Measure to Succeed: How to Improve Employee Participation in Continuous Improvement

Purpose: Achieving employee participation in continuous improvement (CI) systems is considered as one of the success factors for the sustainability of those systems. Yet, it is also very difficult to obtain because of the interaction of many critical factors that affect employee participation. Therefore, finding ways of measuring all these critical factors can help practitioners manage the employee participation process accordingly. Design/methodology/approach: Based upon the existing literature, this paper presents a 4-Phase (9 steps) diagnostic tool to measure the main determinants associated with the implementation of CI systems affecting employee participation in improvement activities. Findings: The tool showed its usefulness to detect the main weaknesses and improvement opportunities for improving employee participation in CI through the application in two different cases. Practical implications: This diagnostic tool could be particularly interesting for companies adopting CI and other excellence frameworks, which usually include a pillar related to people development inside the organization, but do not include tools to diagnose the state of this pillar. Originality/value: This diagnostic tool presents a user’s perspective approach, ensuring that the weaknesses and improvement opportunities detected during the diagnose come directly from the users of the CI system, which in this case are the employees themselves. Given that the final objective is to identify reasons and problems hindering employee participation, adopting this user’s perspective approach seem more relevant than adopting other more traditional approaches, based on gathering information from the CI system itself or from the CI managers.

[1]  Jesús García-Arca,et al.  Systematic personnel participation for logistics improvement: A case study , 2011 .

[2]  Zhongjun Tang,et al.  Using behavior theory to investigate individual-level determinants of employee involvement in TQM , 2010 .

[3]  Jorge L. García,et al.  Human critical success factors for kaizen and its impacts in industrial performance , 2014 .

[4]  Paul Walsh,et al.  An integrative framework for measuring the extent to which organizational variables influence the success of process improvement programs , 2005 .

[5]  N. Bateman Sustainability: the elusive element of process improvement , 2005 .

[6]  Juan A. Marin-Garcia,et al.  Is implementation of continuous improvement possible? An evolutionary model of enablers and inhibitors , 2012 .

[7]  Jorge L. García,et al.  Critical success factors for Kaizen implementation in manufacturing industries in Mexico , 2013 .

[8]  Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park,et al.  Lean Production, Six Sigma Quality, TQM and Company Culture , 2006 .

[9]  Antonio García-Lorenzo,et al.  Employee participation systems in Spain. Past, present and future , 2003 .

[10]  King-Jang Yang,et al.  An Integrated Model of the Toyota Production System with Total Quality Management and People Factors , 2013 .

[11]  Lilian M. de Menezes,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Quality Management: An Empirical Analysis , 2012 .

[12]  Martín Tanco,et al.  What motivates employees to participate in continuous improvement activities? , 2017 .

[13]  Marco Lam,et al.  Achieving Employee Commitment for Continuous Improvement Initiatives , 2012 .

[14]  Hale Kaynak,et al.  The relationship between total quality management: practices and their effects on firm performance , 2003 .

[15]  E. Viles,et al.  Components of sustainable improvement systems: theory and practice , 2012 .

[16]  Martín Tanco,et al.  Continuous improvement leaders, followers and laggards: understanding system sustainability , 2018 .

[17]  Jörgen Eklund,et al.  Sustainable development of a suggestion system: Factors influencing improvement activities in a confectionary company , 2007 .

[18]  Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park Core values – the entrance to human satisfaction and commitment , 2012 .