Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study

Objective The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,227 patients with EOC treated between 1986 and 2017 at 14 institutions. Among them, 335 patients with stage IIB-IV HGSC who underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor of <1 cm) were included. Patients were divided into the RLNA group (n=170) and non-RLNA group (n=165). All pathological slides were assessed based on a central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups in the original and weighted cohorts adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results The median observation period was 49.8 (0.5–241.5) months. Overall, 219 (65%) out of 335 patients had recurrence or progression, while 146 (44%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, RLNA was a significant prognostic factor for longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.741; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.558–0.985) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.652; 95% CI=0.459–0.927). In the weighted cohort in which all variables were well balanced as standardized differences decreased, RLNA was also a significant prognostic factor for more favorable oncologic outcomes (PFS, adjusted HR=0.742; 95% CI=0.613–0.899) and OS, adjusted HR=0.620; 95% CI=0.488–0.787). Conclusion The present study demonstrated that RLNA for stage III-IV HGSC with no residual tumor after primary debulking surgery contributed to better oncologic outcomes.

[1]  H. Kajiyama,et al.  The impact of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy on long-term oncologic outcome of women with advanced ovarian clear-cell carcinoma , 2020, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[2]  H. Kajiyama,et al.  Fertility-Sparing surgery for young women with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: a multicenteric comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting , 2019, European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X.

[3]  H. Kajiyama,et al.  Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes between metastatic ovarian carcinoma originating from gastrointestinal organs and advanced mucinous ovarian carcinoma , 2019, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Jae-Weon Kim,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Neoplasms , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  E. Chapman-Davis,et al.  Prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy and prevalence of lymph node metastasis in clinically-apparent stage I endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinoma. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  M. van der Aa,et al.  The impact of lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival: A nationwide cohort study of patients with clinical early-stage ovarian cancer. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[7]  E. Stuart,et al.  Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Y. Minagawa,et al.  Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group , 2013, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  H. Kajiyama,et al.  Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients? , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  J. Berek,et al.  The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13 918 patients , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  W. Cliby,et al.  Role of lymphadenectomy in the management of grossly apparent advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  V. Torri,et al.  Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Lymph node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of 276 pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomies and surgical implications. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  H. Howe,et al.  Pathology and classification of ovarian tumors , 2003, Cancer.

[15]  W T McGivney,et al.  The National Comprehensive Cancer Network , 1998, Cancer.

[16]  V. Canzonieri,et al.  Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease. , 1997, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[17]  L. Cobellis,et al.  Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for advanced ovarian cancer: prognostic significance of node metastases. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .