Innovatory educational models for women returners in science, engineering and technology professions

Women returning to work after a break have been the target of programmes and initiatives within the adult and higher education sectors for many years: they have also been the focus of government concern at times of skills shortages. Often drawing on feminist principles and pedagogies , such initiatives have generally aimed to empower women and raise their awareness of gender issues at the same time as offering skills and training in preparation for employment (Coats 1996; Ellen and Herman 2005; Phipps 2008). The initiative discussed in this chapter has its roots in these traditions but, by using an online environment, the government has been able to offer a new programme to a wider and more diversely distributed target group, as well as focussing on the needs of a specific group: women already qualified in Science , Engineering or Technology (SET) subject areas.

[1]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Inventing Women Science, Technology and Gender , 1992 .

[2]  Ailsa Swarbrick To Encourage the Others: Women Studying Technology. , 1980 .

[3]  Paula Maurutto,et al.  Beyond Access: Considering Gender Deficits in Science Education. , 1998 .

[4]  J. Daniel Mega-universities and Knowledge Media , 1996 .

[5]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Young Women's Perceptions and Experiences of Becoming a Research Physicist , 2002 .

[6]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Redressing the balance: women into Science and Engineering , 1991 .

[7]  Ailsa Swarbrick Women in technology , 1981 .

[8]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Women in Technology. A Report to the Training Division of the Manpower Services Commission on the First Year of Option 1 for Women with No Technological Qualifications Who Wish to Enter Technology. , 1986 .

[9]  Chris Bissell,et al.  Still a gendered technology?: Issues in teaching ICT at the UK Open University , 2003 .

[10]  Nick Fames,et al.  Open University Community Education: emancipation or domestication? , 1988 .

[11]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Distance Education for European Women , 1997 .

[12]  T. Rees,et al.  Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Science in the European Union: The ‘ETAN Report’ , 2001 .

[13]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-tivities: the key to active online learning, 2nd ed. , 2002 .

[14]  Börje Holmberg,et al.  Distance Education: International Perspectives , 1988 .

[15]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Women in higher education: Issues and challenges for part-time scientists , 2005 .

[16]  Ailsa Swarbrick Women in Technology: a scheme for women engineer returners , 1986 .

[17]  Alison Phipps Book Review :Women in Science, Engineering and Technology: Three Decades of UK Initiatives , 2008 .

[18]  Mary Thorpe,et al.  Open learning for adults , 1987 .

[19]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  e-Learning or she-learning? Exploring students' gendered perceptions of education technology , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  Elizabeth Whitelegg,et al.  Girls in the physics classroom: a review of the research on the participation of girls in physics , 2006 .

[21]  Clem Herman,et al.  Women’s training revisited: developing new learning pathways for women IT technicians using a holistic approach , 2005 .

[22]  Flis Henwood,et al.  Technology and In/equality, Questioning the Information Society , 2001 .

[23]  Chris Bissell,et al.  Still a gendered technology? Issues in teaching information and communication technologies at the UK Open University , 2003 .

[24]  Patricia W. Lunneborg Ou Women: Undoing Educational Obstacles , 1997 .

[25]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Learners in transition: the use of ePortfolios for women returners to science, engineering and technology , 2008 .