Sediment entrainment by debris flows: In situ measurements from the headwaters of a steep catchment

[1] Debris flows can dramatically increase their volume, and hence their destructive potential, by entraining sediment. Yet quantitative constraints on rates and mechanics of sediment entrainment by debris flows are limited. Using an in situ sensor network in the headwaters of a natural catchment we measured flow and bed properties during six erosive debris-flow events. Despite similar flow properties and thicknesses of bed sediment entrained across all events, time-averaged entrainment rates were significantly faster for bed sediment that was saturated prior to flow arrival compared with rates for sediment that was dry. Bed sediment was entrained from the sediment-surface downward in a progressive fashion and occurred during passage of dense granular fronts as well as water-rich, inter-surge flow.En massefailure of bed sediment along the sediment-bedrock interface was never observed. Large-magnitude, high-frequency fluctuations in total normal basal stress were dissipated within the upper 5 cm of bed sediment. Within this near surface layer, concomitant fluctuations in Coulomb frictional resistance are expected, irrespective of the influence of pore fluid pressure or fluctuations in shear stress. If the near-surface sediment was wet as it was overridden by a flow, additional large-magnitude, high-frequency pore pressure fluctuations were measured in the near-surface bed sediment. These pore pressure fluctuations propagated to depth at subsonic rates and in a diffusive manner. The depth to which large excess pore pressures propagated was typically less than 10 cm, but scaled as (D/fi)0.5, in which D is the hydraulic diffusivity and fiis the frequency of a particular pore pressure fluctuation. Shallow penetration depths of granular-normal-stress fluctuations and excess pore pressures demonstrate that only near-surface bed sediment experiences the full dynamic range of effective-stress fluctuations, and as a result, can be more easily entrained than deeper sediment. These data provide robust tests for mechanical models of entrainment and demonstrate that a debris flow over wet bed sediment will be larger than the same flow over dry bed sediment.

[1]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Elementary theory of bed‐sediment entrainment by debris flows and avalanches , 2012 .

[2]  Jason W. Kean,et al.  In situ measurements of post‐fire debris flows in southern California: Comparisons of the timing and magnitude of 24 debris‐flow events with rainfall and soil moisture conditions , 2011 .

[3]  F. Schlunegger,et al.  Direct measurement of channel erosion by debris flows, Illgraben, Switzerland , 2011 .

[4]  J. Godt,et al.  Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment , 2011 .

[5]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments , 2010 .

[6]  N. Mangold,et al.  Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds , 2010 .

[7]  J. W. Kean,et al.  Evolution of a natural debris flow: In situ measurements of flow dynamics, video imagery, and terrestrial laser scanning , 2010 .

[8]  F. Schlunegger,et al.  A novel method for measuring the timing of bed erosion during debris flows and floods , 2010 .

[9]  R. Guthrie,et al.  An examination of controls on debris flow mobility: Evidence from coastal British Columbia , 2010 .

[10]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Frequency, electrical conductivity and temperature analysis of a low-cost capacitance soil moisture sensor , 2008 .

[11]  J. E. Gartner,et al.  Empirical models to predict the volumes of debris flows generated by recently burned basins in the western U.S. , 2008 .

[12]  J. E. Gartner,et al.  Sources of debris flow material in burned areas , 2008 .

[13]  David A. Kinner,et al.  Initiation conditions for debris flows generated by runoff at Chalk Cliffs, central Colorado , 2008 .

[14]  Kaare Høeg,et al.  Erosion and morphology of a debris flow caused by a glacial lake outburst flood, Western Norway , 2008 .

[15]  F. Bouchut,et al.  On new erosion models of Savage–Hutter type for avalanches , 2008 .

[16]  Tamotsu Takahashi,et al.  Debris Flow: Mechanics, Prediction and Countermeasures , 2007 .

[17]  Jeffrey A. Coe,et al.  Alpine debris flows triggered by a 28 July 1999 thunderstorm in the central Front Range, Colorado , 2007 .

[18]  S. Baloga,et al.  Toward a model for the bulking and debulking of lahars , 2006 .

[19]  Kevin M. Scott,et al.  Catastrophic precipitation‐triggered lahar at Casita volcano, Nicaragua: occurrence, bulking and transformation , 2005 .

[20]  M. Papa,et al.  Critical conditions of bed sediment entrainment due to debris flow , 2004 .

[21]  Kyoji Sassa,et al.  Downslope volume enlargement of a debris slide–debris flow in the 1999 Hiroshima, Japan, rainstorm , 2003 .

[22]  C. May.  DEBRIS FLOWS THROUGH DIFFERENT FOREST AGE CLASSES IN THE CENTRAL OREGON COAST RANGE 1 , 2002 .

[23]  R J Fannin,et al.  An empirical-statistical model for debris flow travel distance , 2001 .

[24]  M. Parise,et al.  Wildfire-related debris-flow initiation processes, Storm King Mountain, Colorado , 2001 .

[25]  J. N. Hutchinson,et al.  A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type , 2001 .

[26]  Pilar García-Navarro,et al.  1D Mathematical modelling of debris flow , 2000 .

