Sense and Sensibility in a Pervasive World

The increasing popularity of location based social services such as Facebook Places, Foursquare and Google Latitude, solicits a new trend in fusing social networking with real-world sensing. The availability of a wide range of sensing technologies in our everyday environment presents an opportunity to further enrich social networking systems with fine-grained real-world sensing. However, the introduction of passive sensing into a social networking application disrupts the traditional, user-initiated input to social services, raising both privacy and acceptability concerns. In this work we present an empirical study of the introduction of a sensor-driven social sharing application within the working environment of a research institution. Our study is based on a real deployment of a system that involves location tracking, conversation monitoring, and interaction with physical objects. By utilizing surveys, interviews and experience sampling techniques, we report on our findings regarding privacy and user experience issues, and significant factors that can affect acceptability of such services by the users. Our results suggest that such systems deliver significant value in the form of self reflection and comparison with others, while privacy concerns are raised primarily by the limited control over the way individuals are projected to their peers.

[1]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Sensible Organizations: Technology and Methodology for Automatically Measuring Organizational Behavior , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[2]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  EmotionSense: a mobile phones based adaptive platform for experimental social psychology research , 2010, UbiComp.

[3]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[4]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Who wants to know what when? privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media , 2007, CHI.

[6]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Mining Face-to-Face Interaction Networks using Sociometric Badges: Predicting Productivity in an IT Configuration Task , 2008, ICIS.

[7]  I. Altman Privacy Regulation: Culturally Universal or Culturally Specific? , 1977 .

[8]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  In the best families: tracking and relationships , 2011, CHI.

[9]  John Zimmerman,et al.  I'm the mayor of my house: examining why people use foursquare - a social-driven location sharing application , 2011, CHI.

[10]  John A. Stankovic,et al.  ALARM-NET: Wireless Sensor Networks for Assisted-Living and Residential Monitoring , 2006 .

[11]  Wei Pan,et al.  SoundSense: scalable sound sensing for people-centric applications on mobile phones , 2009, MobiSys '09.

[12]  R.N. Murty,et al.  CitySense: An Urban-Scale Wireless Sensor Network and Testbed , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security.

[13]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The active badge location system , 1992, TOIS.

[14]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world , 2003, CHI '03.

[15]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Motivations to participate in online communities , 2010, CHI.

[16]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  Rethinking location sharing: exploring the implications of social-driven vs. purpose-driven location sharing , 2010, UbiComp.

[17]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Sensing meets mobile social networks: the design, implementation and evaluation of the CenceMe application , 2008, SenSys '08.

[18]  G. Sewell The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. , 1998 .

[19]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Smart objects as building blocks for the Internet of things , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.