How does the position of firms in the supply chain affect their performance? An empirical study

The relationship between a firm and its supply chain has been well studied, however, the association between the position of firms in complex supply chain networks and their performance has not been adequately investigated. This is primarily due to insufficient availability of empirical data on large-scale networks. To addresses this gap in the literature, we investigate the relationship between embeddedness patterns of individual firms in a supply network and their performance using empirical data from the automotive industry. In this study, we devise three measures that characterize the embeddedness of individual firms in a supply network. These are namely: centrality, tier position, and triads. Our findings caution us that centrality impacts individual performance through a diminishing returns relationship. The second measure, tier position, allows us to investigate the concept of tiers in supply networks because we find that as networks emerge, the boundaries between tiers become unclear. Performance of suppliers degrade as they move away from the focal firm (i.e., Toyota). The final measure, triads, investigates the effect of buying and selling to firms that supply the same customer, portraying the level of competition and cooperation in a supplier’s network. We find that increased coopetition (i.e., cooperative competition) is a performance enhancer, however, excessive complexity resulting from being involved in both upstream and downstream coopetition results in diminishing performance. These original insights help understand the drivers of firm performance from a network perspective and provide a basis for further research.

[1]  R. Schmenner,et al.  On theory in operations management , 1998 .

[2]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  A Theory of the Nexus Supplier: A Critical Supplier from a Network Perspective , 2014 .

[3]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[4]  B. David.  The iron cage revisited : Institutional isomorphism and collec... , 2007 .

[5]  Rajan R. Kamath,et al.  Strategic Industrial Sourcing. The Japanese Advantage , 1995 .

[6]  Hiroyuki Okamuro,et al.  Risk sharing in the supplier relationship: new evidence from the Japanese automotive industry , 2001 .

[7]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[8]  Alexandra Brintrup,et al.  Supply network science: Emergence of a new perspective on a classical field. , 2018, Chaos.

[9]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of social capital on buyer performance improvement , 2008 .

[10]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies , 2005 .

[11]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[12]  Duncan McFarlane,et al.  Extracting supply chain maps from news articles using deep neural networks , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[13]  Pietro Panzarasa,et al.  Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance , 2017, Appl. Netw. Sci..

[14]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[15]  Alexandre Beaudet,et al.  The Toyota Group and the Aisin Fire , 1998 .

[16]  A. Dubois,et al.  Co-operating and competing in supply networks: Making sense of a triadic sourcing strategy , 2008 .

[17]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[18]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[19]  S. Borgatti,et al.  On Social Network Analysis in a Supply Chain Context , 2009 .

[20]  Tsutomu Watanabe,et al.  Do Larger Firms Have More Interfirm Relationships , 2007 .

[21]  S. Borgatti,et al.  On Social Network Analysis in a Supply Chain Context , 2009 .

[22]  Misako Takayasu,et al.  Network motifs in an inter-firm network , 2010 .

[23]  Joel Podolny.  A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  W. Souma,et al.  Program for Promoting Social Science Research Aimed at Solutions of Near-Future Problems Design of Interfirm Network to Achieve Sustainable Economic Growth The Structure and Evolution of Buyer-Supplier Networks , 2014 .

[25]  J. Jaccard,et al.  The Detection and Interpretation of Interaction Effects Between Continuous Variables in Multiple Regression. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[26]  R. Tibshirani.  Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[27]  Kunal Banerji,et al.  The effect of keiretsu affiliation and resource dependencies on supplier firm performance in the Japanese automobile industry , 2006 .

[28]  Wenpin Tsai,et al.  Niche and Performance: The Moderating Role of Network Embeddedness , 2005 .

[29]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[30]  William M. Evan,et al.  Toward a Theory of Inter-Organizational Relations , 1965 .

[31]  Florian Kohlbacher,et al.  Co-opetition and knowledge co-creation in Japanese supplier-networks: The case of Toyota , 2011 .

[32]  Petr Matous,et al.  International propagation of economic shocks through global supply chains , 2018 .

[33]  Yoshi Fujiwara,et al.  Large-scale structure of a nation-wide production network , 2008, 0806.4280.

[34]  Banri Asanuma.  Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill , 1989 .

[35]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Built to Last but Falling Apart: Cohesion, Friction, and Withdrawal from Interfirm Alliances , 2010 .

[36]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: embeddedness and the firm's debt performance , 2002 .

[37]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[39]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[40]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach , 2011 .

[43]  J. Lincoln,et al.  Whither the Keiretsu, Japan's Business Networks? How Were They Structured? What Did They Do? Why Are They Gone? , 2009 .

[44]  Cecil Bozarth,et al.  The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance , 2009 .

[45]  B. Loasby.  The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[46]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[47]  Yasuyuki Todo,et al.  Firm-level propagation of shocks through supply-chain networks , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[48]  Misako Takayasu,et al.  Hubs and Authorities on Japanese Inter-Firm Network : Characterization of Nodes in Very Large Directed Networks(Complex Networks,Econophysics-Physical Approach to Social and Economic Phenomena-) , 2009 .

[49]  Steve New,et al.  From transaction cost economics to food webs: A multi-disciplinary discussion on the length of supply chains , 2011 .

[50]  Julien Sauvagnat,et al.  Input Specificity and the Propagation of Idiosyncratic Shocks in Production Networks , 2015 .

[51]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[52]  Petr Matous,et al.  How Do Supply Chain Networks Affect the Resilience of Firms to Natural Disasters? Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake , 2015 .

[53]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[54]  D. Krackhardt.  Simmelian Ties: Super Strong and Sticky , 1998 .

[55]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[56]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[57]  A. Ackere,et al.  Systems thinking and business process redesign: An application to the beer game , 1993 .

[58]  Duncan C. McFarlane,et al.  Predicting Hidden Links in Supply Networks , 2018, Complex..

[59]  J. Raab,et al.  Powell (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[60]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Manufacturing Relations: An Empirical Study of the Organization of Production Across Multiple Networks , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[61]  P. Scarf,et al.  On the relationship between financial performance and position of businesses in supply chain networks , 2020, International Journal of Production Economics.

[62]  Yuichi Ikeda,et al.  Identification of key companies for international profit shifting in the Global Ownership Network , 2019, Applied Network Science.

[63]  Joan M Phillips,et al.  A Balance Theory Perspective of Triadic Supply Chain Relationships , 1998 .

[64]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  The Role of Ego Network Structure in Facilitating Ego Network Innovations , 2015 .

[65]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital , 2000 .

[66]  A Case Study of Operational Failure in Home Healthcare , 2004, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[67]  Andrew B. Bernard,et al.  Geography and Firm Performance in the Japanese Production Network , 2014 .

[68]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability , 2006 .

[69]  F. Rothaermel.  Strategic Management Journal Research Note Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation , 2022 .