Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family–Centered Non–Economic Goals in Small Firms

Using behavioral and stakeholder theories, we suggest that family firms may have family–centered non–economic goals and that these goals could influence firm behaviors. This study extends the literature by hypothesizing that the essence of family influence partially mediates the relationship between family involvement and family firms’ adoption of family–centered non–economic goals. The results using 1,060 small firms support the hypotheses. Aside from contributing to family business theory by explaining and testing mediating variables as sources of goal heterogeneity among family firms, our findings also imply that the involvement and essence approaches to defining family businesses may be hierarchically reconciled.

[1]  Matthew W. Rutherford,et al.  Advancing the Field of Family Business Research: Further Testing the Measurement Properties of the F-PEC , 2010 .

[2]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Family Business, Identity Conflict, and an Expedited Entrepreneurial Process: A Process of Resolving Identity Conflict , 2009 .

[3]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  An Agency Theoretic Analysis of the Professionalized Family Firm , 2009 .

[4]  Thomas Zellweger,et al.  On the Emotional Value of Owning a Firm , 2008 .

[5]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Toward a Theory of Familiness: A Social Capital Perspective , 2008 .

[6]  Matthew W. Rutherford,et al.  Examining the Link between “Familiness” and Performance: Can the F–PEC Untangle the Family Business Theory Jungle? , 2008 .

[7]  Laurie P. Milton,et al.  Unleashing the Relationship Power of Family Firms: Identity Confirmation as a Catalyst for Performance , 2008 .

[8]  James G. Combs Commentary: The Servant, the Parasite, and the Enigma: A Tale of Three Ownership Structures and Their Affiliate Directors 1 , 2008 .

[9]  Robert S. Nason,et al.  A Stakeholder Perspective on Family Firm Performance , 2008 .

[10]  Reginald A. Litz Two Sides of a One-Sided Phenomenon: Conceptualizing the Family Business and Business Family as a Möbius Strip , 2008 .

[11]  P. Jaskiewicz,et al.  Emotional Returns and Emotional Costs in Privately Held Family Businesses: Advancing Traditional Business Valuation , 2008 .

[12]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Are family firms really superior performers , 2007 .

[13]  Carole Howorth,et al.  ‘Types’ of private family firms: an exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis , 2007 .

[14]  Leif Melin,et al.  The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: the case of the family business , 2007 .

[15]  K. Eddleston,et al.  Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective ☆ , 2007 .

[16]  Kristina B. Dahlin,et al.  Aspiration Performance and Railroads' Patterns of Learning from Train Wrecks and Crashes , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Linda Argote,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm - 40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[18]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills , 2007 .

[19]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  *The Development of Organizational Social Capital: Attributes of Family Firms , 2007 .

[20]  W. Dyer Examining the 'Family Effect' on Firm Performance , 2006 .

[21]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500 , 2006 .

[22]  R. Barontini,et al.  The Effect of Family Control on Firm Value and Performance: Evidence from Continental Europe , 2006 .

[23]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  The influence of guided preparation on the long-term performance of new ventures , 2005 .

[24]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm , 2005 .

[25]  Sabine Klein,et al.  The F–PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, Validation, and Further Implication for Theory , 2005 .

[26]  M. Carney Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family–Controlled Firms , 2005 .

[27]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  The Effects of Parental Altruism on the Governance of Family-Managed Firms , 2005 .

[28]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  An Exploratory Comparison of the Behavioral Dynamics of Top Management Teams in Family and Nonfamily New Ventures: Cohesion, Conflict, Potency, and Consensus , 2005 .

[29]  P. Devereaux Jennings,et al.  Commentary on the Multidimensional Degree of Family Influence Construct and the F–PEC Measurement Instrument , 2005 .

[30]  Belen Villalonga,et al.  How Do Family Ownership, Control, and Management Affect Firm Value? , 2004 .

[31]  S. Zahra,et al.  Family Business Research: A Strategic Reflection , 2004 .

[32]  Reginald A. Litz,et al.  Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non–Family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence , 2004 .

[33]  Danny Miller,et al.  Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB Succession , 2004 .

