Urban growth simulation from "first principles".

General and mathematically transparent models of urban growth have so far suffered from a lack in microscopic realism. Physical models that have been used for this purpose, i.e., diffusion-limited aggregation, dielectric breakdown models, and correlated percolation all have microscopic dynamics for which analogies with urban growth appear stretched. Based on a Markov random field formulation we have developed a model that is capable of reproducing a variety of important characteristic urban morphologies and that has realistic microscopic dynamics. The results presented in this paper are particularly important in relation to "urban sprawl," an important aspect of which is aggressively spreading low-density land uses. This type of growth is increasingly causing environmental, social, and economical problems around the world. The microdynamics of our model, or its "first principles," can be mapped to human decisions and motivations and thus potentially also to policies and regulations. We measure statistical properties of macrostates generated by the urban growth mechanism that we propose, and we compare these to empirical measurements as well as to results from other models. To showcase the open-endedness of the model and to thereby relate our work to applied urban planning we have also included a simulated city consisting of a large number of land use classes in which also topographical data have been used.

[1]  R. Golledge,et al.  Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective , 1996 .

[2]  Michael Batty,et al.  Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function , 1996 .

[3]  Günter Haag,et al.  The rank-size distribution of settlements as a dynamic multifractal phenomenon , 1994 .

[4]  G. Haag Book review: Sociodynamics–A systematic approach to mathematical modelling in the social sciences, by Wolfgang Weidlich , 2000 .

[5]  R. White Dynamic Central Place Theory: Results of a Simulation Approach , 1977 .

[6]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Self-Organized Settlements , 2001 .

[7]  Fulong Wu,et al.  SimLand: A Prototype to Simulate Land Conversion Through the Integrated GIS and CA with AHP-Derived Transition Rules , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  J. S. Andrade,et al.  Modeling urban growth patterns with correlated percolation , 1998, cond-mat/9809431.

[9]  Roger White,et al.  Integrating Constrained Cellular Automata Models, GIS and Decision Support Tools for Urban Planning , 1995 .

[10]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Sociodynamics: a Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences , 2000 .

[11]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[12]  Juval Portugali,et al.  Agent-Based Simulations of a City Dynamics in a GIS Environment , 1997, COSIT.

[13]  M. Batty Generating Urban Forms from Diffusive Growth , 1991 .

[14]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Urban Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  D. Zanette,et al.  ROLE OF INTERMITTENCY IN URBAN DEVELOPMENT : A MODEL OF LARGE-SCALE CITY FORMATION , 1997 .

[16]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[17]  Lucien Benguigui A new aggregation model. Application to town growth , 1995 .

[18]  B. Meredith Burke,et al.  Book Review: Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ Across the U.S. William Fulton, Rolf Pendall, Mai Nguyen, and Alicia Harrison. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, July 2001 (www.brook.edu/urban/fulton%2d pendall.htm) , 2002 .

[19]  Susanna C. Manrubia,et al.  Intermittency model for urban development , 1998 .

[20]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Transient Dynamics and Scaling Phenomena in Urban Growth , 1999 .