Facebook as a tool for respondent tracing

In longitudinal research projects, respondents’ contact information such as address, telephone, and email can become out-of-date. Some researchers have searched Facebook for these unreachable respondents, with the hope of sending them a private message that asks them to provide the needed follow-up data. Published reports of research that used Facebook that way raise several questions: When should researchers conclude that a Facebook user is actually the respondent they are seeking? How should researchers word their message? To what extent is respondent tracing through Facebook likely to reduce nonresponse bias? Is communication using Facebook sufficiently confidential? This paper discusses these questions and presents Westat’s own use of Facebook to trace respondents in a longitudinal evaluation of an intervention for youth in foster care. The paper discusses the implications of ourwork for future research practice.

[1]  Devon M. Berry,et al.  Successfully recruiting, surveying, and retaining college students: a description of methods for the Risk, Religiosity, and Emerging Adulthood Study. , 2012, Research in nursing & health.

[2]  L. Calderwood Tracking sample members in longitudinal studies , 2012 .

[3]  R. Mychasiuk,et al.  Facebook: an effective tool for participant retention in longitudinal research. , 2012, Child: care, health and development.

[4]  Deborah Rohm Young,et al.  Recruiting adolescent girls into a follow-up study: benefits of using a social networking website. , 2012, Contemporary clinical trials.

[5]  M. Brecht,et al.  Using Facebook to Maximize Follow-Up Response Rates in a Longitudinal Study of Adults Who Use Methamphetamine , 2012, Substance abuse : research and treatment.

[6]  Bryan B. Rhodes,et al.  Using Facebook to Locate Sample Members , 2011 .

[7]  J. Kotch,et al.  Using Social Networking Sites in Subject Tracing , 2011 .

[8]  C. Daniel,et al.  Approaches for Longitudinally Tracking Graduates of NCI-Funded Short-Term Cancer Research Training Programs , 2011, Journal of Cancer Education.

[9]  T. Wells,et al.  Assessing nonresponse bias at follow-up in a large prospective cohort of relatively young and mobile military service members , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[10]  Eric Rice,et al.  Online Social Networking Technologies, HIV Knowledge, and Sexual Risk and Testing Behaviors Among Homeless Youth , 2010, AIDS and Behavior.

[11]  M. Seed,et al.  Improving recruitment and retention rates in preventive longitudinal research with adolescent mothers. , 2009, Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc.

[12]  Sandra L. Bell,et al.  Attrition in longitudinal studies: who do you lose? , 2006, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[13]  J. Behrman,et al.  Attrition in longitudinal household survey data , 2000 .