The Development of Primary Care Information Technology in the United Kingdom

BackgroundUK primary care is highly computerized; initially led by enthusiastic general practitioners who developed their own systems. This preceded the development of a National Health Service information strategy and an ambitious National Programme for IT. ModelA 4-element model is proposed to explain the development of information technology: (1) individual clinician choice; (2) integration into the clinical task-–usually an office visit; (3) technological developments; and (4) organizational factors. ConclusionAll 4 elements of this model have been tilted in favor of the utilization of information technology; lessons from the United Kingdom may help other health systems looking to implement information technology systems in primary care.

[1]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Trends in the prevalence and management of diagnosed type 2 diabetes 1994–2001 in England and Wales , 2005, BMC family practice.

[2]  David W Bates.  The Road to Implementation of the Electronic Health Record , 2006, Proceedings.

[3]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Paperless practices: a report from a research network , 2002 .

[4]  C. Aydin,et al.  Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications , 1993 .

[5]  C. Weel,et al.  The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. , 2006, Family practice.

[6]  F. Sullivan,et al.  A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97 , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Tim Benson,et al.  Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not—Part 2: scalability , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Tim Benson,et al.  Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not—Part 1: incentives , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  S de Lusignan,et al.  Managers See the Problems Associated with Coding Clinical Data as a Technical Issue whilst Clinicians also See Cultural Barriers , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[10]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  The optimum granularity for coding diagnostic data in primary care: report of a workshop of the EF , 2006 .

[11]  J. van der Lei,et al.  Use and abuse of computer-stored medical records. , 1991 .

[12]  S. Brennan.  The NHS IT Project: The Biggest Computer Programme in the World... Ever! , 2005 .

[13]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: e-Prescribing, Efficiency, Quality: Lessons from the Computerization of UK Family Practice , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  Mike Fitter,et al.  The computer in the consulting room: a psychological framework , 1982 .

[15]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Routinely-collected general practice data are complex, but with systematic processing can be used for quality improvement and research. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[16]  D. Bates,et al.  Comprehensive computerised primary care records are an essential component of any national health information strategy: report from an international consensus conference. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[17]  A. Hannan,et al.  Towards a partnership of trust. , 2007, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  Azeem Majeed,et al.  Which general practices have higher list inflation? An exploratory study. , 2005, Family practice.

[19]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  UK and Croatia: family practice, its medical records and computerisation in the context of an enlarged Europe. , 2007, Informatics in primary care.

[20]  David Bates,et al.  Secondary uses of clinical data in primary care. , 2007, Informatics in primary care.

[21]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Breaking the first law of informatics: the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in the dock. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[22]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.