[27]  D. Brien,et al.  Acute sensitivity of landslide rates to initial soil porosity. , 2000, Science.

[28]  S. Cannon,et al.  Conditions for generation of fire-related debris flows, Capulin Canyon, New Mexico , 2000 .

[29]  O. Hungr.  Analysis of debris flow surges using the theory of uniformly progressive flow , 2000 .

[30]  Alessandro Simoni,et al.  Field observations of a debris flow event in the Dolomites , 1999 .

[31]  Martin G. Miller.  ACTIVE BREACHING OF A GEOMETRIC SEGMENT BOUNDARY IN THE SAWATCH RANGE NORMAL FAULT, COLORADO, USA , 1999 .

[32]  S. Egashira,et al.  Experimental study on the entrainment of bed material into debris flow , 1999 .

[33]  J. Vallance,et al.  OBJECTIVE DELINEATION OF LAHAR-INUNDATION HAZARD ZONES , 1998 .

[34]  S. Wells,et al.  Fire-Related Sedimentation Events on Alluvial Fans, Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. , 1997 .

[35]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Debris-flow mobilization from landslides , 1997 .

[36]  J. Vallance,et al.  The Osceola Mudflow from Mount Rainier: Sedimentology and hazard implications of a huge clay-rich debris flow , 1997 .

[37]  R. Iverson,et al.  Differential equations governing slip-induced pore-pressure fluctuations in a water-saturated granular medium , 1993 .

[38]  Hajime Nakagawa,et al.  Routing Debris Flows with Particle Segregation , 1992 .

[39]  M. Bovis,et al.  Debris flow triggering by impulsive loading: mechanical modelling and case studies , 1992 .

[40]  Salvatore Torquato,et al.  Random Heterogeneous Media: Microstructure and Improved Bounds on Effective Properties , 1991 .

[41]  L. Benda.  The influence of debris flows on channels and valley floors in the Oregon Coast Range, U.S.A. , 1990 .

[42]  R. Janda,et al.  Perturbation and melting of snow and ice by the 13 November 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz, Colombia, and consequent mobilization, flow and deposition of lahars , 1990 .

[43]  R. Iverson,et al.  Dynamic Pore-Pressure Fluctuations in Rapidly Shearing Granular Materials , 1989, Science.

[44]  Oldrich Hungr,et al.  Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures , 1984 .

[45]  H. Suwa,et al.  Dissection of valleys by debris flows , 1980 .

[46]  T. Pierson,et al.  Erosion and deposition by debris flows at Mt Thomas, North Canterbury, New Zealand , 1980 .

[47]  Tamotsu Takahashi,et al.  Mechanical Characteristics of Debris Flow , 1978 .

[48]  J. Rice,et al.  Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid‐saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents , 1976 .

[49]  J. N. Hutchinson,et al.  Undrained Loading, A Fundamental Mechanism of Mudflows and other Mass Movements , 1971 .

[50]  M. Biot.  Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid‐Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low‐Frequency Range , 1956 .

[51]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1952 .

[52]  G. Tucker,et al.  Observations of debris flows at Chalk Cliffs, Colorado, USA: Part 1, in-situ measurements of flow dynamics, tracer particle movement and video imagery from the summer of 2009 , 2011 .

[53]  G. Lube,et al.  Quantifying the geomorphic impacts of a lake-breakout lahar, Mount Ruapehu, New Zealand , 2010 .

[54]  J. Coe,et al.  Chalk Creek Valley: Colorado's natural debris-flow laboratory , 2010 .

[55]  Scott McDougall,et al.  Entrainment of material by debris flows , 2005 .

[56]  R. Iverson,et al.  Debris-flow mechanics , 2005 .

[57]  Dieter Rickenmann,et al.  Runout prediction methods , 2005 .

[58]  K. Sassa,et al.  Mechanism of landslide-triggered debris flows: Liquefaction phenomena due to the undrained loading of torrent deposits , 2005 .

[59]  T. Pierson,et al.  Hyperconcentrated flow — transitional process between water flow and debris flow , 2005 .

[60]  Francesco M. Guadagno,et al.  Velocity and runout simulation of destructive debris flows and debris avalanches in pyroclastic deposits, Campania region, Italy , 2004 .

[61]  D. Rickenmann,et al.  Erosion by debris flows in field and laboratory experiments , 2003 .

[62]  E. Gabet.  Sediment transport by dry ravel , 2003 .

[63]  J. Major.  Gravity-Driven Consolidation of Granular Slurries--Implications for Debris-Flow Deposition and Deposit Characteristics , 2000 .

[64]  Dieter Rickenmann,et al.  Empirical Relationships for Debris Flows , 1999 .

[65]  John E. Costa,et al.  Physical Geomorphology of Debris Flows , 1984 .

[66]  T. Pierson,et al.  The 1980 Polallie Creek debris flow and subsequent dam-break flood, East Fork Hood River basin, Oregon , 1984 .

[67]  R. Iverson,et al.  U. S. Geological Survey , 1967, Radiocarbon.