Meta-analytical assessment of the effects of protocol variations on cortisol responses to the Trier Social Stress Test

BACKGROUND The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) is one of the most widely used laboratory stress tests. Exposure to this psychosocial stressor has been shown to stimulate an acute cortisol stress response in the majority of healthy individuals, while deviations from the typical pattern, i.e., cortisol reactivity dysfunctions have been linked to an ever-increasing number of negative health outcomes. However, significant variability between labs exists in strength of observed cortisol responses in healthy individuals. This variability raises the question of how to distinguish across labs between cortisol stress response patterns that reflect health risk from those that are due to methodological differences. Thus, we propose a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims at quantifying the effects of methodological variation in study and TSST protocol elements on cortisol stress responses in healthy individuals. METHODS Literature searches were conducted using standard databases for English language with key words including Trier Social Stress Test, TSST, Cortisol, and Laboratory Stressor among others. 186 studies met our inclusion criteria of healthy human participants without systemic immunological or endocrine dysfunction and provided sufficient information to compute a total of 237 sub-sample effect sizes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION With regard to study protocol variations that may risk confounding baseline cortisol values and thus influence subsequent reactivity measures, meta-analytical examination revealed that acclimation periods pre-TSST below 30 or perhaps even 15min may suffice, at least as long as no interfering activities, i.e., questionnaires, are taking place during that timeframe. Assessing the effects of TSST protocol variations on cortisol response strength, several observations are noteworthy. First, shortening speech preparation time did not change cortisol responses in any way, nor did including questionnaires during that period show an effect. As such, our findings suggest that speech preparation time is one TSST element that can be used to reduce the burden for participants as well as laboratory logistics. Secondly, having an all female panel and instructing panel members to show negative instead of neutral behavior towards the participants both were associated with considerably reduced cortisol stress response strengths. Thirdly, several variables of interest, such as content of the speech task or gender match between active panel member and participant, were problematic to evaluate due to the large number of studies not reporting those details. This calls for future studies to report more details regarding potentially relevant protocol specifications.

[1]  S. Davis,et al.  Prevention of an increase in plasma cortisol during hypoglycemia preserves subsequent counterregulatory responses. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  M. Kemeny.  The Psychobiology of Stress , 2003 .

[3]  B. Kudielka,et al.  Effort-reward-imbalance and overcommitment are associated with hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis responses to acute psychosocial stress in healthy working schoolteachers , 2008, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[4]  S. Dickerson,et al.  Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  R. Lazarus.  Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. , 1993, Psychosomatic medicine.

[6]  J W Mason,et al.  A historical view of the stress field. , 1975, Journal of human stress.

[7]  Jens C. Pruessner,et al.  Differentiating anticipatory from reactive cortisol responses to psychosocial stress , 2013, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[8]  B. Kudielka,et al.  Ten Years of Research with the Trier Social Stress Test--Revisited. , 2007 .

[9]  L. Abramson,et al.  Processing of ambiguous and unambiguous feedback by depressed and nondepressed college students: schematic biases and their implications for depressive realism. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  S. Dickerson,et al.  When the social self is threatened: shame, physiology, and health. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[11]  P Evans,et al.  The Awakening Cortisol Response: Methodological Issues and Significance , 2004, Stress.

[12]  R. Rose,et al.  Plasma cortisol and growth hormone responses to intravenous characterization. , 1975, Journal of human stress.

[13]  Marian Joëls,et al.  Implications of psychosocial stress on memory formation in a typical male versus female student sample , 2011, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[14]  Marian Joëls,et al.  Stress and cognition: are corticosteroids good or bad guys? , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  C. Kirschbaum,et al.  Salivary alpha-amylase stress reactivity across different age groups. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Beat Meier,et al.  Stress Effects on Working Memory, Explicit Memory, and Implicit Memory for Neutral and Emotional Stimuli in Healthy Men , 2008, Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  C. Kirschbaum,et al.  The 'Trier Social Stress Test'--a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. , 1993, Neuropsychobiology.

[18]  Brigitte M. Kudielka,et al.  Delayed response and lack of habituation in plasma interleukin-6 to acute mental stress in men , 2006, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

[19]  Nicolas Rohleder,et al.  Chronic Interpersonal Stress Predicts Activation of Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Signaling Pathways 6 Months Later , 2009, Psychosomatic medicine.

[20]  R. Sapolsky,et al.  How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.

[21]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  T. Dinan,et al.  Biological and psychological markers of stress in humans: Focus on the Trier Social Stress Test , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[23]  Ulrike Ehlert,et al.  Acute psychosocial stress: Does the emotional stress response correspond with physiological responses? , 2012, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[24]  Marian Joëls,et al.  Learning under stress: how does it work? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  C. Kirschbaum,et al.  Neuroendocrine and psychometric evaluation of a placebo version of the ‘Trier Social Stress Test’ , 2009, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[26]  W. Swann,et al.  Allure of negative feedback: self-verification strivings among depressed persons. , 1992, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  B. Major,et al.  From “In the Air” to “Under the Skin”: Cortisol Responses to Social Identity Threat , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[28]  Raymond Niaura,et al.  Stress response and the adolescent transition: Performance versus peer rejection stressors , 2009, Development and Psychopathology.

[29]  Oliver T. Wolf,et al.  Cortisol broadens memory of a non-stressful social interaction , 2015, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  J Licinio,et al.  Cardiovascular and neuroendocrine adjustment to public speaking and mental arithmetic stressors. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  Social-Evaluative Threat and Proinflammatory Cytokine Regulation , 2009, Psychological science.

[32]  M. Duff,et al.  Acute stress reduces speech fluency , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[33]  C. Kirschbaum,et al.  Human hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis responses to acute psychosocial stress in laboratory settings , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[34]  S. Brand,et al.  Both Hair Cortisol Levels and Perceived Stress Predict Increased Symptoms of Depression: An Exploratory Study in Young Adults , 2013, Neuropsychobiology.

[35]  George P. Chrousos,et al.  Mechanisms of stress: A dynamic overview of hormonal and behavioral homeostasis , 1992, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  G. Cumming.  Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .