Corporate responsibility reporting in promoting social license to operate in forestry and sawmilling industries

[1]  W. Edwards.  How to Use Multi-Attribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making , 1976 .

[2]  Ward Edwards,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  D. Hussey,et al.  Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines: An Evaluation of Sustainable Development Metrics for Industry , 2001 .

[4]  J. E. Morhardt,et al.  Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria , 2002 .

[5]  R. Kagan,et al.  Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance , 2002, Law & Social Inquiry.

[6]  A. Warhurst.  Future roles of business in society: the expanding boundaries of corporate responsibility and a compelling case for partnership , 2005 .

[7]  David Murillo,et al.  SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in their Own Words , 2006 .

[8]  M. Mikkilä.  The many faces of responsibility: Acceptability of the global pulp and paper industry in various societies , 2006 .

[9]  N. Georgiadis,et al.  Development of a forest certification standard compatible with PEFC and FSC's management requirements. A case study from Greece , 2007 .

[10]  K. Lähtinen.  Linking resource-based view with business economics of woodworking industry : earlier findings and future insights , 2007 .

[11]  D. Williamson,et al.  The Social Licence as a Form of Regulation for Small and Medium Enterprises , 2007 .

[12]  A. Toppinen,et al.  Financial performance in Finnish large- and medium-sized sawmills: The effects of value-added creation and cost-efficiency seeking , 2008 .

[13]  P. Pontrandolfo,et al.  Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: a SME perspective , 2008 .

[14]  S. Seuring,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review , 2009 .

[15]  A. Haara,et al.  Resource usage decisions and business success: A case study of Finnish large- and medium-sized sawmills , 2009 .

[16]  Xitao Fan,et al.  Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Antonio Tencati,et al.  Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-sized, and Large Firms , 2009 .

[18]  David L. Levy,et al.  Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting , 2009 .

[19]  Anne Ellerup Nielsen,et al.  CSR communication in small and medium‐sized enterprises , 2009 .

[20]  Maria Gjølberg.  The origin of corporate social responsibility: global forces or national legacies? , 2009 .

[21]  P. Vihervaara,et al.  The ecosystem approach in corporate environmental management – expert mental models and environmental drivers in the Finnish forest industry , 2009 .

[22]  T Kainulainen,et al.  A statistical approach to assessing interval scale preferences in discrete choice problems , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  Ninni Saarinen,et al.  Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes in Finland , 2010 .

[24]  F. Anseel,et al.  Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995–2008: A Meta-analytic Review and Guidelines for Survey Researchers , 2010 .

[25]  David L. Levy,et al.  The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance , 2010 .

[26]  D. Huisingh,et al.  Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting , 2011 .

[27]  S. Shmelev.  Ecological Economics: Sustainability in Practice , 2011 .

[28]  Mary Anne Barclay,et al.  New Approaches to Evaluating the Performance of Corporate–Community Partnerships: A Case Study from the Minerals Sector , 2011 .

[29]  L. Lönnstedt.  Small Scale Forest Owners’ Responsibilities: Results from a Swedish Case Study , 2012, Small-scale Forestry.

[30]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns , 2011 .

[31]  A. Toppinen,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges in emerging bioenergy business: case of Finnish sawmilling industry , 2012 .

[32]  S. Shmelev.  The Economic System and the Environment , 2012 .

[33]  Ning Li,et al.  Corporate Responsibility and Strategic Groups in the Forest-based Industry: Exploratory Analysis based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Framework , 2012 .

[34]  A. Toppinen,et al.  Global Reporting Initiative and Social Impact in Managing Corporate Responsibility: A Case Study of Three Multinationals in the Forest Industry , 2013 .

[35]  G. Watkins,et al.  Review of sustainability management initiatives within Finnish forest products industry companies—Translating Eu level steering into proactive initiatives , 2013 .

[36]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Sustainability assessment of wood-based bioenergy A methodological framework and a case-study , 2013 .

[37]  Teppo Hujala,et al.  Combining experts' ratings for partly overlapping concept lists: a feasibility test with cultural sustainability indicators , 2013, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci..

[38]  S. Launiainen,et al.  Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Carbon, and Suspended Solids Loads from Forest Clear-Cutting and Site Preparation: Long-Term Paired Catchment Studies from Eastern Finland , 2014, AMBIO.

[39]  R. Ramlogan,et al.  Annual Report on European SMEs 2012/2013: A recovery on the horizon? , 2013 .

[40]  R. Vlosky,et al.  Understanding and Managing Change in the Global Forest Sector , 2013 .

[41]  J. Holopainen,et al.  Consumer value dimensions for sustainable wood products: results from the Finnish retail sector , 2014 .

[42]  P. Leskinen,et al.  A systematic literature review on indicators to assess local sustainability of forest energy production , 2014 .

[43]  William G. Luppold,et al.  Markets and Market Forces for Lumber , 2014 .

[44]  P. Edwards,et al.  Can’t Climb the Trees Anymore: Social Licence to Operate, Bioenergy and Whole Stump Removal in Sweden , 2014 .

[45]  O. Mattila,et al.  Forest Owners’ Socio-demographic Characteristics as Predictors of Customer Value: Evidence from Finland , 2014, Small-scale Forestry.

[46]  R. Boutilier.  Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate , 2014 .

[47]  Stephanie M. Tully,et al.  The Role of the Beneficiary in Willingness to Pay for Socially Responsible Products: A Meta-Analysis , 2014 .

[48]  S. Huttunen.  Stakeholder frames in the making of forest bioenergy legislation in Finland. , 2014 .

[49]  F. Vanclay,et al.  Community engagement and social licence to operate , 2014 .

[50]  J. Holopainen,et al.  On Corporate Responsibility , 2015 .

[51]  T. Myllyviita,et al.  Cultural sustainability in reference to the global reporting initiative (GRI) guidelines: Case forest bioenergy production in North Karelia, Finland , 2015 .

[52]  Talia Jeanneret,et al.  Social licence to operate: An opportunity to enhance CSR for deeper communication and engagement , 2015 .

[53]  H. Karppinen,et al.  Forest owners' stand improvement decisions: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2015 .

[54]  M. Schumann,et al.  An empirical investigation of wood product information valued by young consumers , 2016 .

[55]  Ning Li,et al.  Managerial Perceptions of SMEs in the Wood Industry Supply Chain on Corporate Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Evidence from China and Finland , 2016 .

[56]  A. Roos,et al.  Environmental Policy in the Nordic Wood Product Industry: Insights Into Firms’ Strategies and Communication , 2016 .