Emissions trading: lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase

In January 2005, the European Union launched an EU-wide emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) for CO 2 emissions. It covers approximately 45% of total CO 2 emissions and is thus the largest ‘cap-and-trade’ carbon trading scheme in the world – an ambitious and highly challenging policy experiment. As it emerges from its pilot phase and prepares for phase II, the EU ETS now stands at a crossroad: will it quickly address the problems experienced in phase I and establish strong price signals in Europe, or will the prevailing uncertainty continue into phase II? Phase I has indeed proved how much market design matters to its operation and signalling. Unlike normal markets, emissions trading schemes are designed markets, where the demand and supply are dependent on government decisions. The volume of allowance allocation determines scarcity levels and thus the effectiveness of the scheme. Furthermore, the various provisions in the allocation plans can influence investment and operational choices and thus the efficiency of the scheme. Decisions on auctioning and free allocation, as well as on how to split the allocation pie across sectors and installations, will also have distributional consequences. This special issue presents seven articles that consider the influence of allowance allocation, and inform the debate surrounding ‘National allocation plans in the EU ETS: lessons and implications for phase II’. Five articles focus on recent experience with the design of national allocation plans (NAPs) for the period 2008–2012 and provide qualitative and quantitative assessments. These are complemented by two numerical simulations of trade and distributional effects. We summarize their findings in the context of the debate, which we structure into the three key criteria for ETS assessment: market efficiency; distributional effects, and environmental effectiveness.

[1]  Angela Köppl,et al.  Stringency and Distribution in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme - The 2005 Evidence , 2007 .

[2]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  An early assessment of national allocation plans for phase 2 of EU emission trading , 2006 .

[3]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector , 2006 .

[4]  P. González Harmonization versus decentralization in the EU ETS: an economic analysis , 2006 .

[5]  Federico Ferrario,et al.  Implications of announced phase II national allocation plans for the EU ETS , 2006 .

[6]  M. Grubb,et al.  Emission projections 2008–2012 versus national allocation plans II , 2006 .

[7]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview , 2006 .

[8]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  Simple rules for targeting CO2 allowance allocations to compensate firms , 2006 .

[9]  M. Grubb,et al.  False confidences: forecasting errors and emission caps in CO2 trading systems , 2006 .

[10]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  EU emissions trading: an early analysis of national allocation plans for 2008–2012 , 2006 .

[11]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation , 2006 .

[12]  C. Hepburn,et al.  The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices , 2006 .

[13]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why? , 2006 .

[14]  A. Ellerman,et al.  Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU Ets Based on the 2005 Emissions Data , 2006 .

[15]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme Based on the 2005 Emissions Data , 2006 .

[16]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU Ets Based on the 2005 Emissions Data , 2006 .

[17]  Claudia Kemfert,et al.  The environmental and economic effects of European emissions trading , 2006 .

[18]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory , 1972 .

[19]  K. Holmgren,et al.  New entrant allocation in the Nordic energy sectors: incentives and options in the EU ETS , 2006 .