Reuse of honey jars for healthier bees: Developing a sustainable honey jars supply chain through the use of LCA

Abstract This study aims at improving the environmental sustainability of an existing honey production supply chain, pursuing the Sustainable Supply Chain Management philosophy and the Life Cycle Assessment principles. Focusing the attention on the packaging stage and, in particular, on the most commonly used honey packaging solution, the glass jar, this study assesses the environmental burdens associated with its manufacturing, distribution and final disposal. Once the “AS-IS” honey packaging situation of an Italian province has been analyzed, parallel packaging reuse scenarios and redistribution supply chains are modelled, involving different levels of collaboration between the honey producers and the provincial beekeeping consortium. These scenarios have been then compared to the AS-IS situation, taking into account five environmental factors important for the honeybee's survival: the carbon dioxide equivalent emission, the triethylene glycol equivalent emissions into water and soil, the sulfur dioxide equivalent emission into air and the m2 equivalent reduction of organic arable land per year. The outcomes show how the adoption of a packaging reuse policy together with a producer collaboration policy could bring, in five years, to reduce those factors on average of 16% (with a 10% packaging reuse rate), up to more than 70% (with an 85% packaging reuse rate).

[1]  Teresa M. Mata,et al.  Life cycle assessment of different reuse percentages for glass beer bottles , 2001 .

[2]  N. Raghu Kisore,et al.  Improving ATM coverage area using density based clustering algorithm and voronoi diagrams , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Doron Lavee,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of a deposit-refund program for beverage containers in Israel. , 2010, Waste management.

[4]  A. Verghese,et al.  Plant-Pollinator Interactions: A Highly Evolved Synchrony at Risk Due to Climate Change , 2013 .

[5]  Andreas Detzel,et al.  Environmental evaluation of aluminium cans for beverages in the German context , 2009 .

[6]  Rosemary Hill,et al.  The assessment report on pollinators, pollination and food production: summary for policymakers , 2016 .

[7]  M. Navajas,et al.  Climate change: impact on honey bee populations and diseases. , 2008, Revue scientifique et technique.

[8]  P. Rousseeuw.  Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[9]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Esfandiar Eslami,et al.  On Hesitant Fuzzy Clustering and Clustering of Hesitant Fuzzy Data , 2017, Fuzzy Sets, Rough Sets, Multisets and Clustering.

[11]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R , 2008, Bioinform..

[12]  Michela Vellini,et al.  Energy and environmental analysis of glass container production and recycling , 2009 .

[13]  Graziella Benedetto,et al.  Delving into the environmental aspect of a Sardinian white wine: from partial to total life cycle assessment. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Pat Willmer,et al.  Environmental physiology of animals , 1976 .

[15]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of protected crops: an Italian case study , 2012 .

[16]  Luis Angel García-Escudero,et al.  Robust Fuzzy Clustering via Trimming and Constraints , 2016, SMPS.

[17]  A. Verghese,et al.  Potential impact of climate change on honeybees (Apis spp.) and their pollination services , 2012 .

[18]  Sina Khanmohammadi,et al.  An improved overlapping k-means clustering method for medical applications , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  C. Searcy,et al.  A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management , 2013 .

[20]  L. Hoffmann,et al.  Correlations between land covers and honey bee colony losses in a country with industrialized and rural regions. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  S. Gieseg,et al.  Warming, CO2, and nitrogen deposition interactively affect a plant-pollinator mutualism. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[22]  C. Polce,et al.  Pollinators in life cycle assessment: towards a framework for impact assessment , 2017 .

[23]  Julian Cleary,et al.  Life cycle assessments of wine and spirit packaging at the product and the municipal scale: a Toronto, Canada case study , 2013 .

[24]  Csaba Szentes,et al.  Risk assessment of pesticides and other stressors in bees: Principles, data gaps and perspectives from the European Food Safety Authority. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Mourad Ben Amor,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment of beverage packaging systems: focus on the collection of post-consumer bottles , 2016 .

[26]  E. Santalla,et al.  Carbon footprint of honey produced in Argentina , 2016 .

[27]  Giuseppe Vignali,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a packaged tomato puree: a comparison of environmental impacts produced by different life cycle phases , 2014 .

[28]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Building a More Complete Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Case Studies of 10 Exemplars , 2009 .

[29]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  Methodology Review: Clustering Methods , 1987 .

[30]  Montse Meneses,et al.  The carbon footprint and energy consumption of beverage packaging selection and disposal , 2011 .

[31]  Cristina Gazulla,et al.  Taking a life cycle look at crianza wine production in Spain: where are the bottlenecks? , 2010 .

[32]  Billy G. Holland,et al.  Customer Usage Space Classification and Representative Duty Cycle Development Using K-Means Clustering , 2017 .

[33]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  The ecological relevance of transport in waste disposal systems in Western Europe. , 2007, Waste management.