Tree Automata, Mu-Calculus and Determinacy (Extended Abstract)

We show that the propositional Mu-Calculus is equivalent in expressive power to finite automataon infinite trees. Since complementation is trivial in the MuCalculus, our equivalence provides a radically simplified, alternative proof of Rabin’s complementation lemma for tree automata, which is the heart of one of the deepest decidability results. We also show how Mu-Calculus can be used to establish determinacy of infinite games used in earlier proofs of complementation lemma, and certain games used in the theory of on-line algorithms.

[1]  P. Wolfe The strict determinateness of certain infinite game , 1955 .

[2]  Y. Moschovakis Descriptive Set Theory , 1980 .

[3]  Robert S. Streett Propositional Dynamic Logic of looping and converse , 1981, STOC '81.

[4]  Yuri Gurevich,et al.  Trees, automata, and games , 1982, STOC '82.

[5]  Dexter Kozen,et al.  RESULTS ON THE PROPOSITIONAL’p-CALCULUS , 2001 .

[6]  J. Richard Büchi State-Strategies for Games in F G , 1983, J. Symb. Log..

[7]  Damian Niwinski On Fixed-Point Clones (Extended Abstract) , 1986, ICALP.

[8]  E. Muller David,et al.  Alternating automata on infinite trees , 1987 .

[9]  E. Allen Emerson,et al.  On simultaneously determinizing and complementing omega -automata , 1989, [1989] Proceedings. Fourth Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science.

[10]  Allan Borodin,et al.  On the power of randomization in online algorithms , 1990, STOC '90.

[11]  Wolfgang Thomas,et al.  Automata on Infinite Objects , 1991, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume B: Formal Models and Sematics.