Attentional Biases in Geometric form Perception

This paper reports the operation of robust attentional bias to the top and right during perception of small, single geometric forms. Same/different judgements of successively presented standard and comparison forms are faster when local differences are located at top and right rather than in other regions of the forms. The bias persists when form size is reduced to approximately one degree of visual angle, and it is unaffected by saccadic eye movements and by instructions to attend to other reliably differentiating regions of the forms. Results lend support in various degrees to two of the possible explanations of the bias: (1) a static, skewed distribution of attentional resources around eye fixation; and (2) biased, covert scanning that commences invariably at the top and right of stim ulus forms. Origins of the bias in terms of possible left-hemispheric capacity for constructing representations of visual stimuli from parts, as well as in terms of reading experience and prevailing optic flow during locomotion through space are considered. Recent investigations of conditions under which the bias can be maintained or reduced are mentioned.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[3]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  Perception of multiple objects - a connectionist approach , 1991, Neural network modeling and connectionism.

[4]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[5]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  D. Homa,et al.  Sensitization of the visual field. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Kinsbourne The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[8]  E. Yund,et al.  Serial processing of visual spatial patterns in a search paradigm , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  H. Carr An introduction to space perception , 1935 .

[10]  J. R. Kershner,et al.  Dual functional hemispheric asymmetry in visual perception: effects of ocular dominance and postexposural processes. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  E. W. Yund,et al.  Visual detectability gradients: Effect of illiteracy , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  L. Katz,et al.  Laterality and reading proficiency. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  E. Yund,et al.  Target detection in one visual field in the presence or absence of stimuli in the contralateral field by right-and left-handed subjects , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  Salvador Algarabel,et al.  A voice-activated key for the Apple Macintosh computer , 1989 .

[15]  F. Previc,et al.  Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  Tendencies to eye movement and perceptual accuracy. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Judith Avrahami Presence and Absence of Top and Right Advantage as an Indication of the Attentional Strategies Underlying Object Selection , 1998, Perception.

[18]  M. Annett Left, right, hand and brain : the right shift theory , 1985 .

[19]  M. Corballis Laterality and human evolution. , 1989, Psychological review.

[20]  S. Christman Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing , 1997 .

[21]  L. M. Ward Covert focussing of the attentionaL gaze. , 1985, Canadian journal of psychology.

[22]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[24]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Selective Attention in Vision , 1991 .

[25]  J. Rensbergen,et al.  Perception and cognition : advances in eye movement research , 1995 .

[26]  Diana Deutsch,et al.  Grouping Mechanisms in Music , 1999 .

[27]  G. Shulman,et al.  Gradients of spatial attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[28]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time , 1972 .

[29]  J. Palmer Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  F. Previc Attentional and Oculomotor Influences on Visual Field Anisotropies in Visual Search Performance , 1996 .

[31]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Properties, Parts, and Objects , 1986 .

[32]  S. Yantis On analog movements of visual attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  E. Yund,et al.  Guided Search: The Effects of Learning , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  David B. Boles,et al.  Voice recognition with the Apple-Psych system , 1988 .

[35]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[36]  E. Yund,et al.  Visual detectability gradients: Effect of high-speed visual experience , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  T. Stoffer,et al.  The time course of attentional zooming: A comparison of voluntary and involuntary allocation of attention to the levels of compound stimuli , 1993, Psychological research.

[38]  W. Beeman The Lopsided Ape: Evolution of the Generative Mind , 1994 .

[39]  F H Previc,et al.  Discriminability of random-dot stereograms in three-dimensional space. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[40]  S. Handel Auditory pattern recognition. , 2000 .

[41]  E. W. Yund,et al.  Spatial Nonuniformities in Visual Search , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[42]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of spatial location: Effects of selective attention , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  R. Efron The Decline and Fall of Hemispheric Specialization , 1990 .

[44]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[45]  C. Latimer,et al.  Eye-movement data: Cumulative fixation time and cluster analysis , 1988 .

[46]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[48]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability gradients as a function of target location , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[49]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[50]  J. Findlay,et al.  Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: Dependence of saccadic latency on target location , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Visual detectability gradients: The effect of distractors in contralateral field , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[52]  M. Corballis,et al.  The Psychology of Left and Right , 2020 .

[53]  H. F. Brandt Ocular patterns and their psychological implications. , 1940 .

[54]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of target location: Effects of spatial configuration , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[55]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  J. Stroop,et al.  Factors affecting speed in serial verbal reactions. , 1938 .

[57]  S. Geisser,et al.  An Extension of Box's Results on the Use of the $F$ Distribution in Multivariate Analysis , 1958 .

[58]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Differential Recognition of Tachistoscopically Presented English and Hebrew Words in Right and Left Visual Fields , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.