Text exposure predicts spoken production of complex sentences in 8- and 12-year-old children and adults.

There is still much debate about the nature of the experiential and maturational changes that take place during childhood to bring about the sophisticated language abilities of an adult. The present study investigated text exposure as a possible source of linguistic experience that plays a role in the development of adult-like language abilities. Corpus analyses of object and passive relative clauses (Object: The book that the woman carried; Passive: The book that was carried by the woman) established the frequencies of these sentence types in child-directed speech and children's literature. We found that relative clauses of either type were more frequent in the written corpus, and that the ratio of passive to object relatives was much higher in the written corpus as well. This analysis suggests that passive relative clauses are much more frequent in a child's linguistic environment if they have high rates of text exposure. We then elicited object and passive relative clauses using a picture-description production task with 8- and 12-year-old children and adults. Both group and individual differences were consistent with the corpus analyses, such that older individuals and individuals with more text exposure produced more passive relative clauses. These findings suggest that the qualitatively different patterns of text versus speech may be an important source of linguistic experience for the development of adult-like language behavior.

[1]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[2]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[3]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Franklin Chang,et al.  A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses , 2011 .

[5]  H. Goodluck,et al.  Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses , 1982, Cognition.

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  The Theoretical Basis For Relationships Between Language and Literacy in Development , 1991 .

[8]  E. Kaan Effects of NP Type on the Resolution of Word-Order Ambiguities , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[9]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[10]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Tracking the Unique Effects of Print Exposure in Children: Associations with Vocabulary, General Knowledge, and Spelling. , 1991 .

[11]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[12]  Elena Lieven,et al.  Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency , 2010 .

[13]  E. Dąbrowska,et al.  More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? , 2010 .

[14]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing , 2002 .

[15]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[16]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Is working memory training effective? , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  D. P. Hayes Speaking and writing: Distinct patterns of word choice , 1988 .

[18]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[19]  Marianne Hundt,et al.  What corpora tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions , 2001 .

[20]  M. Tomasello,et al.  A New Look at the Acquisition of Relative Clauses , 2005 .

[21]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[22]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[23]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Discourse Expectations and Relative Clause Processing. , 2012 .

[24]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[26]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  The use of uh and um by 3- and 4-year-old native English-speaking children: Not quite right but not completely wrong , 2008 .

[27]  A. Sheldon The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English , 1973 .

[28]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Language Learning , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Michael McCarthy,et al.  The English get-passive in spoken discourse: description and implications for an interpersonal grammar , 1999, English Language and Linguistics.

[31]  D. Tannen,et al.  The Relation Between Written and Spoken Language , 1987 .

[32]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  The acquisition of word meaning: An investigation into some current conflicts , 1978 .

[33]  J. M. Anglin,et al.  Overextension and underextension in the child's expressive and receptive speech , 1982, Journal of Child Language.

[34]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.

[35]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Syntactic priming in young children , 2004 .

[36]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[37]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[38]  Kenneth Aizawa,et al.  Jeffrey L. Elman, Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi, and Kim Plunkett, (eds.), Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development, Neural Network Modeling and Connectionism Series and Kim Plunkett and Jeffrey L. Elman, Exercises in Rethinkin , 1999, Minds and Machines.

[39]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Exposure to print and orthographic processing. , 1989 .

[40]  Johan Elsness That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English 1 , 1984 .

[41]  Barry K. Rosen,et al.  Syntactic Complexity , 1974, Inf. Control..

[42]  F. Niyi Akinnaso,et al.  On The Differences Between Spoken and Written Language , 1982 .

[43]  F. Ferreira,et al.  Patient-related constraints on get- and be-passive uses in English: evidence from paraphrasing , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[44]  G. Dell,et al.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production , 2007, Cognition.

[45]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.

[46]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  Visual Salience Modulates Structure Choice in Relative Clause Production , 2014, Language and speech.

[47]  K. Stanovich,et al.  What Reading Does for the Mind. , 1998 .

[48]  Ewa Dąbrowska,et al.  Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment , 2012 .

