Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies

Climate change mitigation and its related reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is one of the most important challenges facing society. The major cause of the problem and the key to its solution are GHG‐intensive firms that emit vast amounts of anthropogenic GHG emissions. The study reported herein aims to increase our understanding of the climate change mitigation strategies of these firms, in particular their antecedents and effects. A comprehensive conceptual model is proposed and tested empirically based on a survey of 247 firms that participated in the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme in the first two trading periods. We find that market pressures for reducing GHG emissions, perceived GHG‐related regulatory uncertainty and environmental strategy focus are important determinants of corporate GHG reduction strategies which, in turn, enhance GHG‐related performance. We also show that the results vary depending on the type of emissions.

[1]  Michael W. Toffel,et al.  Responding to Public and Private Politics: Corporate Disclosure of Climate Change Strategies , 2009 .

[2]  M. Sanin,et al.  Understanding volatility dynamics in the EU-ETS market , 2009 .

[3]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[4]  Ella Mae Matsumura,et al.  Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures , 2014 .

[5]  C. Besio,et al.  Morality, Ethics, and Values Outside and Inside Organizations: An Example of the Discourse on Climate Change , 2014 .

[6]  Yong Liu,et al.  An empirical research of awareness, behavior and barriers to enact carbon management of industrial firms in China. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Janek Ratnatunga,et al.  Carbon strategies and management practices in an uncertain carbonomic environment – lessons learned from the coal-face , 2015 .

[8]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  The value of technology and of its evolution towards a low carbon economy , 2012, Climatic Change.

[9]  A. Verbeke,et al.  The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy , 2017 .

[10]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  A Tale of Three Perspectives , 2009 .

[11]  S. Sangle,et al.  Adoption of cleaner technology for climate proactivity: a technology–firm–stakeholder framework , 2010 .

[12]  Ex-ante evaluation of EU ETS during 2013–2030: EU-internal abatement , 2015 .

[13]  M. Lemon,et al.  Critical success factors for embedding carbon management in organizations: lessons from the UK higher education sector , 2017 .

[14]  Su-Yol Lee,et al.  Corporate Carbon Strategies in Responding to Climate Change , 2012 .

[15]  Martin Müller,et al.  Drivers, Practices and Outcomes of Low-carbon Operations: Approaches of German Automotive Suppliers to Cutting Carbon Emissions , 2015 .

[16]  Sunhee Suk.  A survey on the impediments to low carbon technology investment of the petrochemical industry in Korea , 2016 .

[17]  A. Hoffman.  Climate Change Strategy: The Business Logic behind Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reductions , 2004 .

[18]  M. Toffel,et al.  Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box , 2008 .

[19]  M. Toffel,et al.  Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework , 2004 .

[20]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Modern Global Climate Change , 2003, Science.

[21]  Iain J. Clelland,et al.  Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment , 2004 .

[22]  Anita Engels,et al.  The European Emissions Trading Scheme: An exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon☆ , 2009 .

[23]  Thomas Trautmann,et al.  Regulatory Uncertainty: A Reason to Postpone Investments? Not Necessarily , 2009 .

[24]  Katherine L. Christ,et al.  Environmental management accounting: the significance of contingent variables for adoption , 2013 .

[25]  Andrew King,et al.  Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[26]  A. Verbeke,et al.  Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective , 2003 .

[27]  A. Kolk,et al.  Business Responses to Climate Change: Identifying Emergent Strategies , 2005 .

[28]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches to Forming Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models , 2000 .

[30]  Simon Cadez,et al.  Examining distinct carbon cost structures and climate change abatement strategies in CO2 polluting firms , 2017 .

[31]  Malte Schneider,et al.  The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System — Findings of company case studies in the German power sector , 2011 .

[32]  T. Busch,et al.  The Role of Short-Termism and Uncertainty Avoidance in Organizational Inaction on Climate Change , 2017 .

[33]  Simon Cadez,et al.  Climate change mitigation strategies in carbon-intensive firms , 2016 .

[34]  T. Virtanen,et al.  Energy Efficiency Complexities: A Technical and Managerial Investigation , 2013 .

[35]  O. Boiral,et al.  Modeling the Impacts of Corporate Commitment on Climate Change , 2012 .

[36]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations , 2013 .

[37]  Marc Journeault,et al.  Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance , 2010 .

