Basics of seeing motion

Este capitulo e sobre as condicoes basicas no ver movimento (na maioria das vezes, de um unico objeto no plano frontoparalelo). Ele enfatiza a riqueza e o desafio do fenomeno da percepcao do movimento. Longe da distincao entre mecanismos aferente (retinal) e eferente (oculomotor), os perceptos de movimento podem resultar de movimento real (objeto) assim como de varias formas de movimento aparente (estroboscopico ou movimento phi, movimento induzido, autocinese). Outros fenomenos de movimento intrigantes incluem contraste de movimento e assimilacao, adaptacao e pos-efeitos de movimento, e transposicao de velocidades. Finalmente, desempenho antecipatorio da extrapolacao do movimento e considerado como um caso dinâmico da completacao perceptual amodal, indicando que o movimento visual esta estreitamente ligado a acao.

[1]  Werner Reichardt,et al.  Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  V. Bruce,et al.  Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology , 1985 .

[3]  A. Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Aftereffect of visual movement—the role of relative movement: A review , 1987 .

[4]  N. Wade,et al.  Visual motion aftereffects: Differential adaptation and test stimulation , 1998, Vision Research.

[5]  A. Sittig,et al.  Pointing in Three-Dimensional Space , 1996 .

[6]  J. Stevens,et al.  Oculoparalytic illusion: visual-field dependent spatial mislocalizations by humans partially paralyzed with curare. , 1982, Science.

[7]  N J Wade,et al.  A Selective History of the Study of Visual Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[8]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  A Neural Model of Smooth Pursuit Control and Motion Perception by Cortical Area MST , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  J Hohnsbein,et al.  Visual Localization and Estimation of Extent of Target Motion during Ocular Pursuit: A Common Mechanism? , 1990, Perception.

[10]  Joachim Hohnsbein,et al.  Motion Extrapolation Performance: A Linear Model Approach , 1993 .

[11]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual oscillations in form vision , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  John Palmer,et al.  Mechanisms of displacement discrimination with a visual reference , 1986, Vision Research.

[13]  M Niedeggen,et al.  Motion Aftereffects with Random-Dot Chequerboard Kinematograms: Relation between Psychophysical and VEP Measures , 1994, Perception.

[14]  A. Wertheim,et al.  Retinal and Extraretinal Information in Movement Perception: How to Invert the Filehne Illusion , 1987, Perception.

[15]  A. Michotte,et al.  Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives , 1964 .

[16]  Robert W. Massof,et al.  Nonlinear contribution of eye velocity to motion perception , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  L. Spillmann,et al.  From Neuron to Gestalt: Mechanisms of Visual Perception , 1996 .

[18]  R. Steinman,et al.  Phi is not beta, and why Wertheimer’s discovery launched the Gestalt revolution , 2000, Vision Research.

[19]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field , 1986, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Zanker,et al.  What determines the perceived speed of dots moving within apertures? , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Paola Bressan,et al.  A context-dependent illusion in the perception of velocity , 1991, Vision Research.

[22]  S. Petersen,et al.  Direction-specific adaptation in area MT of the owl monkey , 1985, Brain Research.

[23]  S. Zeki.  A vision of the brain , 1993 .

[24]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Movement adaptation in the peripheral retina , 1984, Vision Research.

[25]  Johannes Dichgans,et al.  Motion constancy dependent upon perceived distance and the spatial frequency of the stimulus pattern , 1976 .

[26]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Perception & control of self-motion , 1991 .

[27]  A. Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The adjacency principle and induced movement , 1972 .

[29]  M T Swanston,et al.  The Representation of Nonuniform Motion: Induced Movement , 1987, Perception.

[30]  C Y Li,et al.  Shift in speed selectivity of visual cortical neurons: a neural basis of perceived motion contrast. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  P. Dodwell,et al.  Experiments on the Afterimages of Stimulus Change (Dvořák 1870): A Translation with Commentary , 1994, Perception.

[32]  W H Ehrenstein,et al.  Motion Extrapolation and Velocity Transposition , 1997, Perception.

[33]  H W Leibowitz,et al.  Autokinetic drifts and gaze deviation , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  T. Radil,et al.  Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception , 1991, Vision Research.

[35]  Sheldon M. Ebenholtz,et al.  Oculomotor Systems and Perception , 2001 .

[36]  K. Nakayama,et al.  A Velocity Analogue of Brightness Contrast , 1973, Perception.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Alexander H. Wertheim,et al.  Motion perception during selfmotion: The direct versus inferential controversy revisited , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  J. Brown.  Über gesehene Geschwindigkeiten , 1928 .

[40]  J. Zanker,et al.  Motion vision : computational, neural, and ecological constraints , 2001 .

[41]  K. Koffka,et al.  Die Wahrnehmung von Bewegung , 1931 .

[42]  J. F. Brown.  The visual perception of velocity , 1931 .

[43]  Maninder K. Kahlon,et al.  Visual Motion Analysis for Pursuit Eye Movements in Area MT of Macaque Monkeys , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Extending reference signal theory to rapid movements , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  M T Swanston.  Frames of Reference and Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[46]  W H Ehrenstein,et al.  A Cross-Modal Aftereffect: Auditory Displacement following Adaptation to Visual Motion , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[47]  B Bridgeman,et al.  Sensory effects of eyepress are due to efference , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.