[49]  Tomasello,et al.  The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech , 2001 .

[50]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[51]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses , 2012, Journal of memory and language.

[52]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses , 2005 .

[53]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses , 2007 .

[54]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Language input and child syntax , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  A construction based analysis of child directed speech , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[56]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[57]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Connectionism and language acquisition. , 2001 .

[58]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[59]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  Learning Words from Context , 2008 .

[60]  Daniel J. Acheson,et al.  New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[61]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). , 2002, Psychological review.

[62]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[63]  C. Snow Literacy and Language: Relationships during the Preschool Years , 1983 .

[64]  R. Jackendoff Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[65]  S. Waxman,et al.  What infants know about syntax but couldn't have learned: experimental evidence for syntactic structure at 18 months , 2003, Cognition.

[66]  T. Cameron-Faulkner,et al.  A comparison of book text and Child Directed Speech , 2013 .

[67]  S. Krashen We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis , 1989 .

[68]  G. Storms,et al.  Object Naming and Later Lexical Development: From Baby Bottle to Beer Bottle. , 2008 .

[69]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[70]  E. Clark Strategies for Communicating. , 1978 .

[71]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[72]  G. Yeni-Komshian,et al.  Age Constraints on Second-Language Acquisition , 1999 .

[73]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Experience and generalization in a connectionist model of Mandarin Chinese relative clause processing , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[74]  M. Fluck,et al.  Comprehension of Relative Clauses By Children Aged Five To Nine Years , 1978, Language and speech.

[75]  K. Hakuta,et al.  Children's comprehension of relative clauses , 1979, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[76]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[77]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: a five-year longitudinal study. , 2002, Child development.

[78]  Susannah Kirby,et al.  A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences , 2012 .

[79]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[80]  Peter Collins,et al.  Get‐passives in English , 1996 .

[81]  F P Roth,et al.  Accelerating language learning in young children , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[82]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[83]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  How language production shapes language form and comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychol..

[84]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. , 1992 .

[85]  D. Hakes,et al.  Sentence comprehension and relative pronouns , 1970 .

[86]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses , 2010, Cognition.

[87]  J. Devito Psychogrammatical factors in oral and written discourse by skilled communicators , 1966 .

[88]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[89]  L. Rescorla,et al.  Overextension in early language development , 1980, Journal of Child Language.

[90]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[91]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[92]  David Temperley,et al.  Ambiguity Avoidance in English Relative Clauses , 2003 .

[93]  Iman Sharif,et al.  Exposure to Reach Out and Read and vocabulary outcomes in inner city preschoolers. , 2002, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[94]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .

[95]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[96]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity , 2002, Cognition.

[97]  Luk Pui Ki Children's Comprehension of Relative Clauses , 2007 .

[98]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence , 2007 .

[99]  H. Shu,et al.  Word learning does not end at fast-mapping: Evolution of verb meanings through reorganization of an entire semantic domain , 2011, Cognition.

[100]  A. Ninio Joint Book Reading as a Multiple Vocabulary Acquisition Device , 1983 .

[101]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[102]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush , 2006 .

[103]  Stephen R. Zubrick,et al.  Early vocabulary development: The importance of joint attention and parent-child book reading , 2012 .

[104]  R. Baayen,et al.  Learning is not decline: The mental lexicon as a window into cognition across the lifespan , 2014 .

[105]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[106]  Holly Branigan,et al.  Syntactic Priming , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[107]  D. P. Hayes,et al.  Vocabulary simplification for children: a special case of ‘motherese’? , 1988, Journal of Child Language.

[108]  Amy Sheldon On strategies for processing relative clauses: A comparison of children and adults , 1977 .

[109]  J. Marks Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 2001 .

[110]  D. Biber,et al.  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 1999 .

[111]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Discourse structure and relative clause processing , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[112]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[113]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The use of "that" in the Production and Comprehension of Object Relative Clauses , 2003 .

[114]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Syntactic Complexity Effects in Sentence Production , 2015, Cogn. Sci..