Design of a box trainer for objective assessment of technical skills in single-port surgery.

OBJECTIVE Laparoscopic single-port (SP) surgery uses only a single entry point for all instruments. The approach of SP has been applied in multiple laparoscopic disciplines owing to its improved cosmetic result. However, in SP surgery, instrument movements are further restricted, resulting in increased instrument collisions compared with standard multiport (MP) laparoscopy. METHODS Our goal was to develop a trainer that can quantitatively measure task time, force and motion data during both MP and SP training to investigate the influence of instrument configuration on performance. Custom-made abdominal force sensors and accelerometers were integrated into a new training box that can be used in an SP and an MP configuration. This new box trainer measures forces, acceleration, and tilt angles during training of SP and MP laparoscopy. With the new trainer, 13 novices performed a tissue manipulation task to test whether significant differences exist between MP and SP in maximum abdominal force, maximum tissue manipulation force, maximum acceleration, and tilt angles of the handles. RESULTS The results show that the task time (SP-145s, standard deviation (SD) = 103 vs MP-61s SD = 16), maximum abdominal force (SP-8.4N, SD = 2.0 vs MP-left (L)-3.3N, SD = 0.8 and MP-right (R)-5.8N, SD = 2.1), tissue manipulation force (SP-10.4N, SD = 3.6 and MP-5.6N, SD = 1.3), maximum acceleration (MP-L-9m/s(2), SD = 5 vs SP-L-14m/s(2), SD = 7), and tilt angles of the left handle are significantly higher in SP. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION This study shows that the new trainer can be used to find the most important differences in instrument and tissue handling, which is an important step toward the assessment of surgical skills needed for safe SP surgery depending on force and motion-based parameters.

[1]  L. P. S. Stassen,et al.  Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice? , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Force Parameters for Skills Assessment in Laparoscopy , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[3]  Constantinos Loukas,et al.  An integrated approach to endoscopic instrument tracking for augmented reality applications in surgical simulation training , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[4]  James R Korndorffer,et al.  Do Metrics Matter? Time Versus Motion Tracking for Performance Assessment of Proficiency-Based Laparoscopic Skills Training , 2009, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[5]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Force measurement platform for training and assessment of laparoscopic skills , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  Marlies P Schijven,et al.  Implementation of simulation in surgical practice: Minimally invasive surgery has taken the lead: The Dutch experience , 2011, Medical teacher.

[7]  Erlend Fagertun Hofstad,et al.  Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  A comparison of skill acquisition and transfer in single incision and multi-port laparoscopic surgery. , 2013, Journal of surgical education.

[9]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Selman Uranues,et al.  Do hybrid simulator-generated metrics correlate with content-valid outcome measures? , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. , 2011, The Journal of surgical research.

[12]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Visual force feedback in laparoscopic training , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  R. N. Stiles,et al.  Mechanical factors in human tremor frequency. , 1967, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  Eric S. Hungness,et al.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  Gabriëlle J. M. Tuijthof,et al.  What Measures Represent Performance , 2015 .

[16]  Tamás Haidegger,et al.  [Laparoscopic skills training -- novel methods]. , 2013, Orvosi hetilap.

[17]  Jack Jakimowicz,et al.  Novice Surgeons Versus Experienced Surgeons in Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Surgery: A Comparison of Performances in a Surgical Simulator , 2012, World Journal of Surgery.

[18]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  The Influence of Instrument Configuration on Tissue Handling Force in Laparoscopy , 2013, Surgical innovation.

[19]  P. Rao,et al.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery - current status and controversies , 2011, Journal of minimal access surgery.

[20]  C. Bennett,et al.  The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1995 .

[21]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Visual force feedback improves knot-tying security. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[22]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[23]  Francis K. H. Quek,et al.  Hand Motion Gesture Frequency Properties and Multimodal Discourse Analysis , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[24]  I. Derweesh,et al.  Training for laparoendoscopic single‐site surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery , 2010, BJU international.