[34]  C. Salvato,et al.  Self–Serving or Self–Actualizing? Models of Man and Agency Costs in Different Types of Family Firms: A Commentary on “Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non–family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence” , 2004 .

[35]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Are Family Firms Born or Made? An Exploratory Investigation , 2004 .

[36]  K. Eddleston,et al.  Feuding Families: When Conflict Does a Family Firm Good , 2004 .

[37]  Pramodita Sharma,et al.  An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future , 2004 .

[38]  C. Seow,et al.  Family Business , 2020, Political Godmother.

[39]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  I. MacMillan,et al.  A unified systems perspective of family firm performance , 2003 .

[41]  Reginald A. Litz,et al.  A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: an extension and integration , 2003 .

[42]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms , 2003 .

[43]  Ronald C. Anderson,et al.  Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 , 2003 .

[44]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms , 2003 .

[45]  W. Dyer,et al.  The Family: The Missing Variable in Organizational Research* , 2003 .

[46]  J. Grote Conflicting Generations: A New Theory of Family Business Rivalry , 2003 .

[47]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  The Determinants of Executive Compensation in Family-Controlled Public Corporations , 2003 .

[48]  R. Bhagat Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[49]  Francisco Pérez-Gónzalez,et al.  Inherited Control and Firm Performance , 2002 .

[50]  W. Crittenden,et al.  Founder centrality effects on the Mexican family firm’s top management group: firm culture, strategic vision and goals, and firm performance , 2002 .

[51]  Scott W. Geiger,et al.  A multidimensional examination of slack and its impact on innovation. , 2002 .

[52]  Kosmas X. Smyrnios,et al.  The F-PEC Scale of Family Influence: A Proposal for Solving the Family Business Definition Problem1 , 2002 .

[53]  Pramodita Sharma,et al.  Determinants of Initial Satisfaction with the Succession Process in Family Firms: A Conceptual Model , 2001 .

[54]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence , 2001 .

[55]  Randel S. Carlock,et al.  Strategic Planning for The Family Business: Parallel Planning to Unify the Family and Business , 2001 .

[56]  J. P. Near,et al.  Ceo Satisfaction and Firm Performance in Family Firms: Divergence between Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[57]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .

[58]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Defining the Family Business by Behavior , 1999 .

[59]  Harvey S. James,et al.  Owner as Manager, Extended Horizons and the Family Firm , 1999 .

[60]  Marc Cowling,et al.  Family Firm Research: The Need for a Methodological Rethink , 1998 .

[61]  Chandra S. Mishra,et al.  Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value , 1998 .

[62]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[63]  John A. Davis,et al.  Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business , 1997 .

[64]  Myung-Soo Lee,et al.  Research Note: Comparison of Small Businesses with Family Participation versus Small Businesses Without Family Participation: An Investigation of Differences in Goals, Attitudes, and Family/Business Conflict , 1996 .

[65]  J. Astrachan,et al.  Myths and Realities: Family Businesses' Contribution to the US Economy— A Framework for Assessing Family Business Statistics , 1996 .

[66]  Timothy R. Hinkin A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[67]  Reginald A. Litz THE FAMILY BUSINESS: TOWARD DEFINITIONAL CLARITY. , 1995 .

[68]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[69]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[70]  Bernard Barry,et al.  The Development of Organization Structure in the Family Firm , 1989 .

[71]  Neil C. Churchill,et al.  Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Businesses , 1987 .

[72]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[73]  W. Dyer,et al.  Cultural Change in Family Firms: Anticipating and Managing Business and Family Transitions , 1986 .

[74]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  R. Pollak A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households , 1985 .

[76]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[77]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[78]  E. Pedhazur Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .

[79]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[80]  A. Jacquemin,et al.  Familial Control, Size and Performance in the Largest French Firms , 1978 .

[81]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Strategy formulation : analytical concepts , 1978 .

[82]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[83]  L. Kanuk,et al.  Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review , 1975 .

[84]  Bernard Barry,et al.  The Development of Organisation Structure in the Family Firm , 1975 .

[85]  J. Laurenson Leadership in administration. , 1965, The New Zealand nursing journal. Kai tiaki.

[86]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[87]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .