Evaluating the Effect on User Perception and Performance of Static and Dynamic Contents Deployed in Augmented Reality based Learning Application

Nowadays, the use of technology to improve teaching and learning experiences in the classroom has been promoted. One of these technologies is augmented reality, which allows overlaying layers of virtual information on real scene with the aim of increasing the perception that user has of reality. Augmented reality has proved to offer several advantages in the educational context, i.e. increasing learning engagement and increasing understanding of some topics, especially when spatial skills are involved. Contents deployed in an augmented reality application are of two types, static, i.e. text, or dynamic, i.e. animations. As far as we know no research project has assessed how the type of content, static or dynamic, can affect the student learning perception and performance in augmented reality applications. In this article the development and evaluation of an augmented reality application using static and dynamic content is described. In order to determine how the type of content affects the learning perception and performance of the student, two experimental designs in which the student interact with the application, using static and dynamic contents, for learning topics related with an electronic fundamentals course was performed.

[1]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Effects of Knowledge and Spatial Ability on Learning from Animation , 2007 .

[2]  Noor Dayana Abdul Halim,et al.  Mobile Augmented Reality: The Potential for Education☆ , 2013 .

[3]  Joseph Hocking,et al.  Unity in Action: Multiplatform Game Development in C# with Unity 5 , 2015 .

[4]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[5]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics , 2008 .

[6]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Designing augmented reality for the classroom , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Christian Diaz,et al.  How the Type of Content in Educative Augmented Reality Application Affects the Learning Experience , 2015 .

[8]  Jeff Murray C# Game Programming Cookbook for Unity 3D , 2014 .

[9]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Recent Advances in Augmented Reality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[10]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[11]  W. Schnotz Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[12]  Yasin Ozarslan,et al.  Augmented Reality in Education: Current Technologies and the Potential for Education , 2012 .

[13]  Mireille Betrancourt,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Animation and Interactivity Principles in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[14]  Jennifer Grace Cromley,et al.  Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams , 2010 .

[15]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? , 2011, Comput. Educ..