[38]  Volker H. Hoffmann,et al.  Effects of regulatory uncertainty on corporate strategy—an analysis of firms’ responses to uncertainty about post-Kyoto policy , 2009 .

[39]  Florian Jaehn,et al.  The emissions trading paradox , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  O. Boiral,et al.  Strategies for Climate Change and Impression Management: A Case Study Among Canada’s Large Industrial Emitters , 2015 .

[41]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[42]  C. Fowler,et al.  Strategic Responses to Changing Climate Change Policies: The Role Played by Carbon Accounting , 2019 .

[43]  D. MacKenzie.  Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets , 2009 .

[44]  Yong Liu,et al.  Factors Influencing Consumer Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Products: A Simulation Study in China , 2017 .

[45]  M. Wakabayashi.  Voluntary business activities to mitigate climate change: Case studies in Japan , 2013 .

[46]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[47]  North American Business Strategies Towards Climate Change , 2007 .

[48]  T. Wang,et al.  Does the market value corporate response to climate change , 2013 .

[49]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Firm Competitiveness and the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme , 2012 .

[50]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Corporate environmentalism : the construct and its measurement , 2002 .

[51]  Arijit Paul,et al.  Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies , 2017 .

[52]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[53]  Volker H. Hoffmann,et al.  EU ETS and Investment Decisions:: The Case of the German Electricity Industry , 2007 .

[54]  Tasos Hovardas.  Two paradoxes with one stone: A critical reading of ecological modernization , 2016 .

[55]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: Formidable challenges ahead , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  F. Testa,et al.  Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness: An empirical study. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[57]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[58]  Richard York.  Asymmetric effects of economic growth and decline on CO 2 emissions , 2012 .

[59]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[60]  Timo Busch,et al.  Corporate Carbon Performance Indicators , 2008 .

[61]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[62]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance , 1999 .

[63]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  P. Letmathe,et al.  Eco-efficiency: GHG reduction related environmental and economic performance. The case of the companies participating in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme , 2017 .

[65]  Simon Cadez,et al.  Carbon Management Strategies in Manufacturing Companies: An Exploratory Note , 2010 .

[66]  N. Dolšak,et al.  Factors impacting investments in energy efficiency and clean technologies: empirical evidence from Slovenian manufacturing firms , 2016 .

[67]  Chukwumerije Okereke,et al.  An Exploration of Motivations, Drivers and Barriers to Carbon Management:: The UK FTSE 100 , 2007 .

[68]  Walter Wehrmeyer,et al.  How warm is the corporate responses to climate change? Evidence from Pakistan and the UK , 2008 .

[69]  T. Hahn,et al.  Value Drivers of Corporate Eco-Efficiency: Management Accounting Information for the Efficient Use of Environmental Resources , 2013 .

[70]  Olivier Boiral,et al.  Global Warming: Should Companies Adopt a Proactive Strategy? , 2006 .

[71]  Yong Liu,et al.  Research on the conflict between policymakers and firms in actioning low-carbon production , 2016 .

[72]  Jonathan Bundy,et al.  Strategic Cognition and Issue Salience: Toward an Explanation of Firm Responsiveness to Stakeholder Concerns , 2013 .

[73]  J. Harrison,et al.  STAKEHOLDERS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[74]  Cameron Hepburn,et al.  REGULATION BY PRICES, QUANTITIES, OR BOTH: A REVIEW OF INSTRUMENT , 2006 .

[75]  M. Abreu,et al.  Conceptual model for corporate climate change strategy development: Empirical evidence from the energy sector , 2017 .

[76]  T. Busch,et al.  Stakeholder engagement and environmental strategy – the case of climate change , 2010 .

[77]  Michael L. Barnett,et al.  Does it Pay to Be Really Good? Addressing the Shape of the Relationship between Social and Financial Performance , 2011 .

[78]  Chukwumerije Okereke,et al.  Regulatory Pressure and Competitive Dynamics: Carbon Management Strategies of UK Energy-Intensive Companies , 2010 .

[79]  Volker H. Hoffmann,et al.  Mitigating climate change – how do corporate strategies differ? , 2008 .

[80]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Constraining or Enabling Green Capability Development? How Policy Uncertainty Affects Organizational Responses to Flexible Environmental Regulations , 2017 .

[81]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[82]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change , 2010 .

[83]  P. Bansal,et al.  A Matter of Time: The Temporal Perspectives of Organizational Responses to Climate Change , 2012 .