Mapping biomass with remote sensing: a comparison of methods for the case study of Uganda

BackgroundAssessing biomass is gaining increasing interest mainly for bioenergy, climate change research and mitigation activities, such as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries (REDD+). In response to these needs, a number of biomass/carbon maps have been recently produced using different approaches but the lack of comparable reference data limits their proper validation. The objectives of this study are to compare the available maps for Uganda and to understand the sources of variability in the estimation. Uganda was chosen as a case-study because it presents a reliable national biomass reference dataset.ResultsThe comparison of the biomass/carbon maps show strong disagreement between the products, with estimates of total aboveground biomass of Uganda ranging from 343 to 2201 Tg and different spatial distribution patterns. Compared to the reference map based on country-specific field data and a national Land Cover (LC) dataset (estimating 468 Tg), maps based on biome-average biomass values, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) default values, and global LC datasets tend to strongly overestimate biomass availability of Uganda (ranging from 578 to 2201 Tg), while maps based on satellite data and regression models provide conservative estimates (ranging from 343 to 443 Tg). The comparison of the maps predictions with field data, upscaled to map resolution using LC data, is in accordance with the above findings. This study also demonstrates that the biomass estimates are primarily driven by the biomass reference data while the type of spatial maps used for their stratification has a smaller, but not negligible, impact. The differences in format, resolution and biomass definition used by the maps, as well as the fact that some datasets are not independent from the reference data to which they are compared, are considered in the interpretation of the results.ConclusionsThe strong disagreement between existing products and the large impact of biomass reference data on the estimates indicate that the first, critical step to improve the accuracy of the biomass maps consists of the collection of accurate biomass field data for all relevant vegetation types. However, detailed and accurate spatial datasets are crucial to obtain accurate estimates at specific locations.

[1]  J. S. Olson,et al.  Major world ecosystem complexes ranked by carbon in live vegetation: a database , 1985 .

[2]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing. I - Scene models and simulated images. II - Real digital images , 1988 .

[3]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing: I , 1988 .

[4]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Tropical Africa: Land Use, Biomass, and Carbon Estimates for 1980 (NDP-055) , 1996 .

[5]  Nels Johnson,et al.  The last frontier forests: ecosystems and economies on the edge. What is the status of the worlds remaining large natural forest ecosystems? , 1997 .

[6]  A. Lugo,et al.  Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests , 1997 .

[7]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  State and change in carbon pools in the forests of tropical Africa , 1998 .

[8]  R. Houghton.  The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990* , 1999 .

[9]  F. Achard,et al.  Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical Forests , 2002, Science.

[10]  J. Townshend,et al.  Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global Percent Tree Cover at a Spatial Resolution of 500 Meters: First Results of the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields Algorithm , 2003 .

[12]  S. Fritz,et al.  A new land‐cover map of Africa for the year 2000 , 2004 .

[13]  Frédéric Achard,et al.  Improved estimates of net carbon emissions from land cover change in the tropics for the 1990s , 2004 .

[14]  United Kingdom,et al.  GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 2005 , 2005 .

[15]  R. Houghton,et al.  Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance , 2005 .

[16]  R. Drigo.  Spatial woodfuel production and consumption analysis of selected African countries , 2005 .

[17]  G. Engelen,et al.  Map Comparison Kit 3: User Manual , 2006 .

[18]  Hans Visser,et al.  The Map Comparison Kit , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  J. Goldammer.  Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 – Thematic report on forest fires in the Central Asian Region and adjacent countries / FAO Fire Management Working Paper 16 , 2006 .

[20]  R. Houghton,et al.  Emissions of carbon from land use change in sub‐Saharan Africa , 2006 .

[21]  Alex Hagen-Zanker,et al.  Comparing continuous valued raster data: a cross disciplinary literature scan , 2006 .

[22]  Omar Masera,et al.  WISDOM: A GIS-based supply demand mapping tool for woodfuel management , 2006 .

[23]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality , 2007 .

[24]  J. V. Soares,et al.  Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin , 2007 .

[25]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  A Global Forest Growing Stock, Biomass and Carbon Map Based on FAO Statistics , 2008 .

[26]  S. Goetz,et al.  Reply to Comment on ‘A first map of tropical Africa’s above-ground biomass derived from satellite imagery’ , 2008, Environmental Research Letters.

[27]  Holly K. Gibbs,et al.  New IPCC Tier-1 Global Biomass Carbon Map for the Year 2000 , 2008 .

[28]  Frédéric Achard,et al.  GLOBCOVER : The most detailed portrait of Earth , 2008 .

[29]  S. Goetz,et al.  Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks with satellite observations: a comparison of methods , 2009, Carbon balance and management.

[30]  P. Waggoner,et al.  Forest inventories: discrepancies and uncertainties. , 2009 .

[31]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2009 .

[32]  I. Woodhouse,et al.  Using satellite radar backscatter to predict above‐ground woody biomass: A consistent relationship across four different African landscapes , 2009 .

[33]  M. Lefsky.  A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System , 2010 .

[34]  R. Valentini,et al.  Implementation of REDD+ in sub-Saharan Africa: state of knowledge, challenges and opportunities , 2011, Environment and Development Economics.

[35]  W. Salas,et al.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  M. Herold,et al.  Monitoring, reporting and verification for national REDD + programmes: two proposals , 2011 .

[37]  A. Baccini,et al.  Capabilities and limitations of Landsat and land cover data for aboveground woody biomass estimation of Uganda , 2012 .