CHARGED PARTICLE THERAPY STEPS INTO THE CLINICAL ENVIRONMENT

Beams of heavy charged particles like protons or carbon ions represent the ideal tool for the treatment of deep-seated, inoperable and radioresistant tumors. For more than 4 decades research with beams of charged particles has been performed. In total more than 40000 patients have been treated, mostly using protons being delivered by accelerators that were designed for basic research centers. In Berkeley, USA heavier particles like helium or neon ions were used to conduct clinical trials until 1992. Based on that somewhat limited technological standard and triggered by the promising results from Berkeley the first dedicated charged particle facilities were constructed. In order to maximally exploit the advantageous physical and radiobiological characteristics of these beams enormous effort was put into developing dynamic beam delivery techniques and tailoring the capabilities of the accelerators, the planning systems and the quality assurance procedures and equipment to the requirements resulting from these new treatment modalities. Active beam delivery systems integrated in rotating gantries, if necessary, will allow the production of superior dose distributions that precisely follow the medical prescription. The technological progress being made during the last 10 years defines the state of the art of the upcoming next-generation facilities for the clinical environment in Europe and Japan.

[1]  O Jäkel,et al.  The Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  Results of carbon ion radiotherapy in 152 patients. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  O Jäkel,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  M Scholz,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: calculation and optimization of biologically effective dose. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  O Jäkel,et al.  Selection of beam angles for radiotherapy of skull base tumours using charged particles. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  Positron emission tomography for quality assurance of cancer therapy with light ion beams , 1999 .

[7]  J. Debus,et al.  The GSI Cancer Therapy Project , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167).

[8]  M. Scholz,et al.  Calculation of Heavy Ion Inactivation Probabilities Based on Track Structure, X Ray Sensitivity and Target Size , 1994 .

[9]  D. Schardt,et al.  Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy , 1993 .

[10]  B. A. Ludewigt,et al.  Instrumentation for Treatment of Cancer Using Proton and Light-Ion Beams , 1993 .

[11]  R. Wilson Radiological use of fast protons. , 1946, Radiology.

[12]  T. Tomitani,et al.  SPOT SCANNING SYSTEM WITH RI BEAM AT HIMAC , 2000 .

[13]  Thomas Haberer,et al.  GANTRY STUDIES FOR THE PROPOSED HEAVY ION CANCER THERAPY FACILITY IN HEIDELBERG , 2000 .

[14]  E. Pedroni LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN PROTON THERAPY , 2000 .

[15]  K. Prelec IONS AND ION ACCELERATORS FOR CANCER TREATMENT , 1997 .

[16]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization. , 1995, Medical physics.

[17]  G Kraft,et al.  The radiobiological and physical basis for radiotherapy with protons and heavier ions. , 1990, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[18]  C A Tobias,et al.  Particle radiography and autoactivation. , 1977, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.