The microcosm of a biogas fermenter: Comparison of moderate hyperthermophilic (60°C) with thermophilic (55°C) conditions

An automated biogas fermenter running continuously for about two years using fodder and sugar beet silage as mono‐substrate without manure addition was analyzed simultaneously by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis and microscopy. In this long‐term fermentation study, an oscillating population of prokaryotes was observed. The presence of most bacteria expected to be involved in hydrolysis of biomass via the anaerobic food chain was confirmed. In any case the methanogen population appeared more stable as it exhibited a lesser degree of variability. The more fluctuating population structure of the bacteria might be due to the fact that most of them were carbohydrate fermenting species which were therefore somewhat interchangeable. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens using H2+CO2 as substrate (Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales) clearly dominated. Therefore, the methanogenesis of energy crops is apparently initiated by gasification to H2+CO2 followed by the biogasification to CH4+CO2. Acetotrophic methanogens (Methanosarcinales) represented a minority with a proportion of 10% or less of the methanogenic population (only at 55°C). The acetotrophic Methanosaeta seemed to be completely absent at temperatures of 55 or 60°C. Pure culture studies established previously that Methanobacteria tolerate at least a sixfold higher ammonium concentration (6000 mg/L) than Methanosaeta and a twofold higher ammonium concentration than Methansarcina. This indicates that running industrial scale fermenters at thermophilic instead of the common mesophilic conditions might be an effective way to exclude the more stress susceptible (e.g. high concentration of ammonium, H2S and acetate) acetotrophic methanogens and therefore improve the reliability of such plants.

[1]  Peter H. Janssen,et al.  Structure of the Archaeal Community of the Rumen , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  K. Naguib Influence of thiamin on growth and fat formation by Penicillium lilacinum Thom. , 1959, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[3]  Andreas Tauch,et al.  Taxonomic composition and gene content of a methane-producing microbial community isolated from a biogas reactor. , 2008, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  B. Ahring Methanogenesis in thermophilic biogas reactors , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[5]  Michele Galatola,et al.  The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  P. Scherer,et al.  Continuous biogas production from fodder beet silage as sole substrate. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  M. Klocke,et al.  Microbial diversity in a biogas-producing co-fermentation of maize silage and bovine manure , 2007 .

[8]  F. Sarhan,et al.  DNA degradation caused by ozone in mucoid mutants of Escherichia coli K12 , 1977 .

[9]  Birgitte Kiær Ahring,et al.  Acetate oxidation in a thermophilic anaerobic sewage-sludge digestor: the importance of non-aceticlastic methanogenesis from acetate , 1991 .

[10]  I. Friedberg,et al.  Freeze‐fracture‐etching studies on Bidellovibrio bacteriovorus mutants of altered host dependency , 1977 .

[11]  J Keller,et al.  A review of ADM1 extensions, applications, and analysis: 2002-2005. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  W. Whitman,et al.  Metabolic, Phylogenetic, and Ecological Diversity of the Methanogenic Archaea , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Suiying Huang,et al.  How Stable Is Stable? Function versus Community Composition , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  M. Schloter,et al.  Traditional cattle manure application determines abundance, diversity and activity of methanogenic Archaea in arable European soil. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[15]  G. Patel,et al.  Ammonia toxicity in pure cultures of methanogenic bacteria , 1986 .

[16]  M. Klocke,et al.  Archaea diversity within a commercial biogas plant utilizing herbal biomass determined by 16S rDNA and mcrA analysis , 2008, Journal of applied microbiology.

[17]  D. Le Paslier,et al.  Novel Major Bacterial Candidate Division within a Municipal Anaerobic Sludge Digester , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  S. Zinder,et al.  Hydrogen Partial Pressures in a Thermophilic Acetate-Oxidizing Methanogenic Coculture , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[19]  M. Klocke,et al.  Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. , 2007, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[20]  B. Demirel,et al.  Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process , 2008 .

[21]  L Björnsson,et al.  Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two‐stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[22]  N. Pace,et al.  Novel Division Level Bacterial Diversity in a Yellowstone Hot Spring , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  D. T. Hill,et al.  USING NITROGEN RATIO AS AN INDICATOR OF BIOMASS RETENTION AND STEADY-STATE IN ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION , 1988 .

[24]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Influence of Environmental Conditions on Methanogenic Compositions in Anaerobic Biogas Reactors , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  R. Huber,et al.  Phylum All. Euryarchaeota phy. nov. , 2001 .

[26]  K. Schleifer,et al.  The All-Species Living Tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. , 2008, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[27]  Jaakko Puhakka,et al.  Impact of crop species on bacterial community structure during anaerobic co-digestion of crops and cow manure. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[28]  B. Demirel,et al.  Application of a fuzzy logic control system for continuous anaerobic digestion of low buffered, acidic energy crops as mono‐substrate , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[29]  Å. Nordberg,et al.  Ammonia, a selective agent for methane production by syntrophic acetate oxidation at mesophilic temperature. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  G. Abraham,et al.  Genetically engineered Pseudomonas: a factory of new bioplastics with broad applications. , 2001, Environmental microbiology.

[31]  G. Garrity Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology , 2012, Springer New York.

[32]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Acetate Oxidation Is the Dominant Methanogenic Pathway from Acetate in the Absence of Methanosaetaceae , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Application of nested polymerase chain reaction for the detection of as yet uncultured organisms of the class Actinobacteria in environmental samples. , 1999, Environmental microbiology.

[34]  B. Demirel,et al.  Long term fermentation studies about the nutritional requirements for biogasification of fodder beet silage as mono-substrate , 2009 .

[35]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of bioenergy , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Dan Spiegelman,et al.  A survey of the methods for the characterization of microbial consortia and communities. , 2005, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[37]  Marion Leclerc,et al.  Diversity of the archaeal community in 44 anaerobic digesters as determined by single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and 16S rDNA sequencing. , 2004, Environmental microbiology.

[38]  G. Vogels,et al.  Improved identification of methanogenic bacteria by fluorescence microscopy , 1978, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[39]  E. Stackebrandt Taxonomic parameters revisited : tarnished gold standards , 2006 .

[40]  S. Zinder Conversion of acetic acid to methane by thermophiles , 1990 .

[41]  V. O’Flaherty,et al.  Methanogenic population structure in a variety of anaerobic bioreactors. , 2003, FEMS microbiology letters.

[42]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Anaerobic Digestion of Renewable Biomass: Thermophilic Temperature Governs Methanogen Population Dynamics , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[43]  B. Ahring,et al.  Molecular ecology of anaerobic reactor systems. , 2003, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.