Does an Extrinsic Reward for R&D Employees Enhance Innovation Outcomes? Evidence from a Japanese Innovation Survey

This paper examines the effects of extrinsic rewards for R&D employees on innovation outcomes based on evidence from a Japanese innovation survey. Theoretical and empirical studies present conflicting findings regarding the relationship between extrinsic rewards and innovation outcomes. This article seeks to shed light on the relationship between rewards and outcomes, as represented by the development of new products and services and their technological superiority and profitability. The analysis produced the following findings. First, companies that have introduced an evaluation system based on R&D performance are more likely to develop new products and services. The introduction of the evaluation system brings about success in product innovation with greater technological superiority. Second, monetary compensation has a negative impact on the development of new products and services and technological superiority. Third, these effects vary with the company size. Small- and medium-sized companies achieve higher technological superiority with performance-based evaluations. Large companies tend to adversely impact the development of new products and services and their technological superiority with monetary compensation.

[1]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  Marta E. Mangelsdorf Motivated to Innovate , 2009 .

[3]  Amol M. Joshi,et al.  When do strategic alliances inhibit innovation by firms? Evidence from patent pools in the global optical disc industry , 2011 .

[4]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[5]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[6]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[7]  F. Vella Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey , 1998 .

[8]  Steven D. Maurer,et al.  The retention of knowledge workers with the unfolding model of voluntary turnover , 1997 .

[9]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications , 2003 .

[10]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. , 1993 .

[12]  Stéphane Robin,et al.  Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany , 2013 .

[13]  Linda R. Martin,et al.  The effectiveness of reward systems on innovative output: An empirical analysis , 1993 .

[14]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[15]  Kenji Matsumoto,et al.  Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Manzini,et al.  Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms in Collaborative New Product Development , 2016 .

[17]  Hideo Owan,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations of Inventors , 2011 .

[18]  Pearl Steinbuch,et al.  Compensation: Theory, Evidence and Strategic Implications , 2004 .

[19]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Them Tick? Employee Motives and Firm Innovation , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Todd Dewett,et al.  Linking Intrinsic Motivation, Risk Taking, and Employee Creativity in an R&D Environment , 2007 .

[21]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  The Progress Principle: Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work , 2011 .

[22]  Mark B. Stewart,et al.  On Least Squares Estimation when the Dependent Variable is Grouped , 1982 .

[23]  Wesley M. Cohen Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance , 2010 .

[24]  Luca Berchicci,et al.  Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance , 2013 .

[25]  H. Harlow,et al.  Learning motivated by a manipulation drive. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  Kiyonori Sakakibara,et al.  Product Development Strategies in Emerging Markets: The Case of Personal Digital Assistants , 1995 .

[27]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[28]  Koichiro Onishi The effects of compensation plans for employee inventions on R&D productivity: New evidence from Japanese panel data , 2013 .

[29]  D. Manolopoulos What motivates R&D professionals? Evidence from decentralized laboratories in Greece , 2006 .

[30]  E. Deci,et al.  Why We Do What We Do: Understanding Self-Motivation , 1996 .

[31]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[32]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity , 2011, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.