Interactions between N- and C-terminal domains of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high-mobility group protein HMO1 are required for DNA bending.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae high-mobility group protein HMO1 is composed of two DNA-binding domains termed box A and box B, of which only box B is predicted to adopt a HMG fold, and a lysine-rich C-terminal extension. To assess the interaction between individual domains and their contribution to DNA binding, several HMO1 variants were analyzed. Using circular dichroism spectroscopy, thermal stability was measured. While the melting temperatures of HMO1-boxA and HMO1-boxB are 57.2 and 47.2 degrees C, respectively, HMO1-boxBC, containing box B and the entire C-terminal tail, melts at 46.1 degrees C, suggesting little interaction between box B and the tail. In contrast, full-length HMO1 exhibits a single melting transition at 47.9 degrees C, indicating that interaction between box A and either box B or the tail destabilizes this domain. As HMO1-boxAB, lacking only the lysine-rich C-terminal segment, exhibits two melting transitions at 46.0 and 63.3 degrees C, we conclude that the destabilization of the box A domain seen in full-length HMO1 is due primarily to its interaction with the lysine-rich tail. Determination of DNA substrate specificity using electrophoretic mobility shift assays shows unexpectedly that the lysine-rich tail does not increase DNA binding affinity but instead is required for DNA bending by full-length HMO1; HMO1-boxBC, lacking the box A domain, also fails to bend DNA. In contrast, both HMO1 and HMO1-boxAB, but not the individual HMG domains, exhibit preferred binding to constrained DNA minicircles. Taken together, our data suggest that interactions between box A and the C-terminal tail induce a conformation that is required for DNA bending.

[1]  S. Knapp,et al.  The long acidic tail of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein forms an extended and flexible structure that interacts with specific residues within and between the HMG boxes. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[2]  K. Grasser,et al.  Interactions of the basic N-terminal and the acidic C-terminal domains of the maize chromosomal HMGB1 protein. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[3]  Michael B. Yaffe,et al.  Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  S. Lippard,et al.  Nature of full-length HMGB1 binding to cisplatin-modified DNA. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[5]  P. Thuriaux,et al.  Hmo1, an HMG‐box protein, belongs to the yeast ribosomal DNA transcription system , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[6]  I. V. Fedorova,et al.  HSM2 (HMO1) gene participates in mutagenesis control in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, DNA repair.

[7]  J. Feigon,et al.  Binding to cisplatin-modified DNA by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMGB protein Nhp6A. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[8]  G. Bauw,et al.  Protein Kinase CK2 Differentially Phosphorylates Maize Chromosomal High Mobility Group B (HMGB) Proteins Modulating Their Stability and DNA Interactions* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  N. Kallenbach,et al.  Interactions between HMG boxes. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[10]  L. Lim,et al.  High-affinity DNA binding of HU protein from the hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  J. O. Thomas,et al.  HMG1 and 2: architectural DNA-binding proteins. , 2001, Biochemical Society transactions.

[12]  J. O. Thomas,et al.  The effect of the acidic tail on the DNA-binding properties of the HMG1,2 class of proteins: insights from tail switching and tail removal. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  S. Lippard,et al.  Intercalating residues determine the mode of HMG1 domains A and B binding to cisplatin-modified DNA. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[14]  S. Wolfe,et al.  Structural studies of the high mobility group globular domain and basic tail of HMG-D bound to disulfide cross-linked DNA. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[15]  N. Kallenbach,et al.  Alanine mutagenesis of high-mobility-group-protein-1 box B (HMG1-B). , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[16]  S. Lippard,et al.  Structure, Recognition, and Processing of Cisplatin-DNA Adducts. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[17]  Michael Bustin,et al.  Regulation of DNA-Dependent Activities by the Functional Motifs of the High-Mobility-Group Chromosomal Proteins , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  J. Wiśniewski,et al.  Constitutive phosphorylation of the acidic tails of the high mobility group 1 proteins by casein kinase II alters their conformation, stability, and DNA binding specificity. , 1999, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  C. Pabo,et al.  Basis for recognition of cisplatin-modified DNA by high-mobility-group proteins , 1999, Nature.

[20]  F. Allain,et al.  Solution structure of the HMG protein NHP6A and its interaction with DNA reveals the structural determinants for non‐sequence‐specific binding , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[21]  J. Ramstein,et al.  Domain-domain interactions in high mobility group 1 protein (HMG1). , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.

[22]  J. Heitman,et al.  Hmo1p, a high mobility group 1/2 homolog, genetically and physically interacts with the yeast FKBP12 prolyl isomerase. , 1999, Genetics.

[23]  P. Cary,et al.  The energetics of HMG box interactions with DNA. Thermodynamic description of the box from mouse Sox-5. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  Determinants of DNA binding and bending by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group protein NHP6A that are important for its biological activities. Role of the unique N terminus and putative intercalating methionine. , 1998, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  D. Lilley,et al.  HMG box proteins bind to four‐way DNA junctions in their open conformation , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[26]  R. Kobayashi,et al.  Characterization of a High Mobility Group 1/2 Homolog in Yeast* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  E. Laue,et al.  Structure of the A-domain of HMG1 and its interaction with DNA as studied by heteronuclear three- and four-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[28]  David A. Case,et al.  Structural basis for DNA bending by the architectural transcription factor LEF-1 , 1995, Nature.

[29]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Molecular basis of human 46X,Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex , 1995, Cell.

[30]  S. Lippard,et al.  HMG domain proteins induce sharp bends in cisplatin-modified DNA. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[31]  Zhou Songyang,et al.  Use of an oriented peptide library to determine the optimal substrates of protein kinases , 1994, Current Biology.

[32]  J. Keeler,et al.  The solution structure and dynamics of the DNA-binding domain of HMG-D from Drosophila melanogaster. , 1994, Structure.

[33]  L. Klimczak,et al.  Microheterogeneous Cytosolic High-Mobility Group Proteins from Broccoli Co-Purify with and Are Phosphorylated by Casein Kinase II , 1994, Plant physiology.

[34]  P. Kraulis,et al.  Structure of the HMG box motif in the B‐domain of HMG1. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[35]  J. Heitman,et al.  Hmo 1 p , a High Mobility Group 1 / 2 Homolog , Genetically and Physically Interacts With the Yeast FKBP 12 Prolyl Isomerase , 1999 .

[36]  R. Reeves,et al.  High-mobility-group chromosomal proteins: architectural components that facilitate chromatin function. , 1996, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[37]  M. Eftink,et al.  Analysis of multidimensional spectroscopic data to monitor unfolding of proteins. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.