Frequency Effects in the Processing of Italian Nominal Compounds: Modulation of Headedness and Semantic Transparency

Abstract There is a general debate as to whether constituent representations are accessed in compound processing. The present study addresses this issue, exploiting the properties of Italian compounds to test the role of headedness and semantic transparency in constituent access. In a first experiment, a lexical decision task was run on nominal compounds. Significant interactions between constituent-frequencies, headedness and semantic transparency emerged, indicating facilitatory frequency effects for transparent and head-final compounds, thus highlighting the importance of the semantic and structural properties of the compounds in lexical access. In a second experiment, converging evidence was sought in an eye-tracking study. The compounds were embedded into sentence contexts, and fixation durations were measured. The results did in fact confirm the effect observed in the first experiment. The results are consistent with a multi-route model of compound processing, but also indicate the importance of a semantic route dedicated to the conceptual combination of constituent meanings.

[1]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds , 1994 .

[2]  S. Andrews,et al.  Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap , 2004 .

[3]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[4]  Lars Placke,et al.  Eye movements during the reading of compound words and the influence of lexeme meaning , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[5]  M. Dardano,et al.  La formazione delle parole nell'italiano di oggi : primi materiali e proposte , 1978 .

[6]  Helena C Kraemer,et al.  Centring in regression analyses: a strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference , 2004, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[7]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .

[8]  Jacob Cohen The Cost of Dichotomization , 1983 .

[9]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Statistics in Psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards , 2004 .

[10]  J. Kevin O'Regan,et al.  A Challenge to Current Theories of Eye Movements in Reading. , 1995 .

[11]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds , 2011 .

[12]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Lexical Access via an Orthographic Code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) Reconsidered. , 1983 .

[13]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eyemovement-contingent display change study , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[14]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[15]  Nivja H. de Jong,et al.  Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Dutch and Hebrew , 2005 .

[16]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words , 2006 .

[17]  Gary Libben,et al.  Processing Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study , 1999, Brain and Language.

[18]  Marcello Gallucci,et al.  A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[19]  S. Andrews Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? , 1986 .

[20]  M. Taft Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  Lee H. Wurm,et al.  Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities , 2007 .

[22]  Gunlög Josefsson,et al.  Head of a word , 1998 .

[23]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. , 1993 .

[24]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition , 2007 .

[26]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Morphological dynamics in compound processing , 2008 .

[27]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  I. Laka,et al.  Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words , 2009 .

[29]  R. Baayen,et al.  Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[31]  E. Williams,et al.  On the definition of word , 1987 .

[32]  R. Baayen,et al.  Frequency effects in compound production. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  M. Carreiras,et al.  The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? , 2009 .

[35]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary , 2010, Cognition.

[36]  G. Keppel,et al.  Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. , 1990 .

[37]  Dušica Filipović Đurđević,et al.  An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. , 2011, Psychological review.

[38]  Francesco Sabatini,et al.  Il Sabatini Coletti : dizionario della lingua italiana , 2003 .

[39]  F. J. Anscombe,et al.  Distribution of the Kurtosis Statistic b2 for Normal Samples. , 1983 .

[40]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes Does Not Occur , 1990 .

[41]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Parafoveal processing within and between words , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[44]  Gary Libben,et al.  Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness , 2003, Brain and Language.

[45]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The processing of compound words in English: Effects of word length on eye movements during reading , 2008 .

[46]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[47]  M. Marelli,et al.  Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds: A constituent priming study in Italian , 2009 .

[48]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. , 2000 .

[49]  R. Baayen A real experiment is a factorial experiment , 2010 .

[50]  A. Ralli,et al.  The Role of Morphological Structure in the Processing of Compounds: The Interface between Linguistics and Psycholinguistics , 1999, Brain and Language.

[51]  Gary Libben,et al.  Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing, and Impairment , 1998, Brain and Language.

[52]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .

[53]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  F. Vitu,et al.  A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  J. Hyönä,et al.  The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .

[56]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Conceptual Combination: Implications for the mental lexicon , 2007 .

[57]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  The activation of semantic memory: Effects of prime exposure, prime-target relationship, and task demands , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[58]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Does s now man prime plastic snow ?: The effect of constituent position in using relational information during the interpretation of modifier-noun phrases , 2009 .

[59]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words , 2005 .

[60]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Modeling morphological processing. , 1995 .

[61]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  Individual differences in visual comprehension of morphological complexity , 2011, CogSci.