University management perspective of quality: A review of Nigerian universities

The aim of this paper is to take a step back from the general debate surrounding the creation of a precise definition of quality in the context of university education. The paper investigates what principal officers in Nigeria universities perceived as quality from a rationale perspective rather than replicating the approach in a rationale environment. Rather, this paper investigates the reality as experienced by the principal officers who are involved in the day-to-day administration of their university. In view of this approach, a critical realist philosophy was adopted to help understand principal officers’ view of the debate. Thus, the study involved 29 principal officers in 6 universities. All the respondents had key roles in formulating, administering, and implementing issues relating to quality. The study findings reveal that many of the principal officers find it difficult to define quality though they assume they can recognise quality when they see it; however, observation of the 29 respondents who took part in the study revealed that these principal officers had a strong background in quantitative philosophy, thus giving them the assumption that quality must be measured and making it difficult to investigate or identify causal and missing mechanisms regarding the components of what to measure.

[1]  Dennis E. Clayson,et al.  Marketing Models in Education: Students as Customers, Products, or Partners , 2005 .

[2]  Patrick L. Townsend,et al.  Commit to quality , 1986 .

[3]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Multi‐models of quality in education , 1997 .

[4]  Lee Harvey,et al.  Fifteen Years of Quality in Higher Education , 2010 .

[5]  P. Materu.  Higher Education Quality Assurance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Status, Challenges, Opportunities, and Promising Practices , 2007 .

[6]  Jill Blackmore,et al.  Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: evaluating teaching and what students want , 2009 .

[7]  L. Lomas,et al.  Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education , 2003 .

[8]  K. Watty.  Quality Assurance in Education Emerald Article : Quality in accounting education : what say the academics ? , 2012 .

[10]  Mantz Yorke,et al.  Assuring quality and standards in globalised higher education , 1999 .

[11]  Hsiow-Ling Hsieh.  Shaping universities as learning organisations in Taiwan: a comparative study on comprehensive and technology universities , 2005 .

[12]  J. Salmi.  The challenge of establishing world-class universities , 2009 .

[13]  Trevor Hassall,et al.  Quality in higher education: from monitoring to management , 2003 .

[14]  L. Morley,et al.  Employers, quality and standards in higher education: Shared values and vocabularies or elitism and inequalities , 2007 .

[15]  John Beckford.  Quality: A Critical Introduction , 1998 .

[16]  Josep Gallifa,et al.  Student perceptions of service quality in a multi‐campus higher education system in Spain , 2010 .

[17]  G. Gibbs,et al.  Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning , 2005 .

[18]  A. Oni,et al.  Teacher Education and the Challenges of Global Economic Meltdown , 2014 .

[19]  Anthony Hesketh,et al.  Beyond Measuring the Human Resources Management-Organizational Performance Link: Applying Critical Realist Meta-Theory , 2006 .