Majorization–Minimization Algorithms for Wavelet-Based Image Restoration

— Standard formulations of image/signal deconvolu-tion under wavelet-based priors/regularizers lead to very high dimensional optimization problems involving the following difficulties: the non-Gaussian (heavy-tailed) wavelet priors lead to objective functions which are non-quadratic, usually non-differentiable and sometimes even non-convex; the presence of the convolution operator destroys the separability which underlies the simplicity of wavelet-based denoising. This paper presents a unified view of several recently proposed algorithms for handling this class of optimization problems, placing them in a common majorization-minimization (MM) framework. One of the classes of algorithms considered (when using quadratic bounds on non-differentiable log-priors) shares the infamous " singularity issue " (SI) of " iteratively reweighted least squares " (IRLS) algorithms: the possibility of having to handle infinite weights, which may cause both numerical and convergence issues. In this paper, we prove several new results which strongly support the claim that the SI does not compromise the usefulness of this class of algorithms. Exploiting the unified MM perspective, we introduce a new algorithm, resulting from using ℓ1 bounds for non-convex regularizers; the experiments confirm the superior performance of this method, when compared to the one based on quadratic majorization. Finally, an experimental comparison of the several algorithms, reveals their relative merits for different standard types of scenarios.

[1]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[2]  Michael Elad,et al.  Why Simple Shrinkage Is Still Relevant for Redundant Representations? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Javier Portilla,et al.  Deblurring-by-Denoising using Spatially Adaptive Gaussian Scale Mixtures in Overcomplete Pyramids , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Iterative image deconvolution using overcomplete representations , 2006, 2006 14th European Signal Processing Conference.

[5]  Michael Elad,et al.  Image Denoising with Shrinkage and Redundant Representations , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[6]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Bayesian wavelet-based image deconvolution: a GEM algorithm exploiting a class of heavy-tailed priors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  A bound optimization approach to wavelet-based image deconvolution , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[8]  Jean-Jacques Fuchs,et al.  On sparse representations in arbitrary redundant bases , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  ForWaRD: Fourier-wavelet regularized deconvolution for ill-conditioned systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  D. Hunter,et al.  A Tutorial on MM Algorithms , 2004 .

[11]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  J. Fuchs More on sparse representations in arbitrary bases , 2003 .

[13]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  An EM algorithm for wavelet-based image restoration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  I. Daubechies,et al.  An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint , 2003, math/0307152.

[15]  E. Candès,et al.  Astronomical image representation by the curvelet transform , 2003, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[16]  I. Selesnick,et al.  Bivariate shrinkage with local variance estimation , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[17]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Wavelet-based adaptive image deconvolution , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[18]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Wavelet domain image restoration with adaptive edge-preserving regularization , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Low-complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients , 1999, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[20]  Pierre Moulin,et al.  Analysis of Multiresolution Image Denoising Schemes Using Generalized Gaussian and Complexity Priors , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[21]  T. Chan,et al.  On the Convergence of the Lagged Diffusivity Fixed Point Method in Total Variation Image Restoration , 1999 .

[22]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[23]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Wavelet-based statistical signal processing using hidden Markov models , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  C. Burrus,et al.  Introduction to Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms: A Primer , 1997 .

[25]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Noise removal via Bayesian wavelet coring , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[26]  Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,et al.  Spatially adaptive wavelet-based multiscale image restoration , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[27]  D. Donoho Nonlinear Solution of Linear Inverse Problems by Wavelet–Vaguelette Decomposition , 1995 .

[28]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A modified expectation maximization algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[29]  J. Hiriart-Urruty,et al.  Convex analysis and minimization algorithms , 1993 .

[30]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Monotonicity of quadratic-approximation algorithms , 1988 .

[31]  M. West On scale mixtures of normal distributions , 1987 .

[32]  New York Dover,et al.  ON THE CONVERGENCE PROPERTIES OF THE EM ALGORITHM , 1983 .

[33]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[34]  I. J. Schoenberg Metric spaces and completely monotone functions , 1938 .

[35]  K. Siddaraju,et al.  DIGITAL IMAGE RESTORATION , 2011 .

[36]  Barbara Kaltenbacher,et al.  Iterative Solution Methods , 2015, Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging.

[37]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[38]  J. Brimberg FURTHER NOTES ON CONVERGENCE OF THE WEISZFELD ALGORITHM , 2003 .

[39]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Fast communication , 2002 .

[40]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Wavelet-Based Image Estimation : An Empirical Bayes Approach Using Jeffreys ’ Noninformative Prior , 2001 .

[41]  Nick G. Kingsbury,et al.  Image deconvolution using hidden Markov tree modeling of complex wavelet packets , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[42]  Hakan Erdogan,et al.  Monotonic algorithms for transmission tomography , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[44]  Andrew Calway,et al.  Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing , 1996 .

[45]  C. Burrus,et al.  Noise reduction using an undecimated discrete wavelet transform , 1996, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[46]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[47]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant De-Noising , 1995 .

[48]  F. Girosi Models of Noise and Robust Estimates , 1991 .

[49]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.

[50]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing: to Appear Globally Convergent Algorithms for Maximum a Posteriori Transmission Tomography , 2022 .