The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

This study tested the hypothesis that suppression contributes to the difference between simultaneous masking (SM) and forward masking (FM). To obtain an alternative estimate of suppression, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in the presence of a suppressor tone. Psychophysical-masking and DPOAE-suppression measurements were made in 22 normal-hearing subjects for a 4000-Hz signal/f(2) and two masker/suppressor frequencies: 2141 and 4281 Hz. Differences between SM and FM at the same masker level were used to provide a psychophysical estimate of suppression. The increase in L(2) to maintain a constant output (L(d)) provided a DPOAE estimate of suppression for a range of suppressor levels. The similarity of the psychophysical and DPOAE estimates for the two masker/suppressor frequencies suggests that the difference in amount of masking between SM and FM is at least partially due to suppression.

[1]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Galamboš.  INHIBITION OF ACTIVITY IN SINGLE AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS BY ACOUSTIC STIMULATION , 1944 .

[3]  L. Vogten,et al.  Low-level pure-tone masking: a comparison of "tuning curves" obtained with simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J. Guinan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  H. Hake,et al.  On the Masking Pattern of a Simple Auditory Stimulus , 1950 .

[7]  Stephen T Neely,et al.  Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Cochlear mechanics, nonlinearities, and cochlear potentials. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  X D Pang,et al.  Growth rate of simultaneous masking in cat auditory-nerve fibers: relationship to the growth of basilar-membrane motion and the origin of two-tone suppression. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. Smith.  Short-term adaptation in single auditory nerve fibers: some poststimulatory effects. , 1977 .

[11]  N Suga,et al.  Properties of ‘two‐tone inhibition’ in primary auditory neurones , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  M P Gorga,et al.  Suppression of auditory nerve responses. II. Suppression threshold and growth, iso-suppression contours. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  P J Abbas,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: extension of a stimulus-response relationship. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Evidence of upward spread of suppression in DPOAE measurements. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R L Smith,et al.  Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S. Neely,et al.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  D. Harris.  Action potential suppression, tuning curves and thresholds: Comparison with single fiber data , 1979, Hearing Research.

[20]  D. L. Neff,et al.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: Dependence on suppressor frequency and level , 1990, Hearing Research.

[23]  T. Houtgast.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  S P Bacon,et al.  Growth of simultaneous masking for fm < fs: effects of overall frequency and level. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  C. Abdala.  A developmental study of distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in humans , 1998, Hearing Research.

[26]  T. Janssen,et al.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  D. L. Weber.  Do off-frequency simultaneous maskers suppress the signal? , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  C. Abdala,et al.  Ipsilateral distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in children with sensorineural hearing loss. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  E M Relkin,et al.  Psychophysical and physiological forward masking studies: probe duration and rise-time effects. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  The Role of Suppression in the Upward Spread of Masking , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[31]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  H. Duifhuis,et al.  Level effects in psychophysical two-tone suppression. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R. Probst,et al.  Suppression of the 2f 1−f 2 otoacoustic emission in humans , 1992, Hearing Research.

[35]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Growth of masking as a measure of response growth in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Psychophysical suppression of selective portions of pulsation threshold patterns , 1986, Hearing Research.

[38]  R. L. Wegel,et al.  The Auditory Masking of One Pure Tone by Another and its Probable Relation to the Dynamics of the Inner Ear , 1924 .

[39]  David T. Kemp,et al.  Suppressibility of the 2 f 1- f 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man , 1984, Hearing Research.

[40]  C. Bray,et al.  The Interference of Tones in the Cochlea , 1940 .

[41]  W Jesteadt,et al.  The role of suppression in psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  I. J. Russell,et al.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear hair cells , 1979, Hearing Research.

[43]  Deep Sen,et al.  A unified theory of two‐tone suppression and upward‐spread of masking , 1998 .

[44]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Forward masking: adaptation or integration? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  P. Dallos,et al.  Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  C. Abdala,et al.  Maturation of cochlear nonlinearity as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in humans. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  B. Moore,et al.  Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  E. Javel,et al.  Suppression of auditory nerve responses I: temporal analysis, intensity effects and suppression contours. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Suppression and the upward spread of masking. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  D L Weber,et al.  Temporal factors and suppression effects in backward and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  R. Shannon.  Two-tone unmasking and suppression in a forward-masking situation. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.