A comparison of shark and wolf research reveals similar behavioral responses by prey

Marine and terrestrial ecologists rarely exchange information, yet comparing research from both sides of the land–sea boundary holds great potential for improving our understanding of ecological processes. For example, by comparing the interaction between tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) and dugongs (Dugong dugon) to that between gray wolves (Canis lupus) and elk (Cervus elaphus), we show that top predators in marine and terrestrial ecosystems trigger three similar types of anti-predator behavior: (1) encounter avoidance, (2) escape facilitation, and (3) increased vigilance. By implication, the ecological roles of top predators in both ecosystems may be more similar than previously thought, and studies that fail to account for multiple modes of anti-predator behavior are likely to underestimate these roles and the consequences of eliminating predators from ecosystems. We encourage more communication between marine and terrestrial ecologists, in the interest of generating further insights into ecosystem dy...

[1]  A. Houston,et al.  Starvation and Predation as Factors Limiting Population Size , 1987 .

[2]  John H. Steele,et al.  Can ecological theory cross the land-sea boundary? , 1991 .

[3]  W. Cresswell,et al.  Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa totanus , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Population Consequences of Predation-Sensitive Foraging: The Serengeti Wildebeest , 1995 .

[5]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects of Predation and Predation Risk in Old‐Field Interaction Webs , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Chase.  Are there real differences among aquatic and terrestrial food webs? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Trophic Cascades in Terrestrial Systems: A Review of the Effects of Carnivore Removals on Plants , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[8]  S. Peacor,et al.  The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Laundré,et al.  Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. , 2001 .

[10]  Susan Lingle.  COYOTE PREDATION AND HABITAT SEGREGATION OF WHITE-TAILED DEER AND MULE DEER , 2002 .

[11]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  FOOD AVAILABILITY AND TIGER SHARK PREDATION RISK INFLUENCE BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN HABITAT USE , 2002 .

[12]  L. Dill,et al.  Habitat use and foraging behavior of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in a seagrass ecosystem , 2002 .

[13]  S. Andelman,et al.  COMPARING MARINE AND TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF COASTAL MARINE RESERVES , 2003 .

[14]  M. Childress,et al.  Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  S. Peacor,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[16]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Trophic cascades : the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions , 2004 .

[17]  W. Ripple,et al.  Wolves and the Ecology of Fear: Can Predation Risk Structure Ecosystems? , 2004 .

[18]  Robert D. McCauley,et al.  Change in abundance of dugongs in Shark Bay, Ningaloo and Exmouth Gulf, Western Australia: evidence for large-scale migration , 2004 .

[19]  S. Creel,et al.  Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves , 2005 .

[20]  D. Bolnick,et al.  SCARED TO DEATH? THE EFFECTS OF INTIMIDATION AND CONSUMPTION IN PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS , 2005 .

[21]  H. Browman,et al.  Communication between terrestrial and marine ecologists : loud , sometimes abrasive , but healthy and occasionally useful , 2005 .

[22]  H. Browman,et al.  Bridging the gap between aquatic and terrestrial ecology , 2005 .

[23]  D. Raffaelli,et al.  Do marine and terrestrial ecologists do it differently? : Bridging the gap between aquatic and terrestrial ecology , 2005 .

[24]  J. Laundré,et al.  Foraging in the ‘landscape of fear’ and its implications for habitat use and diet quality of elk Cervus elaphus and bison Bison bison , 2005 .

[25]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[26]  W. Ripple,et al.  Linking wolves to willows via risk-sensitive foraging by ungulates in the northern Yellowstone ecosystem , 2006 .

[27]  L. Dill,et al.  Validation of a randomization procedure to assess animal habitat preferences: microhabitat use of tiger sharks in a seagrass ecosystem. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[28]  S. Creel,et al.  Assessment of prey vulnerability through analysis of wolf movements and kill sites. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[29]  J. Mann,et al.  Can environmental heterogeneity explain individual foraging variation in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.)? , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  H. Beyer.  Wolves, elk and willow on Yellowstone National Park's northern range. , 2006 .

[31]  L. Dill,et al.  Tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) abundance and growth in a subtropical embayment: evidence from 7 years of standardized fishing effort , 2006 .

[32]  P. Ewanchuk,et al.  Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[33]  L. Dill,et al.  Can you dig it? Use of excavation, a risky foraging tactic, by dugongs is sensitive to predation danger , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  W. Ripple,et al.  Fine-scale predation risk on elk after wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park, USA , 2008, Oecologia.

[35]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  Living on the edge: dugongs prefer to forage in microhabitats that allow escape from rather than avoidance of predators , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  S. Creel,et al.  Sex-specific behavioural responses of elk to spatial and temporal variation in the threat of wolf predation , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  W. Ripple,et al.  Restoring Yellowstone’s aspen with wolves , 2007 .

[38]  A. Frid,et al.  State-dependent risk-taking by green sea turtles mediates top-down effects of tiger shark intimidation in a marine ecosystem. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[39]  L. Dill,et al.  Fear factor: do dugongs (Dugong dugon) trade food for safety from tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier)? , 2007, Oecologia.

[40]  C. Duarte.  Marine ecology warms up to theory. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  A. Frid,et al.  Seascapes of fear: evaluating sublethal predator effects experienced and generated by marine mammals , 2008 .

[42]  A. Frid,et al.  Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  S. Creel,et al.  Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Barney Luttbeg,et al.  Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator-prey interactions. , 2008, Ecology.

[45]  Margot Hessing-Lewis,et al.  Do terrestrial ecologists ignore aquatic literature , 2009 .

[46]  L. Dill,et al.  Towards a predictive framework for predator risk effects: the interaction of landscape features and prey escape tactics. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[47]  J. Lind,et al.  Individual behavior and survival: the roles of predator avoidance, foraging success, and vigilance , 2009 .

[48]  Michael R. Heithaus,et al.  Spatial responses to predators vary with prey escape mode , 2010, Animal Behaviour.