Roughness tolerances for Cherenkov telescope mirrors

The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) is a forthcoming international ground-based observatory for very high-energy gamma rays. Its goal is to reach sensitivity five to ten times better than existing Cherenkov telescopes such as VERITAS, H.E.S.S. or MAGIC and extend the range of observation to energies down to few tens of GeV and beyond 100 TeV. To achieve this goal, an array of about 100 telescopes is required, meaning a total reflective surface of several thousands of square meters. Thence, the optimal technology used for CTA mirrors' manufacture should be both low-cost (~1000 euros/m2) and allow high optical performances over the 300-550 nm wavelength range. More exactly, a reflectivity higher than 85% and a PSF (Point Spread Function) diameter smaller than 1 mrad. Surface roughness can significantly contribute to PSF broadening and limit telescope performances. Fortunately, manufacturing techniques for mirrors are now available to keep the optical scattering well below the geometrically-predictable effect of figure errors. This paper determines first order surface finish tolerances based on a surface microroughness characterization campaign, using Phase Shift Interferometry. That allows us to compute the roughness contribution to Cherenkov telescope PSF. This study is performed for diverse mirror candidates (MAGIC-I and II, ASTRI, MST) varying in manufacture technologies, selected coating materials and taking into account the degradation over time due to environmental hazards.

[1]  John C. Stover,et al.  Use of the surface PSD and incident angle adjustments to investigate near specular scatter from smooth surfaces , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[2]  Daniele Spiga,et al.  Mirrors for X-ray telescopes: Fresnel diffraction-based computation of point spread functions from metrology , 2014, 1409.1750.

[3]  Giovanni Pareschi,et al.  Cold-shaping of thin glass foils as a method for mirror processing: from basic concepts to mass production of mirrors , 2012 .

[4]  D. Spiga,et al.  Analysis of microroughness evolution in x-ray astronomical multilayer mirrors by surface topography with the MPES program and by x-ray scattering , 2015, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[5]  J. Stover Optical Scattering: Measurement and Analysis , 1990 .

[6]  V. Golev,et al.  Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: an advanced facility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astronomy , 2011 .

[7]  Enrico Giro,et al.  The reflective surface of the MAGIC telescope , 2003 .

[8]  Robert E. Parks MicroFinish Topographer: surface finish metrology for large and small optics , 2011, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[9]  J. M. Davies,et al.  Design of the quartermaster solar furnace , 1957 .

[10]  Enrico Giro,et al.  The ASTRI SST-2M Prototype: Structure and Mirror , 2013 .

[11]  D. Spiga,et al.  Computation and validation of two-dimensional PSF simulation based on physical optics , 2015, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[12]  Enrico Giro,et al.  Glass mirrors by cold slumping to cover 100 m2 of the MAGIC II Cherenkov telescope reflecting surface , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[13]  Denis Bastieri,et al.  The MAGIC telescope reflecting surface , 2004 .