Responding to Technology-Enabled Organizational Transformation

As a result of the emergence of the Internet and net-enabled business processes, many industries have experienced a period of IT-enabled transformation in which organizations and business operations changed very rapidly. A natural question that arises is how can firms survive and even thrive during such transformations? In addressing this question, we show how a firm’s strategic change orientation—a meta-construct consisting of technological opportunism, market orientation, and entrepreneurial orientation—can influence the assimilation of IT and the resulting performance of business processes. We identify and examine two separate change enablers through which this influence occurs: (1) the development of IT capabilities; (2) the creation of a positive climate for IT use. These two change enablers influence the assimilation of technology within the organization and the resulting business process performance. We test the proposed model using a survey of 153 organizations in the retail auto industry, a compelling example of an industry that has undergone an IT-enabled transformation. Results explain 34% of the variance in process performance, and 34% of the variance in financial performance.

[1]  Susan S. White,et al.  Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: test of a causal model. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation , 2001 .

[4]  Christian Homburg,et al.  A Multiple-Layer Model of Market-Oriented Organizational Culture: Measurement Issues and Performance Outcomes , 2000 .

[5]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  e-Commerce Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations: Assessing the Value of e-Commerce to Firm Performance in the Manufacturing Sector , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[7]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[9]  Mark J. Safferstone Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology , 1998 .

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[11]  E. Prescott,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty , 1971 .

[12]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[13]  S. Barley The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[14]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[15]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[16]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[17]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[18]  Joseph O. Rentz,et al.  A conceptual and empirical comparison of three market orientation scales , 2005 .

[19]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[21]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[22]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[23]  Susan J. Winter,et al.  The Role of IT in the Transformation of Work: A Comparison of Post-Industrial, Industrial, and Proto-Industrial Organization , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..

[25]  M. Lessnoff Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[26]  Janet Fulk Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[27]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences , 1991, MIS Q..

[28]  G. Luffman,et al.  Determining the scope and impact of market orientation profiles on strategy implementation and performance , 2003 .

[29]  E. H. Bowman,et al.  Strategy through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental-Choice Process , 1993 .

[30]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[31]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[32]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[33]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[34]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[35]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Elizabeth M. Daniel,et al.  The role of dynamic capabilities in e-business transformation , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Reengineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions? , 1994, MIS Q..

[38]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[39]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  J. Guthrie High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[41]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[42]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Shaping UP for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimliation of Web Technologies , 2002, MIS Q..

[43]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[44]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Transformation of the IT Function at British Petroleum , 1997, MIS Q..

[45]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The information systems identity crisis , 2005 .

[46]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: FURTHER EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[47]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  S BharadwajAnandhi A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance , 2000 .

[49]  Moez Limayem,et al.  E-Mail and V-Mail Usage: Generalizing Across Technologies , 2000, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[50]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[51]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[53]  Ahmet H. Kirca,et al.  Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Impact on Performance , 2005 .

[54]  T. Wall,et al.  On the validity of subjective measures of company performance , 2004 .

[55]  L. Bollen,et al.  Investing in the IT That Makes a Competitive Difference , 2009 .

[56]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Bradley C. Wheeler,et al.  NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  G. Howard On Validity , 1981 .

[59]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  IT-Intensive Value Innovation in the Electronic Economy: Insights From Marshall Industries , 1999, MIS Q..

[60]  Martin Campbell-Kelly,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Change in the British Census, 1801-1911 , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[63]  F Meehan,et al.  Shaping the future. , 1991, Nursing.

[64]  Kenneth E. Aupperle Crossroads—Spontaneous Organizational Reconfiguration: A Historical Example Based on Xenophon's Anabasis , 1996 .

[65]  M. Markus,et al.  The Magic Bullet Theory in IT-Enabled Transformation , 1997 .

[66]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Research Commentary: Transformational Issues in Researching IS and Net-Enabled Organizations , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Information technology and the transformation of industries: three research perspectives , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[68]  KonanaPrabhudev,et al.  An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value , 2004 .

[69]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business , 2002 .

[70]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..