop Deformation and Breakup in Viscous Fluids , 1994 .

[56]  Lawrence L. Tavlarides,et al.  Description of interaction processes in agitated liquid-liquid dispersions , 1977 .

[57]  S. Chander,et al.  Kinetics of emulsification of dodecane in the absence and presence of nonionic surfactants , 2004 .

[58]  T. W. F. Russell,et al.  The design of gas sparged devices for viscous liquid systems , 1978 .

[59]  H. Svendsen,et al.  Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions , 1996 .

[60]  J. T. Davies,et al.  Drop sizes of emulsions related to turbulent energy dissipation rates , 1985 .

[61]  R. Calabrese,et al.  Drop breakup in turbulent stirred‐tank contactors. Part III: Correlations for mean size and drop size distribution , 1986 .

[62]  G. Brenn,et al.  Numerical simulation and experimental study of emulsification in a narrow-gap homogenizer , 2006 .

[63]  L. A. Cutter Flow and turbulence in a stirred tank , 1966 .

[64]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Droplet breakage in stirred dispersions. Breakage functions from experimental drop-size distributions , 1996 .

[65]  George Keith Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. , 1969 .

[66]  Hsiao Tsung Chen,et al.  Drop size distribution in agitated liquid‐liquid systems , 1967 .

[67]  N. Denkov,et al.  Wall slip and viscous dissipation in sheared foams: Effect of surface mobility , 2005 .

[68]  Anilkumar G. Gaonkar,et al.  Food processing: recent developments , 1995 .

[69]  L. Erickson,et al.  DYNAMICS OF BUBBLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN TURBULENT GAS-LIQUID DISPERSIONS , 1987 .

[70]  Richard V. Calabrese,et al.  Dispersion of viscous liquids by turbulent flow in a static mixer , 1988 .

[71]  Joakim Majander,et al.  Simulation of the population balances for liquid–liquid systems in a nonideal stirred tank. Part 2—parameter fitting and the use of the multiblock model for dense dispersions , 2002 .

[72]  J. M. Rallison The Deformation of Small Viscous Drops and Bubbles in Shear Flows , 1984 .

[73]  J. P. Gupta,et al.  Analysis of drop size distributions in lean liquid-liquid dispersions , 1980 .

[74]  Thomas Danner,et al.  Emulsification in turbulent flow 1. Mean and maximum drop diameters in inertial and viscous regimes. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[75]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Breakage functions for droplets in agitated liquid-liquid dispersions , 1984 .

[76]  K. Gandhi,et al.  Breakage of a drop of inviscid fluid due to a pressure fluctuation at its surface , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.