Advantages and limitations of formal expression

Testing the validity of knowledge requires formal expression of that knowledge. Formality of an expression is defined as the invariance, under changes of context, of the expression's meaning, i.e. the distinction which the expression represents. This encompasses both mathematical formalism and operational determination. The main advantages of formal expression are storability, universal communicability, and testability. They provide a selective edge in the Darwinian competition between ideas. However, formality can never be complete, as the context cannot be eliminated. Primitive terms, observation set-ups, and background conditions are inescapable parts of formal or operational definitions, that all refer to a context beyond the formal system. Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and Gödel's Theorem provide special cases of this more universal limitation principle. Context-dependent expressions, on the other hand, have the benefit of being more flexible, intuitive and direct, and putting less strain on memory. It is concluded that formality is not an absolute property, but a context-dependent one: different people will apply different amounts of formality in different situations or for different purposes. Some recent computational and empirical studies of formality and contexts illustrate the emerging scientific investigation of this dependence.

[1]  E. Gendlin Experiencing and the creation of meaning : a philosophical and psychological approach to the subjective , 1964 .

[2]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[3]  Eugene T. Gendlin,et al.  Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning. A Philosophical and Psychological Approach to the Subjective, coll. « Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy » , 1963 .

[4]  Alphonse G. Juilland,et al.  Frequency Dictionary of Italian Words , 1973 .

[5]  D. Véronique,et al.  Acquisition d'une Langue Etrangere: Perspectives et Recherches , 1988 .

[6]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Précis of The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Jean-Marc Dewaele,et al.  Formality of Language: definition, measurement and behavioral determinants , 1999 .

[8]  Carlo Tagliavini,et al.  Lessico di frequenza della lingua Italiana contemporanea , 1972 .

[9]  I. V. Ezhkova,et al.  Knowledge formation through context formalization , 1989 .

[10]  Jean-Marc Dewaele,et al.  How to measure formality of speech? A model of synchronic variation , 1996 .

[11]  Y. Bar-Hillel V.—INDEXICAL EXPRESSIONS , 1954 .

[12]  Jean-Marc Dewaele Extraversion et interlangue , 1994 .

[13]  Lars Löfgren,et al.  TOWARDS SYSTEM: FROM COMPUTATION TO THE PHENOMENON OF LANGUAGE , 1988 .

[14]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Objective, Subjective and Intersubjective Selectors of Knowledge , 1997 .

[15]  B. Barnes,et al.  Whatever should be done with indexical expressions? , 1976 .

[16]  Michael Barr,et al.  The Emperor's New Mind , 1989 .

[17]  S. Murray You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation , 1992 .

[18]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  What makes a meme successful , 1998 .

[19]  Richard Hudson,et al.  About 37% of word-tokens are nouns , 1994 .

[20]  Elan Moritz Memetic Science: I-General Introduction , 1990 .

[21]  S. Blackmore The Meme Machine , 1999 .

[22]  R. P. Kemble EXPERIENCING AND THE CREATION OF MEANING: A PHILOSOPHICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE SUBJECTIVE , 1963 .

[23]  Irina V. Ezhkova,et al.  A Contextual Approach for AI Systems Development , 1993, FLAI.

[24]  F. Heylighen The Growth of Structural and Functional Complexity during Evolution , 1999 .

[25]  Varol Akman,et al.  Steps Toward Formalizing Context , 1996, AI Mag..

[26]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Applications of Quantum Statistics in Psychological Studies of Decision Processes , 1995 .

[27]  Werkgroep Frequentie-onderzoek van het Nederlands,et al.  Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands , 1975 .

[28]  J. Lucas Minds, Machines and Gödel , 1961, Philosophy.

[29]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[30]  Lars Löfgren,et al.  Complementarity in language : toward a general understanding , 1992 .

[31]  A. Furnham Language and personality. , 1990 .

[32]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  from entailment meshes via semantic nets to learning webs , 2001 .

[33]  F. Heylighen Fitness as Default: the evolutionary basis of cognitive complexity reduction , 1994 .

[34]  John D Walecka APPLICATIONS OF QUANTUM STATISTICS , 2000 .

[35]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  The complete description of the frame problem , 1992 .

[36]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Design of a Hypermedia Interface Translating between Associative and Formal Representations , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[37]  Diederik Aerts The Hidden Measurement Formalism: What Can Be Explained and Where Quantum Paradoxes Remain , 1998 .

[38]  Jean‐Marc Dewaele The effect of gender on the choice of speech style , 1998 .

[39]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[40]  Jaroslav Ramík VAGUELY INTERRELATED COEFFICIENTS IN LP AS A BICRITERIAL OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM , 1991 .