Quasiequilibrium approximation of fast reaction kinetics in stochastic biochemical systems.

We address the problem of eliminating fast reaction kinetics in stochastic biochemical systems by employing a quasiequilibrium approximation. We build on two previous methodologies developed by [Haseltine and Rawlings, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 6959 (2002)] and by [Rao and Arkin, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4999 (2003)]. By following Haseltine and Rawlings, we use the numbers of occurrences of the underlying reactions to characterize the state of a biochemical system. We consider systems that can be effectively partitioned into two distinct subsystems, one that comprises "slow" reactions and one that comprises "fast" reactions. We show that when the probabilities of occurrence of the slow reactions depend at most linearly on the states of the fast reactions, we can effectively eliminate the fast reactions by modifying the probabilities of occurrence of the slow reactions. This modification requires computation of the mean states of the fast reactions, conditioned on the states of the slow reactions. By assuming that within consecutive occurrences of slow reactions, the fast reactions rapidly reach equilibrium, we show that the conditional state means of the fast reactions satisfy a system of at most quadratic equations, subject to linear inequality constraints. We present three examples which allow analytical calculations that clearly illustrate the mathematical steps underlying the proposed approximation and demonstrate the accuracy and effectiveness of our method.

[1]  Samuel Karlin,et al.  A First Course on Stochastic Processes , 1968 .

[2]  M. Savageau Biochemical Systems Analysis: A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology , 1976 .

[3]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[4]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[5]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. A. Shea,et al.  The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[8]  H. Lodish Molecular Cell Biology , 1986 .

[9]  D. Gillespie A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation , 1992 .

[10]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[11]  R. Heinrich,et al.  The Regulation of Cellular Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[12]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[13]  A. Arkin,et al.  It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[14]  D. Gillespie The chemical Langevin equation , 2000 .

[15]  Michael A. Gibson,et al.  Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels , 2000 .

[16]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Coupled energetics of lambda cro repressor self-assembly and site-specific DNA operator binding II: cooperative interactions of cro dimers. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  J. Hasty,et al.  Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing , 2001 .

[19]  D. Gillespie Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems , 2001 .

[20]  J. Rawlings,et al.  Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic chemical kinetics , 2002 .

[21]  L. You,et al.  Stochastic vs. deterministic modeling of intracellular viral kinetics. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[23]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Improved leap-size selection for accelerated stochastic simulation , 2003 .

[24]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Prediction and measurement of an autoregulatory genetic module , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  Stiffness in stochastic chemically reacting systems: The implicit tau-leaping method , 2003 .

[26]  C. Rao,et al.  Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: Application to the Gillespie algorithm , 2003 .

[27]  R. Bundschuh,et al.  Fluctuations and slow variables in genetic networks. , 2003, Biophysical Journal.

[28]  K. Burrage,et al.  Binomial leap methods for simulating stochastic chemical kinetics. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  Hong Li,et al.  Efficient formulation of the stochastic simulation algorithm for chemically reacting systems. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[30]  Michael C. Mackey,et al.  Why the Lysogenic State of Phage λ Is So Stable: A Mathematical Modeling Approach , 2004 .

[31]  Tianhai Tian,et al.  A multi-scaled approach for simulating chemical reaction systems. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[32]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  A Genetic Switch, Phage Lambda Revisited , 2004 .

[33]  J Hasty,et al.  Cellular growth and division in the Gillespie algorithm. , 2004, Systems biology.

[34]  D. Vlachos,et al.  Binomial distribution based tau-leap accelerated stochastic simulation. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  Linda R Petzold,et al.  The slow-scale stochastic simulation algorithm. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[36]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.