Monte Carlo-based treatment planning for a spoiler system with experimental validation using plane-parallel ionization chambers

A beam spoiler is often used to increase the build-up dose near the surface for treatment of superficial treatment areas. Photon-beam spoilers produce a large amount of contaminant electrons, conditions for which standard, commercial treatment-planning system dose-calculation algorithms are inadequate for producing accurate dose calculations. In this study, we implemented a Monte Carlo (MC) dose-calculation algorithm for this spoiler system. With and without a spoiler of 1 cm Lucite, depth doses and transverse profiles in the build-up region were measured for field sizes of 5 x 5 cm2 and 10 x 10 cm2 at the spoiler-to-surface distances (STSDs) of 6, 10 and 15 cm. An Attix chamber and a Markus chamber were used for depth doses, whereas a diode detector was used for transverse profiles. An MC simulation using BEAM/DOSXYZ was used to compare the calculated and the measured data. The MC calculations agreed with the Attix chamber measurements within 2% for all STSDs and field sizes, whereas the Markus data--even with corrections made-showed a discrepancy of about 3.5% with a maximum difference of 7.3% for a field size of 10 x 10 cm2 at an STSD of 6 cm. The MC treatment-planning system was successfully applied to a head-and-neck case using 6 MV photon beams with a beam spoiler.

[1]  J. Purdy,et al.  Build-up region of megavoltage photon radiation sources. , 1975, Medical physics.

[2]  Z. Kolitsi,et al.  Scattered radiation from beam modifiers used with megavoltage therapy units. , 1979, Radiology.

[3]  A. Wu Effects of an acrylic resin tray on relative surface doses for 10 MV X ray beams. , 1980, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  B. Nilsson Electron contamination from different materials in high energy photon beams. , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  K. Kase,et al.  Measurements of dose from secondary radiation outside a treatment field: effects of wedges and blocks. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  David W. O. Rogers,et al.  Presta: The parameter reduced electron-step transport algorithm for electron monte carlo transport , 1986 .

[7]  B. Nilsson,et al.  Fluence perturbation in photon beams under nonequilibrium conditions. , 1986, Medical physics.

[8]  A. Rubach,et al.  Dose build-up curves for cobalt-60 irradiation: a systematic error occurring with pancake chamber measurements. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  F. Khan,et al.  Measurement of dose in the buildup region using fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers. , 1990, Medical physics.

[10]  D. Mellenberg Determination of build-up region over-response corrections for a Markus-type chamber. , 1990, Medical physics.

[11]  J. A. Rawlinson,et al.  Design of parallel plate ion chambers for buildup measurements in megavoltage photon beams. , 1992, Medical physics.

[12]  B. Gerbi The response characteristics of a newly designed plane-parallel ionization chamber in high-energy photon and electron beams. , 1993, Medical physics.

[13]  M. Altschuler,et al.  Calculation of the dose in the build-up region for high energy photon beam. Treatment planning when beam spoilers are employed , 1995 .

[14]  M. Altschuler,et al.  Calculation of the dose in the build-up region for high energy photon beam. Treatment planning when beam spoilers are employed. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  C. Ma,et al.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. , 1995, Medical physics.

[16]  A. Niroomand-rad,et al.  Effects of beam spoiler on radiation dose for head and neck irradiation with 10-MV photon beam. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Treatment of head and neck cancer. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  C. Ma,et al.  Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[19]  Paul J. Keall,et al.  Performance benchmarks of the MCV Monte Carlo system , 2000 .

[20]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Questions for comparison of clinical Monte Carlo codes , 2000 .

[21]  Alireza Kassaeea,et al.  Beam spoilers versus bolus for 6 mv photon treatment of head and neck cancers , 2000 .

[22]  S. Cora,et al.  Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM. , 2000, Medical physics.

[23]  P. Bloch,et al.  Doses near the surface during total‐body irradiation with 15 MV X‐rays , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[24]  M. Butson,et al.  Lepton contamination and photon scatter produced by open field X-ray beams in the build-up region , 2002 .

[25]  R. Mohan,et al.  Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set. , 2003, Medical physics.