The clinical assessment of "Obscure Auditory Dysfunction" (OAD) 2. Case control analysis of determining factors.

Obscure Auditory Dysfunction (OAD) is defined as a clinical referral for self-reported auditory disability with no audiometric abnormality by stringent criteria. In stage 2 of a case control study of OAD, we have confirmed the general finding of stage 1 that OAD is multifactorial; compared with controls, patients as a group have a genuine performance deficit for understanding speech in noise, accompanied by personality-related factors. Paired logistic regression analysis optimally differentiated the 50 patients from their 50 matched controls on the basis of variables from three different domains: masked thresholds (psychoacoustic domain), dichotic listening ability (central/cognitive domain), and underestimation of own hearing ability (personality domain). A further and influential contributing variable was understanding of speech in noise supplementing the variables in both the psychoacoustic and the cognitive domains. With this model, 82.7% of the total group deviance was explained (i.e., the binary variable of case/control). A corresponding discriminant function analysis correctly classified 80% of patients and 90% of controls. When factors underlying the performance and personality-related variables were investigated with multiple linear regression within the two groups separately, relatively little of the within-group variance among OADs was explained. This is consistent with the multifactorial nature of OAD, in that the combinations of factors leading to OAD status differ between individuals. The research findings have been used to design a clinical test package to provide diagnostic information on the basis of OAD in individuals.

[1]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  G H Saunders,et al.  The clinical assessment of obscure auditory dysfunction--1. Auditory and psychological factors. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[3]  S Crown,et al.  A Short Clinical Diagnostic Self-rating Scale for Psychoneurotic Patients , 1966, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  R R Coles,et al.  Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure-tone threshold, age, sex and type of hearing loss. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[5]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J. R. Trinder,et al.  Hardware-software configuration for high performance digital filtering in real-time , 1982, ICASSP.

[7]  Dissociation Between Frequency Resolution and Hearing Threshold , 1983 .

[8]  S M Mason,et al.  Selective Dysacusis — A Preliminary Report , 1988, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[9]  William D. Marslen-Wilson Aspects of human speech understanding , 1986 .

[10]  J. L. Miller,et al.  A distinction between the effects of sentential speaking rate and semantic congruity on word identification , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. Clayton,et al.  Generalised Linear Models in Epidemiological Research: Case-Control Studies. , 1984 .

[13]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[14]  J. Katz,et al.  Handbook of clinical audiology , 1978 .

[15]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms , 1986, Hearing Research.

[16]  B. Ford International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps , 1984, Releve epidemiologique hebdomadaire.

[17]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[18]  A. Macleod,et al.  A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[19]  J M Festen,et al.  Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[20]  The effects of hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise by normal-hearing listeners. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  S. Gatehouse A pseudo free-field measure of auditory disability. , 1989, British journal of audiology.

[22]  A. Macleod,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.