Why do People Sacrifice for Their Nations

This article examines how national identification can become so powerful as to overcome considerations of self-interest and win a contest of altruisms with primary social groups in the name of an imagined community. It develops a prototheory that draws on the insights of three competing theoretical approaches to nationalism: primordialist, instrumentalist, and constructivist. It explorres a rational choice approach to nationalism, the limitations of which show the need to focus on how national leaders use emotional and metaphorical appeals to tie national symbols to the strong forces of primary group identification. Nationalist appeals work by focusing individuals on emotional imperatives or moral norms linked to the nation, thus prempting rational self-interest calculations and competing loyalties. The theory is consistent with current understanding of evolved human cognitive capacities and mechanisms of altruism, identifies specific rhetorical mechanisms, and suggests particular hypotheses about nationalist rhetoric

[1]  R. Hinde Patriotism: Is Kin Selection Both Necessary and Sufficient? , 1989, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[2]  B. Anderson,et al.  Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism , 1986 .

[3]  H. Simon,et al.  A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. , 1990, Science.

[4]  J. Piliavin,et al.  Altruism: A Review of Recent Theory and Research , 1990 .

[5]  Barry r. Posen Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power , 1993 .

[6]  E. Hobsbawm,et al.  The invention of tradition , 1986 .

[7]  D. Druckman Nationalism, patriotism, and group loyalty: A social psychological perspective , 1994 .

[8]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  R. Shaw,et al.  Genetic Seeds of Warfare: Evolution, Nationalism, and Patriotism , 1989 .

[10]  A. Fiske The cultural relativity of selfish individualism: Anthropological evidence that humans are inherently sociable. , 1991 .

[11]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[12]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[13]  C. Enloe Ethnic Conflict and Political Development , 1973 .

[14]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  S. Schwartz Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .

[16]  M. Ross The Role of Evolution in Ethnocentric Conflict and Its Management , 1991 .

[17]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[19]  S. Klein,et al.  Gift of Life: The Social and Psychological Impact of Organ Transplantation , 1980 .

[20]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[21]  C. Young The Politics Of Cultural Pluralism , 1977 .

[22]  Eric J. Hobsbawm,et al.  The age of revolution, 1789-1848 , 1963 .

[23]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms , 1985 .

[24]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  Social Dilemmas, Economic Self-Interest, and Evolutionary Theory , 1991 .