Decision tools for earthquake risk management, including Net Present Value and Expected Utility

The results of earthquake risk assessments should be presented in ways that will help facilitate risk management decisions. So the measures of risk that are chosen need to be those that will assist decision-makers. Annualised Loss may not be the best basis on which risk management decisions can be made. The Conditional Expected Value of the loss, defined for a suitable set of probability ranges, is a promising measure of the risk because it is similar to a scenario loss and can be readily comprehended by decision-makers. Utility Theory provides a further measure by taking account of individuals' perceptions of the severity of losses. It can be combined with the concept of Net Present Value to give an overall measure of the risk in terms of the value judgements of the individual decision-maker. The reduction in risk that would result from proposed mitigation works can be readily assessed, so that the decision-maker who is faced with the costs of mitigation is in a position to assess the benefits.

[1]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[2]  James F. Davis,et al.  The calculation of expected loss using probabilistic seismic hazard , 1999 .

[3]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Risk modeling, assessment, and management , 1998 .

[4]  Warwick Smith Criteria for strengthening buildings: Cost-benefit analysis is misleading , 2003 .

[5]  James L. Beck,et al.  Simplified PBEE to Estimate Economic Seismic Risk for Buildings , 2004 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Psychology of Preferences , 1982 .

[7]  Warwick D. Smith Earthquake Hazard and Risk Assessment in New Zealand by Monte Carlo Methods , 2003 .

[8]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Student,et al.  PSYCHOLOGY OF PREFERENCES , 1982, Pediatrics.

[10]  Kelvin Berryman,et al.  A New Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand , 2002 .

[11]  Mark D. Petersen,et al.  Losses to Single-Family Housing from Ground Motions in the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake , 2004 .

[12]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Siting energy facilities , 1980 .

[13]  Eric R. Zieyel Operations research : applications and algorithms , 1988 .

[14]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[16]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .