Improving Remanufacturing Core Recovery and Profitability Through Seeding

Through analytical modeling and a numerical study grounded in observations from automotive remanufacturing, this study examines seeding—selling new products as remanufactured at the start of a new product's lifecycle—in order to increase core recovery quantities, to allow firms to start efficient remanufacturing earlier, and to fulfill demand for remanufactured products throughout the product's lifecycle. Though seeding has received little attention in the academic literature, many durable goods industries, such as automotive parts and heavy equipment remanufacturing, employ seeding because a lack of used units (cores) significantly constrains their remanufacturing operations. The results reveal that the cost of producing a new unit and the shape of the product lifecycle curve are key determinants of the profitability of seeding. Specifically, if the price of the remanufactured product is less than the cost of producing a new unit, then the profitability of seeding is impacted negatively when the product lifecycle ramps up slowly or when there is a large time lag for the recovery of seeded units. In effect, initial sales of seeded units at a loss for a longer period reduces and potentially nullifies the benefits of seeding. Conversely, if initial sales of seeded units are profitable, then a slower ramp‐up of the product lifecycle or a large time lag for the recovery of seeded units has a positive impact on the profitability of seeding because seeding under these circumstances allows the firm to meet demand for remanufactured products profitably earlier in the lifecycle. The results from a numerical study indicate that seeding increases total remanufacturing profits by an average of 23% and a maximum of 40% over the product's lifecycle.

[1]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  Supply Chain Coordination for False Failure Returns , 2006, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[2]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  Inventory strategies for systems with fast remanufacturing , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  The Potential for Cannibalization of New Products Sales by Remanufactured Products , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[4]  Rainer Kleber,et al.  An Advanced Heuristic for Multiple‐Option Spare Parts Procurement after End‐of‐Production , 2013 .

[5]  Ramanath Subramanyam,et al.  Key Factors in the Market for Remanufactured Products , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[6]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Managing New and Remanufactured Products , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Inventory Management in a Consumer Electronics Closed-Loop Supply Chain , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[8]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Lifecycle Pricing for Installed Base Management with Constrained Capacity and Remanufacturing , 2012 .

[9]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  Optimal pricing for new and remanufactured products , 2015 .

[10]  Christos Zikopoulos,et al.  Impact of uncertainty in the quality of returns on the profitability of a single-period refurbishing operation , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  David R. Rink,et al.  Product life cycle research: A literature review , 1979 .

[12]  Harvey M. Wagner,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 1995, Oper. Res..

[13]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  Delayed Differentiation for Multiple Lifecycle Products , 2013 .

[14]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  How Does Product Recovery Affect Quality Choice? , 2013 .

[15]  H. Neil Geismar,et al.  Strategic design of multiple lifecycle products for remanufacturing operations , 2017 .

[16]  H. Groenevelt,et al.  COMPETITION IN REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[17]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  So What If Remanufacturing Cannibalizes My New Product Sales? , 2010 .

[18]  Necati Aras,et al.  Optimal Prices and Trade-in Rebates for Durable, Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[19]  C. R. Anderson,et al.  Stage of the Product Life Cycle, Business Strategy, and Business Performance , 1984 .

[20]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  The Economics of Remanufacturing Under Limited Component Durability and Finite Product Life Cycles , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[22]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  Addressing Supply–Demand Imbalance: Designing Efficient Remanufacturing Strategies , 2016 .

[23]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Product Reuse Economics in Closed‐Loop Supply Chain Research , 2008 .

[24]  Michael R. Galbreth,et al.  Optimal Acquisition and Sorting Policies for Remanufacturing , 2006 .

[25]  G. Keoleian,et al.  The Value of Remanufactured Engines: Life‐Cycle Environmental and Economic Perspectives , 2004 .

[26]  L. B. Toktay,et al.  Joint Life‐Cycle Dynamics of New and Remanufactured Products , 2006 .

[27]  S. Ryan,et al.  Optimal Price and Quantity of Refurbished Products , 2006 .

[28]  Patroklos Georgiadis,et al.  The Impact of Product Lifecycle on Capacity Planning of Closed‐Loop Supply Chains with Remanufacturing , 2006 .

[29]  Gilvan C. Souza Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Critical Review, and Future Research , 2013, Decis. Sci..

[30]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  OR FORUM - The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research , 2009, Oper. Res..

[31]  Rainer Kleber,et al.  The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products , 2017 .

[32]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies , 2006 .

[33]  Xiuli Chao,et al.  Optimal Control of Inventory Systems with Multiple Types of Remanufacturable Products , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[34]  Simme Douwe Flapper,et al.  Product recovery in stochastic remanufacturing systems with multiple reuse options , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Ismail Serdar Bakal,et al.  Effects of Random Yield in Remanufacturing with Price‐Sensitive Supply and Demand , 2006 .

[36]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  Trade-In Rebates for Price Discrimination and Product Recovery , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[37]  Gilvan C. Souza Sustainable Operations and Closed-Loop Supply Chains , 2012 .

[38]  Yue Jin,et al.  When to Offer Lower Quality or Remanufactured Versions of a Product , 2016, Decis. Sci..

[39]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  A typology of remanufacturing in closed-loop supply chains , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[40]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  Relicensing as a Secondary Market Strategy , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  Time Value of Commercial Product Returns , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Çerag Pinçe,et al.  Extracting Maximum Value from Consumer Returns: Allocating Between Remarketing and Refurbishing for Warranty Claims , 2016, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[43]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Inventory Control in Hybrid Systems with Remanufacturing , 1999 .

[44]  Warren H. Hausman,et al.  Warranty Inventory Optimization for Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc , 2007, Interfaces.

[45]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  The Value of Quality Grading in Remanufacturing , 2009 .

[47]  Michael R. Galbreth,et al.  Product Reuse in Innovative Industries , 2013 .

[48]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  Dismantle or remanufacture? , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[49]  Adem Orsdemir,et al.  Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing , 2014 .