Acute skeletal muscle responses to very low‐load resistance exercise with and without the application of blood flow restriction in the upper body

The purpose was to examine the acute skeletal muscle response to high load exercise and low‐load exercise with and without different levels of applied pressure (BFR). A total of 22 participants completed the following four conditions: elbow flexion exercise to failure using a traditional high load [70% 1RM, (7000)], low load [15% 1RM,(1500)], low load with moderate BFR [15%1RM+40%BFR(1540)] or low load with greater BFR [15% 1RM+80%BFR(1580)]. Torque and muscle thickness were measured prior to, immediately post, and 15 min postexercise. Muscle electromyography (EMG) amplitude was measured throughout. Immediately following exercise, the 7000 condition had lower muscle thickness [4·2(1·0)cm] compared to the 1500 [4·4 (1·1)cm], 1540 [4·4(1·1)cm] and 1580 [4·5(1·0)cm] conditions. This continued 15 min post. Immediately following exercise, torque was lower in the 1500 [31·8 (20) Nm], 1540 [28·3(16·9) Nm, P<0·001] and 1580 [29·5 (17) Nm] conditions compared to the 7000 condition [40 (19) Nm]. Fifteen minutes post, 1500 and 1540 conditions demonstrated lower torque compared to the 7000 condition. For the last three repetitions percentage EMG was greater in the 7000 compared to the 1580 condition. Very low‐load exercise (with or without BFR) appears to result in greater acute muscle swelling and greater muscular fatigue compared to high load exercise.

[1]  J. Loenneke,et al.  The acute muscular response to blood flow‐restricted exercise with very low relative pressure , 2018, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[2]  T. Beck,et al.  Low‐load resistance training with low relative pressure produces muscular changes similar to high‐load resistance training , 2017, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  T. Abe,et al.  The influence of exercise load with and without different levels of blood flow restriction on acute changes in muscle thickness and lactate , 2017, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[4]  J. Loenneke,et al.  Are higher blood flow restriction pressures more beneficial when lower loads are used? , 2017, Physiology international.

[5]  J. Loenneke,et al.  Training to Fatigue: The Answer for Standardization When Assessing Muscle Hypertrophy? , 2017, Sports Medicine.

[6]  J. Loenneke,et al.  The acute and chronic effects of “NO LOAD” resistance training , 2016, Physiology & Behavior.

[7]  T. Abe,et al.  Influence of relative blood flow restriction pressure on muscle activation and muscle adaptation , 2016, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  T. Abe,et al.  Influence of cuff material on blood flow restriction stimulus in the upper body , 2016, The Journal of Physiological Sciences.

[9]  K. Vissing,et al.  Blood flow restricted and traditional resistance training performed to fatigue produce equal muscle hypertrophy , 2015, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[10]  C. Ugrinowitsch,et al.  Effects of exercise intensity and occlusion pressure after 12 weeks of resistance training with blood-flow restriction , 2015, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[11]  Daniel L. Feeback,et al.  Muscular adaptations to fatiguing exercise with and without blood flow restriction , 2015, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[12]  C. Ugrinowitsch,et al.  Comparisons Between Low-Intensity Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction and High-Intensity Resistance Training on Quadriceps Muscle Mass and Strength in Elderly , 2015, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[13]  D. Cleather,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF REPETITIONS PERFORMED AT GIVEN INTENSITIES IS DIFFERENT IN ENDURANCE AND STRENGTH TRAINED ATHLETES , 2014, Biology of sport.

[14]  T. Abe,et al.  The acute muscle swelling effects of blood flow restriction. , 2012, Acta physiologica Hungarica.

[15]  T. Abe,et al.  Effects of high-intensity and blood flow-restricted low-intensity resistance training on carotid arterial compliance: role of blood pressure during training sessions , 2012, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[16]  J. Loenneke,et al.  Blood flow restriction reduces time to muscular failure , 2012 .

[17]  C. Ugrinowitsch,et al.  Strength training with blood flow restriction diminishes myostatin gene expression. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  Joshua G. A. Cashaback,et al.  Muscle time under tension during resistance exercise stimulates differential muscle protein sub‐fractional synthetic responses in men , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  T. Abe,et al.  The anabolic benefits of venous blood flow restriction training may be induced by muscle cell swelling. , 2012, Medical hypotheses.

[20]  A. Kacin,et al.  Frequent low‐load ischemic resistance exercise to failure enhances muscle oxygen delivery and endurance capacity , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[21]  L. Ploutz-Snyder,et al.  Skeletal muscle adaptations following blood flow-restricted training during 30 days of muscular unloading. , 2010, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  M. Kjaer,et al.  Changes in muscle size and MHC composition in response to resistance exercise with heavy and light loading intensity. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  Lori L. Ploutz-Snyder,et al.  Sex differences in muscle fatigability and activation patterns of the human quadriceps femoris , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[24]  J. Caprini,et al.  A Guide to Venous Thromboembolism Risk Factor Assessment , 2004, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[25]  Y. Iwase,et al.  Low-load resistance muscular training with moderate restriction of blood flow after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[26]  D. Häussinger,et al.  Cellular hydration state: an important determinant of protein catabolism in health and disease , 1993, The Lancet.