Impact of sulfur on three-way catalysts: Comparison of commercially produced Pd and Pt-Rh monoliths

Abstract Commercially-prepared Pt-Rh and Pd monolith catalysts were thermally aged then characterized for catalytic performance using a laboratory reactor to evaluate the magnitude and reversibility of the impact of sulfur on three-way activity. The SO 2 concentration in the feedstream was varied from 0 ppm to 30 ppm, which was comparable to sulfur levels in gasoline ranging from 0 to 450 ppm. Tests were first conducted using propylene and repeated using propane to represent the hydrocarbon mixture in exhaust. Of the two catalysts, Pd showed better propylene lightoff activity while Pt-Rh showed better propane lightoff activity, regardless of the sulfur content. For each catalyst, increasing the sulfur concentration from 0 ppm SO 2 to 30 ppm SO 2 of sulfur resulted in a lightoff temperature increase by 40 to 60°C. Under warmed-up conditions, the loss of activity for HC, CO and NOx due to the presence of sulfur was greater under slightly rich conditions than under lean conditions for both Pd and Pt-Rh, while the magnitude of the impact on NOx and particularly on HC activity under warmed-up stoichiometric conditions was significant and much greater for Pd than for Pt-Rh catalyst. Using propylene, the effect of SO 2 on the activity of the Pd catalyst was partly reversible, while the effect on Pt-Rh was completely reversible. Using propane, the effect of sulfur on the activity of both catalysts was larger than for propylene. The resulting decrease in activity due to the presence of sulfur was partly reversible on Pt-Rh, but the poisoning of the Pd catalyst was mostly irreversible. Part of the irreversible poisoning effect is attributed to a direct interaction or reaction between SO 2 and Pd, while the other part is attributed to the promotional effect of SO 2 in hydrocarbon coking of the catalyst when alkane hydrocarbons are present.

[1]  A. Datta,et al.  Claus catalysis. 1. Adsorption of sulfur dioxide on the alumina catalyst studied by FTIR and EPR spectroscopy , 1985 .

[2]  H. Wise,et al.  Deactivation and Poisoning of Catalysts , 1985 .

[3]  A. Crucq,et al.  Catalysis and Automotive Pollution Control , 1987 .

[4]  I. Lana,et al.  Infrared studies of the adsorption and surface reactions of hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide on some aluminas and zeolites , 1971 .

[5]  K. Taylor Sulfur Storage on Automotive Catalysts , 1976 .

[6]  D. D. Beck,et al.  The Effect of Sulfur on Three-Way Catalysts , 1991 .

[7]  R. Madix,et al.  SO2 structure and reactivity on clean and sulfur modified Pd(100) , 1988 .

[8]  Y. Yao The oxidation of hydrocarbons and CO over metal oxides: IV. Perovskite-type oxides , 1975 .

[9]  Jack C. Summers,et al.  The effects of SO2 on the performance of noble metal catalysts in automobile exhaust , 1979 .

[10]  J. Barbier,et al.  Effect of presulfurization on the formation of coke on supported metal catalysts , 1986 .

[11]  E. Wolf,et al.  Catalysts deactivation by coking , 1982 .

[12]  E. Bechtold,et al.  Adsorption of sulfur dioxide and the interaction of coadsorbed oxygen and sulfur on Pt(111) , 1982 .

[13]  D. D. Beck,et al.  Impact of sulfur on model palladium-only catalysts under simulated three-way operation , 1994 .

[14]  James C. Schlatter,et al.  Three-Way Catalyst Response to Transients , 1980 .

[15]  R. P. Burns,et al.  Chemisorption of sulfur dioxide on tungsten and platinum surfaces , 1981 .

[16]  M. S. Chattha,et al.  Composition of Pd-La/α-Al2O3 catalysts , 1992 .