With a Little Help from Their Friends: Exploring the Advice Networks of Software Entrepreneurs

This field interview study examined patterns and content of advice sharing networks among 20 software executives to provide a clearer understanding of how advice relationships are established, the types of advice that are shared and the role that relationships play in the support of information exchange and diffusion. Most advice relationships were formed from strong tie relationships, while systematic differences were found among the types of advice sought from advice relationships resulting from strong ties, business ties and weak ties. The preference of software executives for rich communication media supports the importance of establishing trust in advice sharing relationships.

[1]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[2]  Richard N. Cardozo,et al.  Mapping the university technology transfer process , 1997 .

[3]  B. E. Partridge,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974 .

[4]  T. Schøtt.  Emerging and Declining Centers of Engineering Science , 1994 .

[5]  Anne P. Carter,et al.  Knowhow trading as economic exchange , 1989 .

[6]  Robert Kevin Grigsby.  "Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation" , 1996 .

[7]  P. Killworth,et al.  Informant accuracy in social network data IV: a comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data , 1979 .

[8]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[10]  Thomas A. Turk,et al.  Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy , 1991 .

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Stuart Hannabuss,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2001 .

[13]  D. Boje,et al.  A taxonomy of individual learning benefits from external knowledge‐sharing meetings , 1991 .

[14]  L. Freeman,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy , 1987 .

[15]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[16]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[17]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[18]  D. Krackhardt.  Simmelian Ties: Super Strong and Sticky , 1998 .

[19]  P. Killworth,et al.  Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data , 1976 .

[20]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[21]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[22]  Estelle Brodman,et al.  Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (Book Review) , 1978 .

[23]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[24]  E. Hippel.  Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[25]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.